Waltz family members are supporting Trump.

[SkepticThinker]

Well that's what appeals are for and the saga continues. Anything else you want to add?

No need. You've demonstrated my point quite nicely for me.

 

[We Never Know]

There have been numerous threads on the subject.

Well good. Link one.
Or better yet since you said "the evidence" you must know what it is so why can't you just state it?

 

[Twilight Hue]

Victim blamer.

Well if winning over 83 million without any real evidence still makes one a victim , I'd be complimenting her on becoming a non-victim in the end for her fabulous new found opulence swimming deep in immense wealth and luxury.

 

[Twilight Hue]

No need. You've demonstrated my point quite nicely for me.

Glad to be of service.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Well good. Link one.
Or better yet since you said "the evidence" you must know what it is so why can't you just state it?

I'm sure you can easily find one yourself.
I don't take orders.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Well if winning over 83 million without any real evidence still makes one a victim , I'd be complimenting her on becoming a non-victim in the end for her fabulous new found opulence swimming deep in immense wealth and luxury.

So being awarded a lot of money by a judge and jury means a person is not a victim. It means no crime was committed against you.

Got it.

You're really batting a thousand here.

 

[We Never Know]

Well if winning over 83 million without any real evidence still makes one a victim , I'd be complimenting her on becoming a non-victim in the end for her fabulous new found opulence swimming deep in immense wealth and luxury.

I wonder how many would completely accept the evidence if it had been their brother charged for sexual assault from 28 years ago.

 

[We Never Know]

I'm sure you can easily find one yourself.
I don't take orders.

You can't even say what it was?
Must be bogus hearsay then. Thanks.

 

[Twilight Hue]

I wonder how many would completely accept the evidence if it had been their brother charged for sexual assault from 28 years ago.

Yeah well provided there was actually evidence to begin with, and truth be told it should have been addressed 28 years ago proper and not 28 years after.

 

[Twilight Hue]

I'm sure you can easily find one yourself.
I don't take orders.

Understandable from people who like to make conclusions out of personal assumptions.

 

[We Never Know]

Yeah well provided there was actually evidence to begin with, and truth be told it should have been addressed 28 years ago proper and not 28 years after.

Some people don't report it.
Some people wait until someone becomes president to report it.

But all in all IMO its... Its fits him, he's an *******, he's the orange man, he's a male chauvinist, he's grabs women by the *****, etc etc most of all I dont like him so it must be true.

 

[F1fan]

There certainly is a jackpot involved and we all saw it being eagerly awarded.

Two juries awarded the penalties.

How do you know Trump wasn't wrongfully found liable?
Truth is you don't.

Two juries made judgments based on the evidence. It has nothing to do with me.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Some people don't report it.
Some people wait until someone becomes president to report it.

But all in all IMO its... Its fits him, he's an *******, he's the orange man, he's a male chauvinist, he's grabs women by the *****, etc etc most of all I dont like him so it must be true.

Yeah there's also a protection of the statute of limitations for that reason as it gives ample time for a person to get enough over their stress and report it. But truth be told everybody with a half a brain should realize the earlier the better, and people should be encouraged to report crimes right away instead of years if not decades later.

 

[We Never Know]

Two juries made judgments based on the evidence. It has nothing to do with me.

You all keep saying the court/jury used the evidence so what was the actual evidence?

 

[Twilight Hue]

Two juries awarded the penalties.


Two juries made judgments based on the evidence. It has nothing to do with me.

Like I said in past postings that people like to forget, it's always never over until the fat lady sings, and once she sings It's to the Caribbean.

 

[Twilight Hue]

You all keep saying they court/jury used the evidence so what was the actual evidence?

I'm absolutely dying to know myself what that 'evidence' is that they will never present to anyone but themselves and they aren't talking either.

Fishy I say.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

The woman can't even remember dates names and places for God's sake. All she did was win the money lottery to which she did wonderfully well in doing so, I'm sure the money shut her up well as she can live a life of opulent luxury, and never have to work or do anything ever again.

What a score.

Disgusting.

 

[SkepticThinker]

You can't even say what it was?
Must be bogus hearsay then. Thanks.

Not my job. Especially when there have already been many multiple threads on the subject.

And like I said, I don't take orders. You're perfectly capable of re-educating yourself on the matter.

 

[We Never Know]

Not my job. Especially when there have already been many multiple threads on the subject.

And like I said, I don't take orders. You're perfectly capable of re-educating yourself on the matter.

Must be bogus hearsay then. Thanks.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Oh. I put you in a spot didn't I.

So again...

You don't want to call them people's reproductive rights because its will dilute women's reproductive rights but the left can dilute pregnant women/girls to pregnant people and that's ok.

Btw, a transman isn't a woman right?
So do they have
1. women's reproductive rights?
2. people's reproductive rights?

If you pick 1 then you are referring to transgender men as women.
If you pick 2 you are diluting women's rights.

Women's reproductive rights aren't exclusive to women any more because there are trans men who aren't women.

People's reproductive rights will include trans men that aren't women/girls.

Its a pickle isn't it but its what you all created.

While we can see clearly that protecting the rights of minorities is anathema to you, you are making a great big fuss about very, very little. You appear to know very little about trans-people, who can have undergone a lot of medical treatment, or none at all.

Any person who can get pregnant should have the same rights as any other person who can get pregnant. And the same for people who have cancer. And since the cancer can be removed, or treated chemically to kill it, while the fetus is non-viable, there is no real reason to treat it differently than a cancer, which is also a "life" made of human cells run amok.

And no, "you all" didn't "create" any of this. "We all" are merely trying to recognize -- as cultures much less developed than ours have recognized since the beginning of recorded history -- that some people are just born differently than others. Wow, who knew, eh?

Cultures That Recognize More than Two Genders | Britannica

Curious about genders that defy the binary? Learn more about cultures around the world that recognize nonbinary identities.

www.britannica.com