Like what? The only things that we can say are absolute truth in a scripture are history and science. Scientific accuracies could have been a lucky guess, a coincidence, or the result of some method lost to time.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Try to prove to me your religion.
- Thread starter Taylor Seraphim
- Start date
anonymous9887
bible reader
Well how many lucky guesses do they have to be so that we can no longer consider them lucky guesses?
anonymous9887
bible reader
Exodus 6:3 is also another one.
anonymous9887
bible reader
The name is literally in the torah 100s of times.
There is also the very likely possibility that they had technology lost to time. There are a number of ancient structures for which we still don't know the method of construction, there's no reason that if construction methods have been lost, astronomical and other scientific methods couldn't have been lost as well.
anonymous9887
bible reader
As a matter of facts YHWH is used more in the torah then the word elohim=god itself.
anonymous9887
bible reader
How about describing things about the bottom of the sea, the shape of the earth, the earth hanging on nothing.
Also evidence supporting that there was many other popular ideas at the time, why would the bible conveniently hold the truth?
The shape of the earth and the earth hanging on nothing are astronomical things, I already addressed this. Things at the bottom of the sea could have washed to shore, or maybe they had deep sinking fishing cages. While the bible may hold some truth, it also holds some inaccuracies. If something was divine word it would have no inaccuracies at all.
Actually, that's not completely true, but that
anonymous9887
bible reader
What are the inaccuracies?
Jabar
“Strive always to excel in virtue and truth.”
It does not matter what the name is either way Allah=Yahweh. As long as you believe in God.
It is better to call God as Allah. It will prevent misconceptions from the Trinity.
anonymous9887
bible reader
I'm sure stream can't wash up on shore, streams at the bottom of the sea.
Mountains haven't washed up on shore at least for thousands of years there is no record of it.
Jabar
“Strive always to excel in virtue and truth.”
I would agree that Bible has inaccuracies. However, the Qur'an is divine and has none.
anonymous9887
bible reader
Well I respect your thought, but that is evading the problem not solving it.
Jabar
“Strive always to excel in virtue and truth.”
How so?
anonymous9887
bible reader
Well again I'm sure you have not seen them, but there is contradictions, look at what christian scholars have to say and you will see. Along with the fact that the Qur'an was corrupted. Their is a major contradiction in islam, according to the Qur'an all we need is the Qur'an, so what do we need the hadith for?
anonymous9887
bible reader
Because the question is if god in the torah uses YHWH and Jesus confirms this in the New testament as gods name(here are the problems)
Why doesn't mohammed use it or reveal it?
Did Yahweh just change his name?
It must have been significant to be in the torah 100s of times, and to be found historically, Jesus to quote passages containing Yahweh's name. The change does not add up all of a sudden.
Allah is a title.
How would you say the god of the Hindus in arabic?
It's called a paradox. There can be sense made out of seemingly contradictory statements. This seems like a philosophical issue, rather than a religious one. Though in any case, I'm finished arguing with you, any continuation is futile. Be well.
May Allah give you peace for defending the Truth.