Poisonshady313
Well-Known Member
Because the alternative turns us into murderers ourselves.
No, it doesn't.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Because the alternative turns us into murderers ourselves.
The main thing among others that scares me about these executions is the question of their innocence.
While I believe DNA is in no doubt an indicator, I still question evidence that may get manipulated or "accidentally tampered with. There have been many cases of wrongful execution in the U.S. mostly and still is to a degree based on racism.
If a cop told me it was daytime I'd check my watch. Never trust a cop if you have any sense of self-preservation.
No, it doesn't.
And now every single on of them has to live with the fact that they killed a sentient human being. Justice huh?Just as an update. A group of police who volunteered shot him dead. Their identities are secret and one had a blank so no one has to feel guilty because you never know.
The man had no last words.
I just think people shouldn't kill other people, even if they really do deserve it. It just cheapens the value of human life.
edit: I'd take the life in prison myself. Not a big fan of non-existence. Oblivion is scary enough that even a crappy life in prison is preferable.
I disagree.
I do not feel or think that killing a known murderer is moral to begin with. I can see where people may take life as moral... self defense, defense of others etc but you are not arguing that point.
The argument is if someone kills another person and is proven beyond a reasonable doubt in the court of law as guilty then they should be put to death.
No one is about to die and there is no justification for more killing.
Vengence? Revenge? Fear?
Take the death penalty off the table and make them actually repay their debt to society if their guilty. There is no need for blood lust.
And now every single on of them has to live with the fact that they killed a sentient human being. Justice huh?
So it's wrong to kill people unless we agree to it.They can never repay their debt to society. They have stolen from it one of its law abiding members, and they can't give it back. A murderer has forfeited his rights by his violation of the social contract. He cannot be trusted to be free, and the money taken out of my paycheck should not house him, feed him, clothe him, medicate him, or protect him.
There is nothing noble or civilized about letting a murderer live. It shows a level of tolerance for his actions that I cannot tolerate. And to suggest that the same sentence for grand larceny (life imprisonment in some cases, perhaps because of multiple counts or a third strike) is sufficient for murder is simply unjust.
A neo Nazi perhaps.Wow volunteered? I wonder what kind of person it would take to actually want to volunteer in such an action.
I guess I'll have to read more about this incident.
They can never repay their debt to society. They have stolen from it one of its law abiding members, and they can't give it back. A murderer has forfeited his rights by his violation of the social contract. He cannot be trusted to be free, and the money taken out of my paycheck should not house him, feed him, clothe him, medicate him, or protect him.
There is nothing noble or civilized about letting a murderer live. It shows a level of tolerance for his actions that I cannot tolerate. And to suggest that the same sentence for grand larceny (life imprisonment in some cases, perhaps because of multiple counts or a third strike) is sufficient for murder is simply unjust.
Wow volunteered? I wonder what kind of person it would take to actually want to volunteer in such an action.
I guess I'll have to read more about this incident.
Yes, we get it, but you still fail to explain why you think so. Why the teary-eyed appeals to emotion regarding the lives and well being of those who've preyed upon and did irrepairable damage to innocent people?i think the death sentence kind of denegrates the society that uses it
i disregard the killer completely in my argument and deal with the fact that in 2010 a free and democratic country that puts men on the moon splits the attom etc, etc ,still kills its criminals by firing squad its just wierd
Actually you dont get it at all i couldnt give a monkeys about the miscreants let them go to prison for the rest of their lives. I Think it damages society when that society thinks killing someone is right for killing someone.