Orban went to the US to promote peace between Europe and Russia.
His ally Fitso, Slovak PM was shot after he announced that he would promote dialogue with Russia.
This shows how desperate these warmongers are.
And how low they can stoop.
We are the promoters of peace.
Orbin was discouraged from speaking with Putin by Mitchel if I'm not mistaken, and Fitso was shot after announcing intent to promote peaceful relations with Russia. I'm curious about the war machine in play.
Russia doesn't appear to have any intentions of backing off, China is claiming neutral, yet has money involved both there and in the States. China's leveraging is noted and very likely important to the overall equation. This seems to be a multi-faceted leveraging, both in position and ability.
Ukraine is and has been under fire, Nato is beginning to move a little more than in recent history, and the United States is under current leadership transitions, not long after the UK made a move away from their normal conservative stance. Most of Europe remains on the right side of the fence, and I'm curious how this all plays into your comment about Orbin and Fitso and why you view NATO to be the real "warmongers".
It seems to me that a one way street has presented itself, and while many if not most of us would prefer peace, peace doesn't appear to be something on the plate of our world leaders.
To be a promoter of peace, what is needed?