Secret Chief
Very strong language
Soon to be irrelevant, Sunak will be gone as soon as the tories lose the general election. Being married to a billionaire heiress will soften the blow.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
He has struck me as remarkably unremarkable. BoJo was at least good for some jokes, inlcuding how his nickname sounds like a slang term for oral sex, lol.Soon to be irrelevant, Sunak will be gone as soon as the tories lose the general election. Being married to a billionaire heiress will soften the blow.
Yeah he's total vanilla. He's just desperately foraging for votes.He has struck me as remarkably unremarkable. BoJo was at least good for some jokes, inlcuding how his nickname sounds like a slang term for oral sex, lol.
This is exactly the sort of thing I think is an utter waste of time to discuss.Talk amongst yourselves:
What are Mr. Sunak's credetials that any of us should pay attention to his take on this complex and difficult issue?Talk amongst yourselves:
Promise nit to keep asking hiw counterpoints are relevant and to start using a dictionary rather than asking what so many words mean?So far it seems like the responses have been that what Sunak said is transphobic. Is that a fair summary?
So what I genuinely want to understand is why anyone here thinks what he said is transphobic. Is anyone will to explain that? To be fair, I might well have questions about your explanations, I'm hoping to have an actual conversation and dig into why Sunak's comments are viewed as transphobic.
thanks!
What are Mr. Sunak's credetials that any of us should pay attention to his take on this complex and difficult issue?
Could you be more disingenuous?I have complained about nothing.
Why would you choose to deliberately misinterpret what I've said here? I have done nothing but ask simple questions about the claims of other posters.
In what way(s) have I been disingenuous?Could you be more disingenuous?
You're just looking for another way to grind your axe. Obvious to everyone but (apparently) yourself.In what way(s) have I been disingenuous?
So far it seems like the responses have been that what Sunak said is transphobic. Is that a fair summary?
So what I genuinely want to understand is why anyone here thinks what he said is transphobic. Is anyone will to explain that? To be fair, I might well have questions about your explanations, I'm hoping to have an actual conversation and dig into why Sunak's comments are viewed as transphobic.
thanks!
Because neither Sunak, nor (I think) the majority of us is qualified to actually discuss the issue as the medical and/or psychological issue that it is.This is exactly the sort of thing I think is an utter waste of time to discuss.
That's what I was going to say. Noice.Rishi Sunak is a politician, not a medical expert stating a peer-reviewed position. His views don't override those of medical organizations.
Hear hear, well said. Spot on.Public services are underfunded, the economy is moribund, the housing market is broken, and while a very few very wealthy people are better off, the rest of us are all experiencing varying levels of economic pain.
I did not say that at all! I asked what are his credentials, that would make it worth my while to listen to his opinion. As a matter of fact, what are my credentials? I'll tell you -- none. And in that case, why would you be interested in my opinion, either?I take it you disagree with Sunak? Can you explain your thinking?
Tough topic. No matter what side of the issue you take, you will lose. I gave a thumbs up for your guts to even bring it up.Talk amongst yourselves:
In what way(s) have I been disingenuous?