This year, next year, last year, the next decade, it's all irrelevant. What we are looking at is how many people have been executed and sentenced to death row, and what percentage are white, black, hispanic, and so on.
Then you're numbers are meaningless. There is no regularity with which executions are carried out over the course of 34 years, so no valid comparisons can be made.
Here's an example. Let's say you work a cash register at a retail store. Part of your job description is to sign people up for a membership card. More than that, you must have a 20% sign up rate in order to be an employee of good standing.
That could either be relative to one's total transactions, or relative to eligible transactions (i.e. transactions where the person doesn't have a card)
Now... if you have 634 transactions, and 574 of those already have membership cards, and the other 60 you sign up... you've got a 9.5% sign up rate relative to your total transactions.
If some other guy... we'll call him "Jim", has 5 transactions, and 4 of them have a card and one signs up, Jim has a 0.20% sign up rate relative to his total transactions.
Now, if I look at your percentages, I see that you're at 9.5%, and Jim is at 20%.... so even though you've been working harder, and have had more people using their membership cards, and you've signed up 60 times as many cards as Jim... you come across as a guy who hasn't been working hard enough. Why can't you be at 20% like Jim? Are you incompetent? Surely when you've got 634 customers, you can sign up more than 60, right?
Well no... you can't sign up a guy who already has a card. It's out of your control, but it's held against you just the same. Unfairly.
Now... in a situation where you're judged according to your eligible transactions... Let's say you sign up 40 people out of 80 who don't have a card. That's 50%. Even if you had 600 transactions in that week, if you've managed to have 520 of them already with a card, you should only be judged according to the number of eligible transactions... which are the 80 where a person started out without a card.
That way it can be said, relative to the number of eligible transactions, you've signed up 50%.
What's being measured is your ability to sell something to someone who doesn't have that thing already. It would be absolutely meaningless to judge your ability to sell something to someone you can't possibly sell to.
Back to the topic at hand. It would be absolutely meaningless to judge the tendency of this country to execute black people disproportionately compared to the total number of people, many of which are ineligible to be executed. You're only eligible if you're on death row. You can't execute someone who isn't on death row. The country's use of a punishment is measured by its tendency to fairly apply a punishment to someone who is eligible to receive it.
So... telling me that those executed is disproportionate to the population as a whole is like telling me 60 sign ups are inadequate in relation to my total transactions. It's meaningless. Tell me how I did in regards to eligible transactions.
How many black people are being executed relative to their population on death row?
Given a higher rate of conviction, which you so repetitively pointed out to me... and their lower rate of execution... something you've also pointed out to me... it would seem that the application of the death penalty has been far more favorable to blacks than to whites.