Argentbear
Well-Known Member
If you were really interested you could just look it up, the proceedings are a matter of public record after all.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Waltz family members are supporting Trump.
- Thread starter Twilight Hue
- Start date
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Yep you got me! It's totaly bogus.
This has been discussed ad nauseum on these boards and I'm pretty sure you've participated in those discussions before.
I"m not re-hashing the whole thing here for you all over again becuase you can't be bothered to look it up yourself.
We Never Know
No Slack
Then its simple. Drop 'women's reproductive rights' and call it 'people's reproductive rights'.While we can see clearly that protecting the rights of minorities is anathema to you, you are making a great big fuss about very, very little. You appear to know very little about trans-people, who can have undergone a lot of medical treatment, or none at all.
Any person who can get pregnant should have the same rights at any other person who can get pregnant. And the same for people who have cancer. And since the cancer can be removed, or treated chemically to kill it, while the fetus is non-viable, there is no real reason to treat it differently than a cancer, which is also a "life" made of human cells run amok.
And no, "you all" didn't "create" any of this. "We all" are merely trying to recognize -- as cultures much less developed than ours have recognized since the beginning of recorded history -- that some people are just born differently than others. Wow, who knew, eh?
Cultures That Recognize More than Two Genders | Britannica
Curious about genders that defy the binary? Learn more about cultures around the world that recognize nonbinary identities.www.britannica.com
I had a three-level lumbar laminectomy on my spine a number of years ago, and although it was less than 20 years ago, I can't remember the year or the date that I had it. And trust me, it was a very big deal in my life.
My partner, more recently, spent 8 1/2 months in hospital from a particulary nasty type of Guillaine-Barre Syndrome, and will never recover a lot of his former function. Also a very, very big deal. Neither of us remember the dates involved.
Do you remember the precise date of every single event in your life, even the important ones? Honestly? Every one?
We Never Know
No Slack
Without evidence to support the evidence you claim I can call it hearsay, lies, made up, etc.Yep you got me! It's totaly bogus.
This has been discussed ad nauseum on these boards and I'm pretty sure you've participated in those discussions before.
I"m not re-hashing the whole thing here for you all over again becuase you can't be bothered to look it up yourself.
Again, Thanks.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Go ahead. A judge and two juries who saw the evidence disagree with you.
But you do you, boo. We all know court cases come down to the opinion of some dude on the internet.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
There you go. Just read it and explain where it went wrong.
Soandso
ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
Really good point. I can't remember the date I mangled my arm either, and that changed the course of my life for sure...
We Never Know
No Slack
Yep all she said she said, two women saying me too and a picture of Trump and Carroll from 1987, 10 years prior in to the alleged assault.
Pretty much what I figured.
Would you accept that as good evidence if it were against your brother?
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Well, you weren't on the jury, so what you think is irrelevant.
Look it up if you’re interested.
There’s no chance Trump isn’t liable. He’s a criminal who doesn’t like being held accountable.
We Never Know
No Slack
So to you anyone convicted of any crime in court/by a jury are 100% guilty/liable. Even though the evidence is she said she said, two others saying me too and an old photograph. Got it.Go ahead. A judge and two juries who saw the evidence disagree with you.
But you do you, boo. We all know court cases come down to the opinion of some dude on the internet.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
So you read through the link I gave you.
We Never Know
No Slack
Oh it was by a jury so it has to be right. Juries are never wrong
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Oh it was by a jury so it has to be right. Juries are never wrong
So you didn't read through it. So what you say might be true or not. Well, if that is all you got, I still stand by the jury's finding.
Now if you actually have read the case and could point out the actual problems, that would be different.
We Never Know
No Slack
Scanned through it
Saw two people claim she said this
Saw two others claim he did it to me too
Saw an old picture that was taken 10 years prior to the alleged assault
Oh also saw the jury didn't believe she was raped.
Saw enough to know there was really no physical evidence. It was all circumstantial of she said she said.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Okay. Have much do I owe you for your lawyer time spent on that and can I get please get your lawyer credentials?
We Never Know
No Slack
Facts are facts.
mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
Well, no, not really as it depends on the laws to interpret their evidentiary value.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Yep. And the fact is that Trump has been found civilly liable for sexual assault and defamation by a judge and two juries.
Those are the facts, regardless of anyone's opinions.