Soandso
ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
How is he only going to have a "concept of a plan" when we are 2 months away from the election?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trump is losing the debate acting like a raving lunatic
- Thread starter F1fan
- Start date
How is he only going to have a "concept of a plan" when we are 2 months away from the election?
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Then he said something like "I don't know, I'm not the President right now."
You've only had nine years to think about it, dude.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
He will have someone read the project 2025 material to him.
It would take some extreme gyrations of logic and rationality to come to a different conclusion, imo. You can't even give it credence if you give it the wide metaphorical berth afforded to esoteric and mystical interpretations.
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
It was in response to a post that said the current inflation rate was the lowest in decades. That statement was wrong. I never talked about the cause of the 8% inflation rate.
We Never Know
No Slack
He admitted he doesn't have one yet which is why he allowed Obama care to stay in place.
But said if he comes up with a better plan he will replace Obama care.
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
OMG, did you read what I was responding to? You took this out of context and you know it. F1Fan said Trump was an idiot and I was just responding to show how stupid that comment was.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
I must have been napping when TDS became a thing. Be that as it may, I find myself less that fond of the label. Should a label prove useful, let me suggest ...
M I N X
- MISOGYNISTIC
- IGNORANT
- NARCISSISTIC
- XENOPHOBIC
Soandso
ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
Didn't he say the same thing the first time he was running for president?
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
So another example of not understanding what I posted. I was responding to someone that posted that the current inflation rate was the lowest in decades. That was wrong. I was not responding to a comment on the cause of inflation. Please read the context of my posts. It matters.And wow, is it ever a good thing that a world-wide pandemic never happened, requiring pumping money into the economy to keep millions upon millions from losing their incomes, businesses and homes! So glad we dodged that bullet.
You would do well to try to think what really caused that inflation you hate so much. A big part of it was Trump's mis-handling of that pandemic (oh, that never happened, sorry!
Clizby Wampuscat
Well-Known Member
The actual truth is no one is going to be swayed either way from this debate. Each side heard what they wanted to hear and probably could have written their response to it before the debate.
CNN Debate watchers polls:
Who is better at handling the economy : 55-35% Trump
Who understands their problemes more: 44-40% Harris
Who will handle immigration better: 23 point lead: Trump (Uh Oh)
Better commander in chief: 9 point lead: Trump
Did debate affect their choice for president : 96% No
Harris favorability: 45-44% Favorable
Trump 39-51 Unfavorable (Unchanged)
High confidence in Trump: 36%
High confidence in Harris: 32%
Loading…
www.cnn.com
PureX
Veteran Member
All in all I have to say that I think Trump did fairly well. He played the raging catastrophizer all the way through, which I am sure was his goal. For whatever reason, it's what his supporters really like to hear. And he was Trump the big tough billionaire that his sycophants imagine him to be, even if the things he claimed about himself and his opponent were mostly untrue. It looked true to his 'true believers', and they are who he was playing to.
Unfortunately for him, I don't think he did anything to dissuade his doubters. In fact, I think he probably gave them more reason to doubt, while Harris may well have inspired some confidence among the undecideds.
For myself, I was both a bit disappointed and a bit hopeful about Harris. Disappointed in that I was not hearing a lot of real and effective ideas for dealing with the myriad of economic issues that are strangling the middle and working classes in this country. Though the milquetoast propositions that she did mention were at least aimed in the right direction. And I suspect she was holding back on these issues in terms of specific intentions to avoid the endless socialist slander that inevitably comes in this country when anyone dares to address economic oppression. So I'm still holding some hope that if she wins, she will take stronger action in that regard. I do believe that in her heart, she does identify in that direction. Whereas Trump couldn't care less about the plight of the working "losers" in this country and has said as much on a number of occasions, and has shown it in his actions throughout his whole life.
Unfortunately for him, I don't think he did anything to dissuade his doubters. In fact, I think he probably gave them more reason to doubt, while Harris may well have inspired some confidence among the undecideds.
For myself, I was both a bit disappointed and a bit hopeful about Harris. Disappointed in that I was not hearing a lot of real and effective ideas for dealing with the myriad of economic issues that are strangling the middle and working classes in this country. Though the milquetoast propositions that she did mention were at least aimed in the right direction. And I suspect she was holding back on these issues in terms of specific intentions to avoid the endless socialist slander that inevitably comes in this country when anyone dares to address economic oppression. So I'm still holding some hope that if she wins, she will take stronger action in that regard. I do believe that in her heart, she does identify in that direction. Whereas Trump couldn't care less about the plight of the working "losers" in this country and has said as much on a number of occasions, and has shown it in his actions throughout his whole life.
And that is what this whole debate was about -- the undecideds. Nobody ever thought (sorry @Clizby Wampuscat) either was going to change their natural bases. It all comes down to the undecideds in battleground states. (By the way, it seems to me a pretty dumb system, that a few thousand voters in a small minority of states determines who sits as President for a whole nation, but hey, I'm a Canuck.)
I have news -- you can buy dead geese and ducks at the meat department in your grocery store.
How many "innocent women" participate in illegal, violent break-ins where windows and doors are being smashed to allow mobs to chase down and potentially kill government members? A jurist, you say? I confess to a small amount of doubt.
Unarmed person that could be arrested instead of being killed.
Too sexy