• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Puts Women Off Sex. Surprise

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
One of the things noted in the article is that the difference was not due to young men voting for Trump (which they expected), but it didn't seem to chime with as many young women as anticipated.

From the article:

Yeah, I caught that. One of the factors I was considering was how Trump's anti-lgbtq+ messaging was going to influence people based on the fact that the population is more open and more and more people know someone from that community, making these issues more visible.

It does stand to reason that women are also concerned about men's issues given that they have men they care about. What doesn't quite vibe with me here is how the side of masculinity that leads to toxic male behavior is the one that won out.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Ok. How did Walz not show these qualities during the riots?
3 days of watching the city burn is a strong indicator of that what is not the type of leader one would want in such situations that would lead to a positive outcome. People who were on the receiving end, don't forget such things.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Ok. How did Walz not show these qualities during the riots?
Manliness is highly subjective, so Magas can easily
convince themselves that Waltz is girly, & that Vance
is manly. She seems to really enjoy being a girl.
vance_in_wig_and_dress.jpg
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Yeah, I caught that. One of the factors I was considering was how Trump's anti-lgbtq+ messaging was going to influence people based on the fact that the population is more open and more and more people know someone from that community, making these issues more visible.

It does stand to reason that women are also concerned about men's issues given that they have men they care about. What doesn't quite vibe with me here is how the side of masculinity that leads to toxic male behavior is the one that won out.

One lesson I hope is learned from all of this is that one can't make any assumptions based on "voting blocs." People are individuals who think for themselves, regardless of race, gender, or other form of identity they might be grouped into. Political analysts sometimes try to pigeonhole people based on assumptions what someone in a given demographic is "supposed" to think.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Well then you use that to counteract the argument yourself. You don't keep telling them to post every single detail and every single link that you want to see and dismiss all those you don't want to and demand more sources.

It's a ridiculously stupid tactic to frustrate and annoy ones opponent. That's the bottom line.
I don't know, you aren't doing to good with this "just look it up" thing you're preaching.
The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi, shortened from Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat – the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies) is the obligation on a party in a dispute to provide sufficient warrant for its position.
Perhaps quit being low information and being out to frustrate and annoy (like your numerous, off-topic whataboutit posts) and try harder to keep up with standards that have been in practice for a very long time and for a very good reason.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I don't know, you aren't doing to good with this "just look it up" thing you're preaching.

Perhaps quit being low information and being out to frustrate and annoy (like your numerous, off-topic whataboutit posts) and try harder to keep up with standards that have been in practice for a very long time and for a very good reason.
Well my posts will be for you to deal with, or to just flat out ignore if you desire. I really don't care one way or another.
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
I hope they continue, personally. The women attempting it will learn a valuable lesson. The withholding of intimacy as a weapon doesn't work. But fools will repeat the mistakes of history.
Rather than listen to the concerns of women about VIOLENCE, your response is to mock us. You can make any argument you want at this point. You have already revealed the kind of man [sic] you are.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Rather than listen to the concerns of women about VIOLENCE, your response is to mock us. You can make any argument you want at this point. You have already revealed the kind of man [sic] you are.
No, I'm mocking idiotic responses make by people that in this instance just happen to be women. A difference I doubt you get. Furthermore these women [sic] are the ones revealing what they really are.
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
No, I'm mocking idiotic responses make by people that in this instance just happen to be women. A difference I doubt you get. Furthermore these women [sic] are the ones revealing what they really are.
What you are doing is a form of gaslighting. For those unfamiliar with the word, gaslighting is when you try to convince someone their ideas or feelings or responses are nuts. Usually gaslighting happens in very small ways, like telling someone they are just trying to cause drama, or that they are being hypersensitive, or that they can't take a joke. And Shaul that is exactly what you have done with the response of these women to sexual violence by telling them they are overreacting.
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
They are basically becoming nuns without joining a monastery, complete with the head shaving. Do an image search for Korean Buddhist Nuns.
 
Last edited:

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Honestly I had never heard of the word strongman before reading certain posts here...

I guess the strongman is a politician, if I am not mistaken, that is self-confident. A strong man who knows what has to be done, and that loves action, and not sterile words.

An alpha male that is proud of being male and heterosexual.

All that produces confusion and fear towards such men...especially from other men, and women.

I think there are sexual issues involved.

The feminist movement has decided that men have to be submissive...and from a sexual standpoint, I guess more and more feminists (pardon me but I need to go into detail) will choose the Amazons' horse ride in that particular intimate moment with their own husband, so that means that they are not the passive part, that they are not submitted by their own husband. That they are in control.

Even sex plays a role in the so called war on patriarchy.

And so...the result is more and more "beta males" that have been forced to accept this passive role imposed on them by these phallic, alpha women.

Eve vs Lilith.
 
Top