ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
I've demonstrated my claims, repeatedly. The onus is on you to demonstrate the truth of your claim. Now, "Haitians are known to eat cats" is the claim. Present facts. Inform me.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Trump is safe following shooting at Florida golf course; suspect detained
- Thread starter Evangelicalhumanist
- Start date
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Like you demonstrated your claim that I have RDS by showing no relevant facts, you mean?
Pogo
Well-Known Member
No, that is what we have an Intelligence Community in government for. That is also not the job of Congress and yes, anyone who presents information in public should do due diligence and not just repeat rumor. Not doing so should disqualify them from consideration for office.
We Never Know
No Slack
So you just basically agreed with what I said.
Politicians shouldn't spread rumors that aren't facts lol
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
How is that different to: "Politicians shouldn't spread stories that are not politically correct" ?
Pogo
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I agree with that and
Trump and Vance are egregiously violating that norm and disqualifying themselves for consideration for elective office.
We Never Know
No Slack
Not politically correct doesn't mean not fact.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
The facts that you've repeatedly made false claims? Yeah, I did that.
Where are your relevant facts to support your claims?
Pogo
Well-Known Member
There is a rather large difference between saying something unpopular but factual and outright lying.
Though you wouldn't understand this considering the evidence of the websites you reference.
Actually, there is not.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Tell me more about your non-existent facts.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
No, I've done plenty of that. How about your present evidence of your claims, for a change?
We'll start with your claim, in post 89, that "Haitians are known to eat cats".
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
OK, so how does that work when the MSM reports the news as if it were fact?
What I mean is, how does a report about someone's cat being eaten by Haitians in Ohio become "debunked"?
The report isn't politically correct because it show's Trump's policy in a positive light and Harris' policy in a negative light.
Do the original facts stop being facts because someone says that the story was debunked?
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
So why should those non-existent facts compel me to do what you want?
Trump's violent vengeful hostile rhetoric,
support for Putin, & attacks on Harris
are very likely related to increased risk
of assault on both presidential candidates.
support for Putin, & attacks on Harris
are very likely related to increased risk
of assault on both presidential candidates.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
It's called "investigation". If you find out that there's no actual evidence of a thing happening, and the only source of a claim that a thing happened was someone on Facebook saying someone told them that someone else told them that somebody else told them it happened, it's pretty obvious that an absolutely black and white claim of "this thing happened" is obviously baseless. So when a candidate for the most powerful office in the world just outright says IT'S TRUE, we can say it's not.
Does a fact stop being a fact when we find out that there is no good reason to believe it and every sign suggests it's made up?
Yes. That's a good reason to contest it.
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
You claimed in post 89 "Haitians are known to eat cats". What facts support this claim?
Any further dodging of this question is an admission that what you said was false.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
Why would evidence be relevant when the issue is about whether or not facts actually exist? Evidence and facts are different things.
Everyone has the responsibility to protect
oneself, even those protected by others.
While not legally required of one, self defense
includes eschewing unsafe behavior, eg, driving
around Detroit with a bumper sticker saying
I BRAKE FOR DARKIES
Trump is shirking this responsibility by
making inflammatory remarks likely to
inspire many to want him harmed/killed.
Ebionite
Well-Known Member
No, you don't get to make admissions on my behalf.