Churchill was the best choice for Britain in the 1940s, no question there. However, just because he has many great achievements(one of them being going it alone against the greatest monster to ever live), does not mean he was without great faults. The only reason there was relatively little brutal repression in British colonies during his era as PM is because he was busy using the armed forces to stop the Austrian Corporal. I do not wish to think of what would've happened in the Raj if he did not need the army to defend the Kingdom proper. Would it compare to ANYTHING Hitler was doing? No, ****ing hell no, anyone who claims that is frankly a moron.
But it is equally moronic to think it would've been pleasant.