• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Vatican Blasts Trans Surgery, Surogacy, Etc

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Jesus might not have been about sex. The history of Christianity would suggest there is most definitely a pre-occupation with sex in Christianity.
Of course.
Saint Paul and Saint Augustine played a role in all that.

But let's face the truth... the saeculum obscurum, that is the X century AD has been defined the century of pornocracy in the Vatican...
not to mention that nowadays...these are the articles we read on RomaToday:
Orgies, parties, dark rooms: the nights of Roman gay priests.
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
No.

Yes.

Yes.


Do you think that only the infliction of concrete physical injuries qualify as torture?
I use the standard understanding of torture:
tor·ture
/ˈtôrCHər/
noun
the action or practice of inflicting severe pain or suffering on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something.

If you are making up some other definition of torture, then it is impossible for us to talk, sense that would not be English.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Of course.
Saint Paul and Saint Augustine played a role in all that.

But let's face the truth... the saeculum obscurum, that is the X century AD has been defined the century of pornocracy in the Vatican...
not to mention that nowadays...these are the articles we read on RomaToday:
Orgies, parties, dark rooms: the nights of Roman gay priests.
It's ever been thus. Alexander VI, for example. That has never stopped the church trying to control sex.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
That is just your religious and politically based opinion. As opposed to the consensus of all the relevant disciplined of medical professionals.

I have never professionally studied the making of a city's electrical grid. I have the right to have an opinion, but one would have to be an idiot to take my opinion on how best to go about supplying electricity to a city over that of a consensus civil or electrical engineer. I would have to be an idiot to take my opinion on how best to go about supplying electricity to a city over that of a consensus civil or electrical engineer.

Your opinion on issues of physical and psychological medicines appears to be just as ill founded and unlearned as my opinion on the placement of substations.

The state of your claimed consensus is not what you say and probably never was.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Surgery doesn't change a person's identity according to my understanding, it only changes their sex organs to match their identity.

And more tragedies have occurred due to not undergoing reassignment surgery, so if your goal is to minimise tragedy then reassignment surgery is good news.

Surgery and hormones are cosmetic treatments and the people who have them do not receive organs that match what they identify as, even if they may appear more male or female.
I don't think it can be said that any tragedies in people who have not undergone reassignment surgery are due to their not having that surgery.
It would be due to the way they feel about themselves and care of these people in that area, how they manage the way they feel about themselves, is now being seen in more European countries as the best first approach instead of advocating hormone blockers and/or surgery, especially for minors.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
Are you certain about that last point? Can you point to anything that affirms it? I saw one study, but it was considered flawed due to lack of any followup.

I'm not sure how a study can be seen as flawed dut to lack of follow up. Certainly a future follow up would add to the study however.
Some pubescent people are confused about whether they are male or female, or think that they are not the gender that their biology suggests and if left to their own devices most of them become unconfused and realise that they actually are what their biology tells them. Some of that group just end up seeing that they are homosexual.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
Says who?
I find it odd that people come into these discussions having read none of the sources.

This is not tried and tested medicine, it's still very young.

Here is the conclusion from a study:

There is a need for continued research on suicidality outcomes following gender-affirming treatment. Future research that incorporates multiple measures of suicidality and adequately controls for the presence of psychiatric comorbidity, substance use, and other suicide risk-enhancing factors is needed to strengthen the validity and increase the robustness of the results. There may be implications for the informed consent process of gender-affirming treatment given the current lack of methodological robustness of the literature reviewed.

 
Last edited:

ppp

Well-Known Member
That is just your religious and politically based opinion. As opposed to the consensus of all the relevant disciplined of medical professionals

The state of your claimed consensus is not what you say and probably never was.

You are attempting to cite the news coverage of the political and religious movement of which you are a member. You seem to be allergic to primary scientific literature. Do you even know what primary scientific literature is?
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
I use the standard understanding of torture:
tor·ture
/ˈtôrCHər/
noun
the action or practice of inflicting severe pain or suffering on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something.

If you are making up some other definition of torture, then it is impossible for us to talk, sense that would not be English.
I asked, Do you think that only the infliction of concrete physical injuries qualify as torture? Since you cannot or will not answer, I will. Both the infliction of physical and emotional pain qualify as torture. One does not have to hit one's spouse or one's children in order to abuse them.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
You are attempting to cite the news coverage of the political and religious movement of which you are a member. You seem to be allergic to primary scientific literature. Do you even know what primary scientific literature is?

No.
 
Top