Perhaps he wanted to schedule a home invasion & burglary?
Dearest, I have had many more men than the aforementioned J. Carroll ever will.
And I am still young.
So...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Perhaps he wanted to schedule a home invasion & burglary?
First this was a civil lawsuit, not criminal. The jury only has to hear the evidence and conclude it was more likely true that the claims of harm are true. The jury wasn't sure if an actual rape occurred since Carroll wasn't certain herself as Trump attacked her violently. The jury was convinced a sexual assault happened, and that he defamed her. The jury had one MAGA member and even he agreed that Trump likely did these acts. They came back with a decision in about 3 hours which is facst, so the evidence was very compelling.Juridically, the onus is on the victim.
Did she prove she was raped 27 years ago?
She wasn't raped in Rome, so irrelevant. Women have long striggled to get justice for sexual assault and that is chancing, which is a good thing. For as much as America claims to be family friendly there is still a lot of discrimination against women. These negative biases is a hallmark of conservatives these days.She hasn't, as far as I am concerned and according to the Roman Law judicial systems.
If a man rapes a woman that is a sick man who committed crimes. Trump is one of these sick people.It's like I said: "Leonardo Di Caprio raped me, some years ago, and the onus is on him, to prove it didn't happened".
It's insane. It's more than insane. It's twisted and sick.
Interesting.First this was a civil lawsuit, not criminal. The jury only has to hear the evidence and conclude it was more likely true that the claims of harm are true. The jury wasn't sure if an actual rape occurred since Carroll wasn't certain herself as Trump attacked her violently. The jury was convinced a sexual assault happened, and that he defamed her. The jury had one MAGA member and even he agreed that Trump likely did these acts. They came back with a decision in about 3 hours which is facst, so the evidence was very compelling.
She wasn't raped in Rome, so irrelevant. Women have long striggled to get justice for sexual assault and that is chancing, which is a good thing. For as much as America claims to be family friendly there is still a lot of discrimination against women. These negative biases is a hallmark of conservatives these days.
If a man rapes a woman that is a sick man who committed crimes. Trump is one of these sick people.
It's not disagrement like coke is better than pepsi, it is vastly more severe a type of irrational belief. It's almost a criminal mindset, how else could a voter support a criminal candidate?What I hear is that they support Trump because he (unlike
Biden) loves this country, & his agendas are best for it.
(I disagree with them.)
Nothing at all alike. It's clear Clinton had affairs, but sexual assault?This is somewhat similar to how Democrats supported
Bill Clinton, despite his sexual predation. It's about
2 things....
1) Compartmentalization of thinking.
2) Priorities.
Why bother posting at all when you aren't even informed on the topic? You post all sorts of nonsense and create irrelevant tangents, and then have no idea what the trial is about. You're on the internet, you have access to reputal news. Use it.Interesting.
I am not understanding how he defamed her.
What did he say?
I did read the reputable sources.Why bother posting at all when you aren't even informed on the topic? You post all sorts of nonsense and create irrelevant tangents, and then have no idea what the trial is about. You're on the internet, you have access to reputal news. Use it.
The difference between me and you, is that you believe that if a woman lies before the Government, that is the judicial system, she will not have any consequence in the afterlife, since there is no afterlife.Where's that <optimistic> frubal when ya need it, eh.
Your opinion is worthless in the face of facts.I did read the reputable sources.
In my opinion, there's no evidence that an assault or rape has ever taken place.
Period.
Really?It's not disagrement like coke is better than pepsi...
Sexual assault, including rape.......it is vastly more severe a type of irrational belief. It's almost a criminal mindset, how else could a voter support a criminal candidate?
Nothing at all alike. It's clear Clinton had affairs, but sexual assault?
Insurrection is a separate issue....the far more serious one (IMO).Even if Clinton had a similar track record of sexual misconduct as Trump, Clinton never put American democracy at risk.
Are you defending Clinton's sexual predationNot the same in the slightest. Voters never put America at risk like MAGA's havem and still do with their death threats against school board members and election officials, etc.
Well deserved.Kaching! Money!!
Yet your belief in hell hasn't stopped you from lying persistently here on the forum.The difference between me and you, is that you believe that if a woman lies before the Government, that is the judicial system, she will not have any consequence in the afterlife, since there is no afterlife.
We Christians believe that liars who ruin other people's lives end up in Hell. And there's no such a thing as God's mercy whenever something like that happens.
I am not saying she did lie, since I don't possess the absolute truth. I was speaking in general.
I'd say it's worse.In today's society I don't think defamation has the impact that it used to have.
Lyndon Larouche lives!!Possibly still Trump.
Yet your belief in hell hasn't stopped you from lying persistently here on the forum.
You really don't know what I believe....other than not believing in gods.The difference between me and you, is that you believe that if a woman lies before the Government, that is the judicial system, she will not have any consequence in the afterlife, since there is no afterlife.
Another non sequitur.We Christians believe that liars who ruin other people's lives end up in Hell. And there's no such a thing as God's mercy whenever something like that happens.
I am not saying she did lie, since I don't possess the absolute truth. I was speaking in general.
You really don't know what I believe....other than not believing in gods.
Another non sequitur.
After a lengthy trial, Trump was found liable for sexual assault & defamation.
Are you saying they were wrong, & that Trump is innocent?
If so, on what basis?
I wish he'd move to Mars.Don't worry...that after this mishap, Trump will move to Europe, disgusted by what the US politics has become.
Your view does explain how you can be so positive about Putin & Trump.I couldn't care less about worldly justice, as a Christian. It's ephemeral.
Man will return to the Moon after 50 years of waiting.I wish he'd move to Mars.
You haven't told me yet whether you believe in an afterlife...or not.Your view does explain how you can be so positive about Putin & Trump.
But I live in this world, & favor that justice be had now.
So let Ukraine crush the evil Russian invaders.
Let Trump suffer defeat in 2024.
And let SCOTUS begin to favor civil all liberties...not just the ones approved by the Pope.