Vatican City rejects French Gay Amb

[Servant_of_the_One1]

It's very simple and wrong to think homosexuals are all or only about sodomy.


I have no judgment since there isn't any information.

Iam heterosexual, and it is no secret that i want wife for love. Wouldnt u be shocked if i told u i marry woman and i wont have sex with her???

I gues homosexuals think the same, they want marriage and they want sodomy within that marriage.
That is what the church doesnt want, they believe in marriage between man and woman , and natural sex intercourse(within marriage).

So iam not surprised that they are suspicious of the gay amb.

 

[leibowde84]

Iam heterosexual, and it is no secret that i want wife for love. Wouldnt u be shocked if i told u i marry woman and i wont have sex with her???

I gues homosexuals think the same, they want marriage and they want sodomy within that marriage.
That is what the church doesnt want, they believe in marriage between man and woman , and natural sex intercourse(within marriage).

So iam not surprised that they are suspicious of the gay amb.

Sexual orientation (a.k.a. wanting a marriage with sodomy involved) is not a sin. I'm sure that even the Pope has impure thoughts from time to time, so it is pretty hypocritical to just assume that homosexuals wouldn't be able to abstain.

 

[Jainarayan]

Iam heterosexual, and it is no secret that i want wife for love. Wouldnt u be shocked if i told u i marry woman and i wont have sex with her???

I gues homosexuals think the same, they want marriage and they want sodomy within that marriage.
That is what the church doesnt want, they believe in marriage between man and woman , and natural sex intercourse(within marriage).

So iam not surprised that they are suspicious of the gay amb.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Sexual orientation (a.k.a. wanting a marriage with sodomy involved) is not a sin. I'm sure that even the Pope has impure thoughts from time to time, so it is pretty hypocritical to just assume that homosexuals wouldn't be able to abstain.

Lol! Impure thoughs and going against the bible are two difterent things sir.



What is the point of following the bible when you can marry same sex, commit sodomy?

 

[Jumi]

Iam heterosexual, and it is no secret that i want wife for love. Wouldnt u be shocked if i told u i marry woman and i wont have sex with her???

I too am heterosexual, although not that interested in sex.

I gues homosexuals think the same, they want marriage and they want sodomy within that marriage.

Many heterosexuals want sodomy, not all homosexuals do.

That is what the church doesnt want, they believe in marriage between man and woman , and natural sex intercourse(within marriage).

Yes, their idea of marriage is between one man and one woman. No polygamy.

So iam not surprised that they are suspicious of the gay amb.

Their priests are supposed to be celibate. I'm suspicious of that claim.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

I too am heterosexual, although not that interested in sex.


Many heterosexuals want sodomy, not all homosexuals do.


Yes, their idea of marriage is between one man and one woman. No polygamy.


Their priests are supposed to be celibate. I'm suspicious of that claim.

Iam not saying sodomy is allowed for heterosexuals. It is still sin.

But homosexuals commit two sins according to bible: 1) sodomy , 2) marrying same sex or doing sodomy with same sex.

 

[Jumi]

But homosexuals commit two sins according to bible: 1) sodomy , 2) marrying same sex or doing sodomy with same sex.

You're talking but you're not listening. How hard is it to understand that not all homosexuals are even interested in "sodomy"?

 

[leibowde84]

Lol! Impure thoughs and going against the bible are two difterent things sir.



What is the point of following the bible when you can marry same sex, commit sodomy?

My feeling is that Paul was not really an authority on the subject and was more after a power-grab than anything else, getting in on Christianity on the ground-floor. I don't think that part of the Bible is interpreted correctly. There is nothing in the Bible forbidding same-sex marriage explicitly. That is merely read into it by the various members of the Church throughout history.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

You're talking but you're not listening. How hard is it to understand that not all homosexuals are even interested in "sodomy"?

So whats the point of being homosexuals?

Just holding hands? Oops, not allowed according to the bible.

 

[leibowde84]

Iam not saying sodomy is allowed for heterosexuals. It is still sin.

But homosexuals commit two sins according to bible: 1) sodomy , 2) marrying same sex or doing sodomy with same sex.

You do realize that there are many homosexuals who remain virgins their entire lives, just as with heterosexuals, right?

 

[Monk Of Reason]

So whats the point of being homosexuals?

Just holding hands? Oops, not allowed according to the bible.

There is no "point" in being a homosexual. They are simply born that way. And as a Christian one should not discriminate against homosexuals. It is un-christian.

 

[leibowde84]

So whats the point of being homosexuals?

Just holding hands? Oops, not allowed according to the bible.

"the point of homosexuality" ... lol. You are obviously missing something. It is a sexual orientation, or, in other words, who a person is attracted to. There is no "point". It just is what it is.

 

[Jumi]

So whats the point of being homosexuals?

Dunno, what's the point of being heterosexual and falling in love?

Just holding hands? Oops, not allowed according to the bible.

Men holding hands is forbidden in your Bible? That's news to me, what version is it?

 

[Jainarayan]

So whats the point of being homosexuals?

Just holding hands? Oops, not allowed according to the bible.

Being in love with someone and wanting to build a life with them.

 

[Wirey]

Being in love with someone and wanting to build a life with them.

Nonsense! Everyone knows that all two gay men are interested in is stretching out each other's cinnamon rings. Just like every heterosexual couple exists only to attend church and teach important values to their children. You know, like how Alexander the Great was gay and accomplished nothing, whereas heterosexual Adolph Hitler improved all mankind. Grow up and be reasonable, and choose to be sexually aroused by vaginas and their apparent resemblance to a toothless Willie Nelson.

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

"the point of homosexuality" ... lol. You are obviously missing something. It is a sexual orientation, or, in other words, who a person is attracted to. There is no "point". It just is what it is.

Ok, then what is the point of having those feelings as ''christian believer" when you cannot marry same sex and you cannot have sexual inercourse with your husband.

Leibowde, you are extremely liberal christian, i think bible means nothing to you just fairytales from the ancient.


Good for homosexuals who stays away from sodomy and marriage with samesex. I was talking about gays/lesbians that marry with same sex and do unnatural sex(according to bible).

 

[columbus]

="Servant_of_the_One1, post: 4244948, member: 56651"]So iam not surprised that they are suspicious of the gay amb.

Suppose the French government selected an ambassador who is Muslim? That is also against the Bible.
Such an ambassador might be top notch at the job. The task has nothing to do with religion. Nothing to do with sex either. It is a political job, with clearly defined parameters.
Why would it be wrong to reject a Muslim, but not a gay?
Unless maybe you think Muslims are unable to do it?
Tom

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Suppose the French government selected an ambassador who is Muslim? That is also against the Bible.
Such an ambassador might be top notch at the job. The task has nothing to do with religion. Nothing to do with sex either. It is a political job, with clearly defined parameters.
Why would it be wrong to reject a Muslim, but not a gay?
Unless maybe you think Muslims are unable to do it?
Tom

I would accept if vaticancity opposed muslim amb. It is their right.

Why cant homosexuals and pro-gay camp accept what vatican city wants ?

 

[Wirey]

Ok, then what is the point of having those feelings as ''christian believer" when you cannot marry same sex and you cannot have sexual inercourse with your husband.

Leibowde, you are extremely liberal christian, i think bible means nothing to you just fairytales from the ancient.


Good for homosexuals who stays away from sodomy and marriage with samesex. I was talking about gays/lesbians that marry with same sex and do unnatural sex(according to bible).

So an organization that protects pedophiles by hiding behind some Devine right was correct in barring someone who participates in a consensual sexual encounter with a reasonable adult? Is that seriously your point?

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

So an organization that protects pedophiles by hiding behind some Devine right was correct in barring someone who participates in a consensual sexual encounter with a reasonable adult? Is that seriously your point?

I have no comment on the matter. Just highlighting why Vaticancity would oppose gay.