lostwanderingsoul
Well-Known Member
Maybe they go together.So, the study of God should be the beginning of science?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Maybe they go together.So, the study of God should be the beginning of science?
Why not?Since G-d created nature or whatever G-d created is nature;does one mean that natural explanation is evidence of G-d ?
Regards
Was this issue presented to Jesus,please? If not, why take it negatively?
Regards
Is that story ,about Newton, a part of some science project taken up by science, please?
Regards
Truthful means correct. Does it help, please?What do you mean by 'truthful' here? 'Truthful' by what/whose standards?
Yes, that's right.I agree with one.
Science has never taken up the issue that "the truthful religion impedes or stalls the progress of science". It is not from science, it is a political notion of Atheism people to malign religion, I understand. Right,please?
Regards
"In any case, what atheists have claimed: "If there is no spirit then there cannot be any spirituality"?"
Please go through the posts of this thread, one will find the post where it has been claimed sort of Atheism who don't believe in spirit/soul yet they have spirituality, if I understood correctly. Right, please?
"What "religious knowledge" are you referring to? Religious beliefs are beliefs, not knowledge"
Knowledge has many disciplines, philosophical, religions, sciences etc, all for the purpose of understanding G-d creation. Right,please?
It's a good thing that other people ignored Newton's acquiescence to his religious beliefs.The story about Newton comes from HISTORY, which is not a science. In Newton's own writings he states that the orbits he couldn't explain were the 'unknowable hand of god' and thus could never be figured out. Leplay proved him to be wrong 100 years later.
[2:256]اَللّٰہُ لَاۤ اِلٰہَ اِلَّا ہُوَۚ اَلۡحَیُّ الۡقَیُّوۡمُ ۬ۚ لَا تَاۡخُذُہٗ سِنَۃٌ وَّ لَا نَوۡمٌ ؕ لَہٗ مَا فِی السَّمٰوٰتِ وَ مَا فِی الۡاَرۡضِ ؕ مَنۡ ذَا الَّذِیۡ یَشۡفَعُ عِنۡدَہٗۤ اِلَّا بِاِذۡنِہٖ ؕ یَعۡلَمُ مَا بَیۡنَ اَیۡدِیۡہِمۡ وَ مَا خَلۡفَہُمۡ ۚ وَ لَا یُحِیۡطُوۡنَ بِشَیۡءٍ مِّنۡ عِلۡمِہٖۤ اِلَّا بِمَا شَآءَ ۚ وَسِعَ کُرۡسِیُّہُ السَّمٰوٰتِ وَ الۡاَرۡضَ ۚ وَ لَا یَـُٔوۡدُہٗ حِفۡظُہُمَا ۚ وَ ہُوَ الۡعَلِیُّ الۡعَظِیۡمُ ﴿۲۵۶﴾Wrong again.
Some aspects of religion, and perhaps some aspects of philosophy, are concerned with achieving an understanding of mythical entities. Science certainly is not.
In any case, can you state some religious knowledge?
Wrong again.
Some aspects of religion, and perhaps some aspects of philosophy, are concerned with achieving an understanding of mythical entities. Science certainly is not.
In any case, can you state some religious knowledge?
Allah — there is no God but He, the Living, the Self-Subsisting and All-Sustaining. Slumber seizes Him not, nor sleep. To Him belongs whatsoever is in the heavens and whatsoever is in the earth. Who is he that will intercede with Him except by His permission? He knows what is before them and what is behind them; and they encompass nothing of His knowledge except what He pleases. His knowledge extends over the heavens and the earth; and the care of them burdens Him not; and He is the High, the Great.
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 2: Al-Baqarah
Right, please?
Regards
It is religious knowledge, please.So, your answer is that you cannot state some religious knowledge. All you can do is preach.
It's a good thing that other people ignored Newton's acquiescence to his religious beliefs.
What do you mean?The things will be the same even if there is no science. Right,please?
Regards
Things like EVP, eye witness accounts/sightings, photograph, etc.Seriously, I know of zero evidence for a separate "spirit." I can't see gravity, but I can demonstrate it with ease. Nobody can see quantum spin, but it's used every day in MRI machines to provide detailed looks inside people's bodies.
Nobody, however, has ever produced a single means of demonstrating the existence of a spirit outside of the workings of the physical and chemical workings of the human body.
Things like EVP, eye witness accounts/sightings, photograph, etc.
It's there, however, the real question lies in the quality. This is where the ability to evaluate evidence comes in.
Nevertheless, it is the evidence presented, with courts putting a high value on eyewitness accounts despite the problems with that form of evidence.EVP is nonsense. It's people hearing whatever they want in static. Eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable, and photographs can easily be faked and/or misinterpreted. Just look at the Solway Firth spaceman photo, for example.
Nevertheless, it is the evidence presented, with courts putting a high value on eyewitness accounts despite the problems with that form of evidence.
Depends what you mean by "great religions", Ahmadiyya teaches homeopathy1. Here is an Ahmadi website attacking the view that humans evolved from apes2 3,No truthful founder of any great religions ever opposed science. Right,please?
Regards
As I said, you cannot give any example of any religious knowledge you have.It is religious knowledge, please.
Regards