• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trinity

PearlSeeker

Well-Known Member
Raising the dead, a new heaven and new earth, everlasting life, the return of Jesus. These are the things that make Jesus God and part of the trinitarian Godhead.

The NT Bible Trinity is different from later Church doctrine. The Son or the Word is a kind of demiurge, subordinate to the Father.... "The Father is greater than me." "Only the Father knows..."
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Trinity

"Trinity", one must say, is a Pauline invention, the Israelites never approved/believed/subscribed to it, right, please?
If yes, then kindly quote from Abraham, please, right?

Regards
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
The way I see it. God is absolute, his breath expanding his unseen to the world is the holy spirit and is the position of the breath of God that points back to God in creation, and that position was occupied by Jesus (a) temporarily, for he was light of the world so long as he was in the world per his own words. So before him it was John (a), and after him it was Elijah (a) proving by the fact that people opposed John and Jesus, and Jesus going to heaven, means someone has to take this role on earth and so Elyas (a) definitely is proven to return, but in a hidden way.

Name of God is a position, started on earth from Adam (a), it's the leadership towards guidance, which people took for themselves falsely and lead to corruption of generations leading to Noah (a).

Jesus (a) is the breath and name of God, the spirit from God and of God, but this position is not unique to him.

Ibrahim (a) attained this position as well.

Now, ranks existed between different Ahlulbayts, so while Elijah (a) can replace the position of Jesus (a), Jesus (a) cannot replace the position of the spirit of God's Authority vested in Mohamad (s) to Hassan Al-Askari (a).

The guide in this age thus must be from Ahlulbayt (a) of Mohammad (s), and it can't be Elyas (a), Khidr (a) or Idris (Enoch) (a).

This is because heaven augmentation that took place through Mohammad (s) must continue and because blessings brought forth are never taken away. This is because God doesn't abrogate or cause disappear a sign except he brings one like it or better and brighter.

The Gospels were not books written or inspired to disciples to write. It was in fact the word of God paraphrased and they compliment each other. Even the infancy Gospels are mostly intact and from God.

Some of the Gospels contradict Quran, but most of it does not.

You should also see my topic about Shiite hadiths matching up with the Gospels.
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Trinity

"Trinity", one must say, is a Pauline invention, the Israelites never approved/believed/subscribed to it, right, please?
If yes, then kindly quote from Abraham, please, right?

Regards
Paul never invented trinity. His explanation was that of sword of God and position of the Welayat of the holy spirit and he talks about this position of leadership and exalted authority from Adam (a) all the way down to Jesus (a) in his writings. He is misunderstood just like Jesus (a) is.

The problem is people think Jesus (a) and Paul acknowledged ALL of the Torah and Tanakh which is false. They correct it in many ways.
 

PearlSeeker

Well-Known Member
Trinity

"Trinity", one must say, is a Pauline invention, the Israelites never approved/believed/subscribed to it, right, please?
If yes, then kindly quote from Abraham, please, right?

Regards

Pauline (and Johannine) theology is not yet Trinity but it (they) certainly contributed to later formulation of Trinity.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Trinity

"Trinity", one must say, is a Pauline* invention, the Israelites never approved/believed/subscribed to it, right, please?
If yes, then kindly quote from Abraham, please, right?
*Paulines include Paul, his associates and the Pauline-Church, right, please?

Regards
 

Link

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Pauline (and Johannine) theology is not yet Trinity but it (they) certainly contributed to later formulation of Trinity.
It's the sorcery, it mind destroyed people to not see what he was saying nor the Gospels, and used them both to blind people.

Something sinister doesn't want people to see the Gospels for what they truly say much like the sorcery blocks people from perceiving the verses about Ahlulbayt (a) in the Quran.
 

PearlSeeker

Well-Known Member
It's the sorcery, it mind destroyed people to not see what he was saying nor the Gospels, and used them both to blind people.

Something sinister doesn't want people to see the Gospels for what they truly say much like the sorcery blocks people from perceiving the verses about Ahlulbayt (a) in the Quran.

I don't think it' was sorcery. Just development of different doctrines and a little politics:

 

LeftyLen

Active Member
According to the Bible The father is God. The Son Jesus whom is God incarnate makes him God as well and The Holy Spirit which is the relationship between the Father and Son also is God. It’s a triangle that can’t be broken. Christians can witness this Godly relationship between God and Jesus through their own communion with The Holy Spirit as well. This would be the steps one would take for enlightenment if one so chooses.

  • I and the Father are one: (John 10:30)
  • Before Abraham was, I am
  • If you've seen me, you've seen the Father
The Roman Trinity is an amalgamation of Greep philosophy, roman religion with some scripture. The creedal Trinity enforced at Nicaea was politically enforced by imperial decree, forced by a very shrewd but corrupt Emperor. Thats your debate point.
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
The Triune Nature of God makes sense to me because God is Love and I believe a loving relationship has existed between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit eternally.

You may like this…



I am amazed at the way the Creator has stamped and revealed His triune nature throughout creation.


“In Romans:1:20
Paul argues that God's "eternal power and Godhead" are seen in the creation He made. God's eternal power—but His Godhead? Yes, as Dr. Wood pointed out years ago in The Secret of the Universe, the triune nature of God is stamped on His creation. The cosmos is divided into three: space, matter and time. Each of these is divided into three. Space, for instance, is composed of length, breadth and width, each separate and distinct in itself, yet the three are one. Length, breadth and width are not three spaces, but three dimensions comprising one space. Run enough lines lengthwise and you take in the whole. But so it is with the width and height. Each is separate and distinct, yet each is all of space—just as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is each God.

Time also is a trinity: past, present and future—two invisible and one visible. Each is separate and distinct, yet each is the whole. Man himself is a triunity of spirit, soul and body, two of which are invisible, one visible. Many more details could be given of the Godhead's triunity reflected in the universe. It can hardly be coincidence.”
Issac Newton called the Trinity 'theological gibberish." In the trinity Jesus seems to be a part of God that broke off. From Paul to Constantine there was a miasma of beliefs, the trinity that emerged as official dogma was one of those beliefs.
 

King Phenomenon

Veteran Member
The Roman Trinity is an amalgamation of Greep philosophy, roman religion with some scripture. The creedal Trinity enforced at Nicaea was politically enforced by imperial decree, forced by a very shrewd but corrupt Emperor. Thats your debate point.
Jesus said he was God.

  • I and the Father are one: (John 10:30)
  • Before Abraham was, I am
  • If you've seen me, you've seen the Father
 

LeftyLen

Active Member
Jesus said he was God.

  • I and the Father are one: (John 10:30)
  • Before Abraham was, I am
  • If you've seen me, you've seen the Father
'I and the Father are one"-- yes in goal , plan of salvation. I AM is Yahweh, Jesus in the OT..".If you have seen me you have seen the Father. "--Letting the Apostles the Father is not some nebulas space goo.
Jesus said he was God.

  • I and the Father are one: (John 10:30)
  • Before Abraham was, I am
  • If you've seen me, you've seen the Father
1. Yes they are one in purpose. 2. Jesus is the great I AM Yahweh of the OT.. 3. To the Apostles the Father was like Him, and not some nebulas spirit goo.
4. modern Christians wish to apply a "doctrinal exclusion" to declare who is or isn't Christian. Such definitions are generally self-serving, and not very helpful. With the Nicene Creed, critics are ironically in the position of using a definition that would exclude all Christians for more than two centuries after Christ from the Christian fold.

The New Testament itself is far from any doctrine of the Trinity or of a triune God who is three co-equal Persons of One Nature.
The New Testament does not contain the developed doctrine of the Trinity.
There is in them [the Apostolic Fathers], of course, no trinitarian doctrine and no awareness of a trinitarian problem."
The Church had to wait for more than three hundred years for a final synthesis, for not until the Council of Constantinople [AD 381] was the formula of one God existing in three coequal Persons formally ratified.
These passages are succinct summaries. If a critic wishes to justify his or her belief in the creedal Trinity, they must rely on tradition and the creeds of the 4th century, and abandon claims of scriptural or historical support for such a belief in early Christianity, including among the apostles and those they taught.
 

King Phenomenon

Veteran Member
'I and the Father are one"-- yes in goal , plan of salvation. I AM is Yahweh, Jesus in the OT..".If you have seen me you have seen the Father. "--Letting the Apostles the Father is not some nebulas space goo.

1. Yes they are one in purpose. 2. Jesus is the great I AM Yahweh of the OT.. 3. To the Apostles the Father was like Him, and not some nebulas spirit goo.
4. modern Christians wish to apply a "doctrinal exclusion" to declare who is or isn't Christian. Such definitions are generally self-serving, and not very helpful. With the Nicene Creed, critics are ironically in the position of using a definition that would exclude all Christians for more than two centuries after Christ from the Christian fold.





These passages are succinct summaries. If a critic wishes to justify his or her belief in the creedal Trinity, they must rely on tradition and the creeds of the 4th century, and abandon claims of scriptural or historical support for such a belief in early Christianity, including among the apostles and those they taught.
  • I and the Father are one: (John 10:30)
  • Before Abraham was, I am
  • If you've seen me, you've seen the Father
 

InChrist

Free4ever
Issac Newton called the Trinity 'theological gibberish." In the trinity Jesus seems to be a part of God that broke off. From Paul to Constantine there was a miasma of beliefs, the trinity that emerged as official dogma was one of those beliefs.
That’s not how I see the Triune Nature of the Godhead at all, nor do I follow church creeds. Just the biblical scriptures…


“The Bible presents a God who did not need to create any beings to experience love, communion and fellowship. This God is complete in Himself, being three Persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit, separate and distinct, yet at the same time eternally one God. They loved and communed and fellowshiped with each other and took counsel together before the universe, angels or man were brought into existence. Isaiah "heard the voice of the Lord [in eternity past] saying, "Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?" (Isa:6:8
). Moses revealed the same counseling together of the Godhead: "And God said, Let usmake man in our image, after our likeness"; and again, "Let us go down, and there confound their language" (Gen:1:26
;11:7). Who is this "us" if God is a single entity? Why does God say, "The man is become as one of us" (Gen:3:22)?”


 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member

Trinity

Issac Newton called the Trinity 'theological gibberish."
LeftyLen said:
The Roman Trinity is an amalgamation of Greek philosophy, roman religion with some scripture. The creedal Trinity enforced at Nicaea was politically enforced by imperial decree, forced by a very shrewd but corrupt Emperor. Thats your debate point.

LeftyLen said:
'I and the Father are one"-- yes in goal , plan of salvation.

  • I and the Father are one: (John 10:30)
  • Before Abraham was, I am
  • If you've seen me, you've seen the Father
Good points by friend @LeftyLen , thanks.
Jesus never said that he was literally god, it is others (Paulines) who are made to misunderstand him.

Regarsds
 
Top