How mature of you.I have to assume that if I was a woman I would not want intimacy with Trump supporters either.
Come to think of it, that does not depend on me being a woman. Nor does it end with physical intimacy.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How mature of you.I have to assume that if I was a woman I would not want intimacy with Trump supporters either.
Come to think of it, that does not depend on me being a woman. Nor does it end with physical intimacy.
Or they will take inspiration from A Handmaids TaleThe MAGA solution of course will be very Trumpian: rape the woman.
I am sorry that I can't return the compliment.How mature of you.
Is it really that doctors are so afraid to intervene, or is it actually that they're being political and they're doing this to "game" the system? Is it really the actual doctors themselves, or is it "healthcare" administrators and legal teams, who the doctors have to answer to, who are engaging in a fearmongering and intimidation campaign to scare them and the public? If I wasn't pro-life and had a bottom line agenda of money and profit, that's what I'd be doing.There are states such as Texas where doctors are so afraid to perform an abortion, that a woman has to be half dead before they intervene, and sometimes that means it is too late. Women have died. Would you say that qualifies as medical support they had but is now lost?
Makes good sense....
The way the Texas laws are set up is that allows any member of the public to file a civil suit for $10k against anyone except the mother connected with an abortion. Opportunistic bounty hunters should not be involved in health care. This is in addition to the the state laws involving steep fines, loss of medical license, and prison.Is it really that doctors are so afraid to intervene, or is it actually that they're being political and they're doing this to "game" the system? Is it really the actual doctors themselves, or is it "healthcare" administrators and legal teams, who the doctors have to answer to, who are engaging in a fearmongering and intimidation campaign to scare them and the public? If I wasn't pro-life and had a bottom line agenda of money and profit, that's what I'd be doing.
That's a state problem, no? Trump hasn't taken office yet, he hasn't changed any laws, so the existing law is what people are concerned about, not the fact that Trump won the election a few days ago. He also stated that it would continue to be a state issue. So basically, nothing changed.A pregnant teenager died after trying to get care in three visits to Texas emergency rooms
It took 20 hours and three ER visits before doctors admitted the pregnant 18-year-old to the hospital as her condition worsened. She’s one of at least two women who died under Texas’ abortion ban.www.texastribune.org
No. As far as I know the Texas law was already in place when Trump won and he isn't going to interfere so if the law doesn't match people's needs, that's not related to the election a few days ago. It's a different subject. And why are people having a fit in so many other states where the Texan law doesn't apply?There are states such as Texas where doctors are so afraid to perform an abortion, that a woman has to be half dead before they intervene, and sometimes that means it is too late. Women have died. Would you say that qualifies as medical support they had but is now lost?
Many other states also have laws banning abortion.And why are people having a fit in so many other states where the Texan law doesn't apply?
It's not a compliment. Get over yourself.I am sorry that I can't return the compliment.
Because I truly can not.
Why would doctors risk their patients and their careers to do that???Is it really that doctors are so afraid to intervene, or is it actually that they're being political and they're doing this to "game" the system? Is it really the actual doctors themselves, or is it "healthcare" administrators and legal teams, who the doctors have to answer to, who are engaging in a fearmongering and intimidation campaign to scare them and the public? If I wasn't pro-life and had a bottom line agenda of money and profit, that's what I'd be doing.
There was a Supreme Court ruling called Roe V Wade that guaranteed a woman's right to abortion up to viability which became a Federal standard for about 50 years. Then, Trump, during his first term in office, installed three conservative supreme court justices. The State of Missississippi then passed a law banning abortion after 15 weeks. This law was challenged by Jackson Women's Health Organization as unconstitutional, citing Roe v Wade, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court. Of course, the now 6-3 conservative majority of the court reversed the protections of Roe v Wade, and the federal protections were lost, sending it back to the States. Conservative states then went on an abortion banning spree.That's a state problem, no? Trump hasn't taken office yet, he hasn't changed any laws, so the existing law is what people are concerned about, not the fact that Trump won the election a few days ago. He also stated that it would continue to be a state issue. So basically, nothing changed.
Honestly I don't see the word pagan or polytheist as offensive...if addressed to Christians like me.While that's very poetic , it's not literally true. Our DNA does seem to hardwire us for religion, but the specifics of how that expresses itself varies from religious culture to religious culture, whether animism, pantheism, polytheism, henotheism, monotheism, etc. etc. There are those who begin life as Christians and become neo-pagans (or whatever). And there are people who start out life as neo-pagans, and become Christians (or whatever).
That's a state problem, no? Trump hasn't taken office yet, he hasn't changed any laws, so the existing law is what people are concerned about, not the fact that Trump won the election a few days ago. He also stated that it would continue to be a state issue. So basically, nothing changed.
Oh, it is very much a compliment. Get real. You should not expect protection that you neither deserve nor ask for.It's not a compliment. Get over yourself.
I wasn't saying you were being mature. The opposite, in fact. What "protections" are you talking about???Oh, it is very much a compliment. Get real. You should not expect protection that you neither deserve nor ask for.
Yes. They are afraid of being sued and losing their licenses. And it is the reason so many OB Gyns are leaving Texas.Is it really that doctors are so afraid to intervene,
No. There is zero evidence of that.or is it actually that they're being political and they're doing this to "game" the system?
Yes, it is the doctors themselves.Is it really the actual doctors themselves,
Texas' new anti-abortion law is known as Senate Bill 8 (SB 8), also called the Texas Heartbeat Act. It was passed on May 19, 2021, and went into effect on September 1, 2021. IOW, this law was passed after the overturn of Roe, which itself was largely due to the Supreme Court Justices appointed by Trump.No. As far as I know the Texas law was already in place when Trump won and he isn't going to interfere so if the law doesn't match people's needs, that's not related to the election a few days ago. It's a different subject.
Because Texas is not the only state to have enacted these sorts of laws. It's just the best known. 14 states implemented near-total abortion bans: Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and North Dakota. Other states, like Indiana and South Carolina, passed strict limits on abortion based on gestational age, such as six-week bans.And why are people having a fit in so many other states where the Texan law doesn't apply?
Nor am I applying the word pagan in a value laden way. I was trying to be simply descriptive.Honestly I don't see the word pagan or polytheist as offensive...if addressed to Christians like me.
I disagree. I am both a feminist and extremely anti-Trump, and I think men are amazingly wonderful. Accusing the loyal opposition of misandry is really not a whole lot different from accusing MAGA sorts of being misogynist.What I mean is that this anti-Trumpism is fueled by strong misandry.
I'm not sure where you get this from. There is nothing about the B4 movement that implies women are frigid. Voluntary celibacy is not the same thing as frigidity.And the conception that women are all frigid creatures who don't enjoy sex, and so men have to beg them, implore them to have sex.
You think that women responding to a threat of death is "abnormal"? Talk about gaslighting.That's the image I get, whenever I see abnormal reactions like this.
Again, the 4B movement has absolutely nothing to do with women enjoying sex or not. It is a movement about violence against women, and the fact that less drastic attempts draw attention to this have gone unnoticed by men. They say insanity is repeating the same action and expecting a different outcome. Women saw that prior methods didn't succeed, so they changed their strategy.In Europe I see nothing but economically independent women who enjoy having sex with men...and are proud of saying it publicly.
So they don't do any favor to men.
Whatever you think.Projection.