McBell
Unbound
As important as telling someone the history of the clock instead of answering the question "what time is it?"Does one mean that history has no importance,please?
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As important as telling someone the history of the clock instead of answering the question "what time is it?"Does one mean that history has no importance,please?
Regards
Meaningless.One doesn't have a taste of it. Right, please?
Regards
Who told you that lie?I understand, the success rate of science is also because of the accepting of the prayer by G-d as per the truthful religion.
One become sentimental. Right, please?Who told you that lie?
Einstein was very successful in providing new science. Einstein did not believe in your g---d. Einstein felt belief in religions was childish.
James Watson was very successful in providing new science. James Watson did not believe in your g---d.
Google:That's because Watson realized that as a child he was not indoctrinated into silly superstitions.
Watson said, "The luckiest thing that ever happened to me was that my father didn't believe in God."
Do you know of any child who was indoctrinated into religious beliefs? I'll bet you do.
Which has been the emphasis on the quality of evidence. Whether evidence exists or not is one issue, the quality of the evidence is an entirely different issue. This is how we can say that evidence presented based on "i saw this person do that action" is at minimum needs subjected to high degrees of scrutinity. It could be good and accurate. Or, it may not be because we aren't that good at memory recall.
I understand, the success rate of science is also because of the accepting of the prayer by G-d as per the truthful religion. Right, please?
Regards
____________
[27:63]اَمَّنۡ یُّجِیۡبُ الۡمُضۡطَرَّ اِذَا دَعَاہُ وَ یَکۡشِفُ السُّوۡٓءَ وَ یَجۡعَلُکُمۡ خُلَفَآءَ الۡاَرۡضِ ؕ ءَ اِلٰہٌ مَّعَ اللّٰہِ ؕ قَلِیۡلًا مَّا تَذَکَّرُوۡنَ ﴿ؕ۶۳﴾
Or, Who answers the distressed person when he calls upon Him, and removes the evil, and makes you successors in the earth? Is there a God besides Allah? Little is it that you reflect.
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 27: An-Naml
Does one mean that history has no importance,please?
I decide for myself with the tools available according to the nature of problems/issues. Right,please?
Regards
Turning to G-d does not stall progress of science.
Does it ?
It has nothing to do with sentiment. It has everything to do with your nonsense claims about your religion.One become sentimental. Right, please?
Regards
One's understanding is wrong.It has nothing to do with sentiment. It has everything to do with your nonsense claims about your religion.
"Ultimately all science and all advancement is from individuals and "turning to God" has a different meaning and different effect on each individual. In some people the concept of "God" might be a handy explanation for every single question and anomaly and this might greatly impact the ability of that individual to solve mysteries or invent a solution to a problem."It depends on what you mean by "turning to God".
Ultimately all science and all advancement is from individuals and "turning to God" has a different meaning and different effect on each individual. In some people the concept of "God" might be a handy explanation for every single question and anomaly and this might greatly impact the ability of that individual to solve mysteries or invent a solution to a problem. Other individuals might be strongly motivated to pursue science in homage to the God they believe exists. These would be the two extremes but I believe most people lie somewhere in the middle near where their belief in a deity is largely irrelevant to their willingness or ability to learn, understand, and practice science.
Of far more concern than a belief in religion is that we all are a slave to each of our beliefs. It's largely the belief in our own omniscience and the omniscience of science that makes anomalies invisible to us. It is chiefly anomalies and their study that creates progress in individual understanding of science and in human progress. We can't study what we can't see and we can't see what lies outside of our beliefs.
"It's largely the belief in our own omniscience and the omniscience of science that makes anomalies invisible to us."It depends on what you mean by "turning to God".
Ultimately all science and all advancement is from individuals and "turning to God" has a different meaning and different effect on each individual. In some people the concept of "God" might be a handy explanation for every single question and anomaly and this might greatly impact the ability of that individual to solve mysteries or invent a solution to a problem. Other individuals might be strongly motivated to pursue science in homage to the God they believe exists. These would be the two extremes but I believe most people lie somewhere in the middle near where their belief in a deity is largely irrelevant to their willingness or ability to learn, understand, and practice science.
Of far more concern than a belief in religion is that we all are a slave to each of our beliefs. It's largely the belief in our own omniscience and the omniscience of science that makes anomalies invisible to us. It is chiefly anomalies and their study that creates progress in individual understanding of science and in human progress. We can't study what we can't see and we can't see what lies outside of our beliefs.
I could be right or wrong ultimately it is the individual who has to decide for his actions, the truthful religions does not force anybody.Okay, so you decide what counts as a truthful religion?
Isn't it not a biased approach, please?Not to the point at hand.
I could be right or wrong ultimately it is the individual who has to decide for his actions, the truthful religions does not force anybody.
Is it wrong, please?
Regards
The truthful religion and its guidance is there, but I could make mistakes with omission or commission, I am a human. Right,please?So are you saying that there is a chance that you could be right or wrong in deciding what is a truthful religion?
The truthful religion and its guidance is there, but I could make mistakes with omission or commission, I am a human. Right,please?
Regards
Isn't it not a biased approach, please?
Regards
While making utmost endeavors to find a vaccine for the Corona-virus, it won't stall if they also turn to G-d. That is my understanding, please?
Regards