Ponder This
Well-Known Member
You don't care about compensation for Khashoggi's family. You don't care about trials for the murderers. Your hatred of the Crown Prince is really a facade hiding your TDS.Justice would entail not making lucrative deals with the Saudis that enrich Trump and his family.
Wait, so you do still blame Trump for the trial that happened under the Biden administration granting the Crown Prince immunity? I should've realized the TDS was too strong in you.Nothing has been amended.
It speaks directly to the point that these trials against Trump are political lawfare.Who cares? This is nothing more than a deflection.
Well, that didn't change anything.Look up antisocial personality disorder in the DSM.
I point out policies and you try to act like they aren't policies. In particular, I pointed out the Remain in Mexico policy. Is it that you don't know what the Remain in Mexico policy is? It's where assylum claimants trying to enter from Mexico that aren't claiming assylum from Mexico must wait in Mexico while their assylum claims are considered. You keep bringing up "Build the Wall" which means to secure the border from illegal entry and includes building and rebuilding wall along the border to prevent illegal entry as well as making having border agents patrol and catch people trying to enter illegally. Another policy is Mexico Paying for the Wall, which is that the Mexican army patrols its side of the border. There is also Ending Catch and Release, which is to end the policy of catching illegals and releasing them into the U.S.No, he hasn't and probably never will. "Build a wall" isn't a cohesive policy for anything.
Notice how I just asked you to provide some policy of his and this was your response instead.
I happen to believe that people have inalienable rights that governments are not permitted to violate and that the government is not permitted to engage in corrupt actions (this includes not being permitted to criminalize actions which are not criminal).Uh yeah, that's usually what happens when people commit crimes. I"m all for going after people who commit crimes. Aren't you?
I challenged your knowledge of basic facts about Jan 6 because you claimed you were well informed by watching the Jan 6 committee (which was a political hit job against Trump), and it would seem that you are not so well informed by watching the Jan 6 committee. If you want to continue to claim that Trump is an insurrectionist and that you are well informed about Jan 6th because you watched the committee, then drop some knowledge on us, and if you can't, then retract your claim that the Jan 6 committee so well informed you.This was in response to, "Do you think these are arguments that an insurrection didn't actually happen or .... what? What are you trying to say here?"
So, you think there was no insurrection .... ?
Why don't you believe Hillary thinks Trump stole the 2016 election from her? Do you think she is lying? She's repeated her remarks multiple times in the media.No, I don't.
The TDS is all yours if you think that Clinton and Trump are on equal footing on this one. That's completely irrational and contrary to the facts.
I didn't say "whether good or bad" and your arguments have been bad. But by definition, if you do nothing but attack, then how is it not fair if I defend? What are you saying? That because you do nothing but attack, it would only be fair if I didn't defend? Ridiculous!You think it's fair to defend everything Trump has done, whether good or bad, because I've "attacked everything he has done?" Wha?
It seems that you said so, but if it was in error, then I am happy if we can correct it.Who said it was?
I didn't find that exact quote anywhere, but looking into it, I've decided that you've made a fair point! Trump called for a ban on muslims entering the country.He actually said the words I quoted.
Ohh he only banned immigration (including refugees) from specific Muslim countries so it's not xenophobic then? Please tell me that isn't your argument.
But I think that Trump was actually concerned about terrorism as opposed to intrinsically disliking Muslims. And that's why, for example, Iraq was removed from the travel ban.Mr. Trump stated, "Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life."
The fact of the matter is that legal immigration is good (as opposed to the illegal kind).The fact of the matter is that migrants/refugees/immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than natural born citizens do. I think the reasons are obvious.
So when Trump specifically calls out examples such as Laken Riley, who was raped and murdered, do you interpret that as lies, insults, or whining?Both. Have you read a transcript of any of his speeches yet? English is my first language and I'm well versed in it. That's how I know he's just saying is basically nothing (and a lot of lies and BS).
There's a lot of "if you look at what's happening in ... " and "Look at what they're doing in ... " without any further explanation as to what's going on or being done. It's a lot of vague references to nothing, lies, endless insults and childish name calling, complaints and whining.
Indeed, your use of the word "comprehensive" was nonsense.Nonsense.
LoL, Chris Hayes, he should never read a transcript again, he's so bad at it!Compared to every single other person you mentioned here (save for maybe Haley), Trump's speeches are juvenile, rambling and borderline incoherent. I think your admiration of him is blocking your ability to see that.
Are you upset that Trump didn't answer the question the way you wanted?