No, Jay. It is a refusal to be commanded by one who has just failed to earn my respect.^ What a laughable evasion that was - laughable and transparent.
I trust you will understand why that is proper and often needed.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, Jay. It is a refusal to be commanded by one who has just failed to earn my respect.^ What a laughable evasion that was - laughable and transparent.
Are you running away from the subject?
What does religion got to do with Palestine?
In which sense is that running away from the subject?Are you running away from the subject?
What does religion got to do with Palestine?
Is there a solution to the Palestinian crises without peace?Since you want us to be frank, tell me: what reason does anyone have to expect peace in the Middle East, even hypothetically withount an Israel?
Are you insinuating that all Palestinian belong to the religion of Islam?I don't know, its Wednesday... perhaps we are destroying the Al Aqsa Mosque again. Its been pretty much a running-"gag" for the last 100 years.
Are you really saying that Religion has nothing to do with the Conflict? Really?
By definition, there is not.Is there a solution to the Palestinian crises without peace?
Now that is attempting to sidestep the subject, isn't it? It is hardly controversial that most Palestinians are muslims, nor that there is a strong, even decisive religious component to their motivations. Why are you implying that you disagree?Are you insinuating that all Palestinian belong to the religion of Islam?
Are you insinuating that all Palestinian belong to the religion of Islam?
In which sense is that running away from the subject?
You are saying quite bluntly that Arafat's death and some unespecified matter regarding Jerusalem are the decisive reasons for the lack of peace in Israel and the surrounding territory, and offering no support for that odd statement.
Then when it is pointed out that Arafat left the peace talks, you attempt to sidestep the discussion by claiming that he was killed for leaving the talks?
It really looks like you have simply decided that Israel must be to blame somehow and are just throwing random phrases in the hope that eventually one or more of them will look like they might support that hope.
Do you have knowledge of what took place under the Oslo accord regarding Jerusalem?
Its inclusion was a coup for the Palestinians without which the accord would never have been signed.
Arafat did go out of his way for peace and he was prepared to give up land for the sake of peace but all he asked was east Jerusalem be the capital of a future Palestinian State.The Zionist refusal in negotiating on the final status of Jerusalem brought about the breakdown of peace.Who do you blame the Palestinians?
The bottom line is the Zionist missed the boat.
They don't have to take any blame simply because they are at fault.Even taking for granted that what you say is completely true and accurate, that is still very poor arguing, to the point of being puzzling.
Do you expect Zionists to just take the blame for no good reason?
That may well be true (I am not up to date on the matter), but we are talking about accords from twenty years ago.They don't have to take any blame simply because they are at fault.
They were in breech of the Oslo accord.
Not yet but soon.
The Christian Palestinians are leaving en masse. Bethlehem isn't even a Christian city anymore.
Well one thing for sure you do lack knowledge on the subject of Palestine.That may well be true (I am not up to date on the matter), but we are talking about accords from twenty years ago.
Its very simple .What do you realistically expect Israel to do now? It is obviously not like they can simply decide to trust their neighbors not to attempt to attack them.
Then why did you expel them from 1948.Oh and it really is not my fault that Bethlehem is now a Muslim majority City
Its taking a mighty long time for you to accept it.But I get it, its all the Zionists fault.
Well one thing for sure you do lack knowledge on the subject of Palestine.
Its very simple .
Let the UN ,which created this mess in 1948, sort the mess out peacefully.
That'd be "the Zionists " fault if the Arabs had any actual claim to East JerusalemDo you have knowledge of what took place under the Oslo accord regarding Jerusalem?
Its inclusion was a coup for the Palestinians without which the accord would never have been signed.
Arafat did go out of his way for peace and he was prepared to give up land for the sake of peace but all he asked was east Jerusalem be the capital of a future Palestinian State.The Zionist refusal in negotiating on the final status of Jerusalem brought about the breakdown of peace.Who do you blame the Palestinians?
The bottom line is the Zionist missed the boat.