• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Universal Salvation?

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
Universal salvation somehow implies non-believers are bound by the beliefs of Christianity?

Totally illogical.
That's not what universal salvation means to me. To me, it means that all will be saved from the permanance of death to something much grander than this life.
 

logician

Well-Known Member
To further clariify, if I insist that salvation does not include me, (is not universal) and you insist it does, what makes your belief better than mine?
 

Ant0nio

Member
AS an atheist I don't believe in any salvation, therefore, by definition, salvation cannot be universal.

I don't blame you. I don't blame agnostics for doubting the existence of God.

Universal salvation is real. It is not exclusive to any religion, race, color, creed, background.

It may take longer for some than it does for others though lol.

It may take a few more lifetimes. But it is real.

But what if I proposed to you a method for you to prove to yourself without a shadow of a doubt that God truly exists?

What if I told you there is a method to literally visit the regions of Heaven while still living and go on with your daily life?

Understand that this method is in no way harmful to you or anyone else, does not conflict with any major religion, and is absolutely free.

If I told you how to learn this method, would you dare do what is necessary to learn it?

Understand what i'm saying. I can show you a way to absolutely PROVE to yourself that God exists. It has nothing to do with christianity or any religious dogma. It is a simple method to have a visual and audible experience of God.

And if you practice long and well enough, you may even visit heaven as you wish, in this lifetime!

I'm telling you the truth.

Well. What will you do now? Today I am literally handing you the key to the door of heaven.

Will you take it?
 

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
To further clariify, if I insist that salvation does not include me, (is not universal) and you insist it does, what makes your belief better than mine?
How about universal salvation means that salvation is OPEN to everyone who wants it, ie - does not deny anyone? If there's a party and you don't want to participate that's your prerogative.
 

Ant0nio

Member
Universal salvation by definition, includes all people. Regardless of race, color, creed, or religion even.

Eventually everybody returns to God.
 

logician

Well-Known Member
As an atheist I've always contended that needing saving from something as esoteric and hard to define as "sin" is quite illogical. The idea of "universal salvation" is illogical from it's basepoint.
 

Storm

ThrUU the Looking Glass
As an atheist I've always contended that needing saving from something as esoteric and hard to define as "sin" is quite illogical. The idea of "universal salvation" is illogical from it's basepoint.
I think logic is sometimes overrated. People conflate it with reason or rationality, when it's really just a tool to determine whether an argument/ position is internally sound. It tells us nothing about whether that position is right.
Case in point.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
As an atheist I've always contended that needing saving from something as esoteric and hard to define as "sin" is quite illogical. The idea of "universal salvation" is illogical from it's basepoint.
In what way is sin "hard to define?" It may be "hard for Logician to understand," but your lack of understanding does not constitute sin as "esoteric." The "basepoint" of sin is not your lack of understanding. The "basepoint" of sin is our propensity to wander off from communion with God. All have done that...all need reconciliation.
 

logician

Well-Known Member
In what way is sin "hard to define?" It may be "hard for Logician to understand," but your lack of understanding does not constitute sin as "esoteric." The "basepoint" of sin is not your lack of understanding. The "basepoint" of sin is our propensity to wander off from communion with God. All have done that...all need reconciliation.

Sorry, but there is no god, and no "sin" as you try to define it.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Sorry, but there is no god, and no "sin" as you try to define it.
Of course, you're able to stand completely apart from the universe, and are able, therefore, to objectively look both at the whole and its constituent parts, measure and qualify them, and come to this conclusion?
 
Top