Father Heathen
Veteran Member
But anyway, as an atheist, do you think there would be a place for you under MAGA's theocracy?Yea. We know the rhetoric like an old tape recorder.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But anyway, as an atheist, do you think there would be a place for you under MAGA's theocracy?Yea. We know the rhetoric like an old tape recorder.
So if Marchan puts him in jail for the 34 felonies that he has duly been convicted of waiting only for the actual sentencing, that will suddenly change your understanding of who he is?And Trump is not in jail. Don't forget that.
So if Marchan puts him in jail for the 34 felonies that he has duly been convicted of waiting only for the actual sentencing, that will suddenly change your understanding of who he is?And Trump is not in jail. Don't forget that.
That’s sounds anti-Constitution - Popular vote means that if enough people want slavery, you got it!What that means is that you don’t use reputable media.
I am an advocate for reproductive freedom for women . I want voting to be easier for all citizens. I want representative districts of every state to be drawn by AI that is instructed to be fair. I want the president to be decided by popular vote. I want the wealthy to pay more in taxes mainly by eliminating loopholes. I want there to be universal healthcare with prestige access for the rich. I want critical thinking skills taught in all schools as a requirement. I want higher science standards for public schools. I want a national sport and fitness program for all kids, mostly for the poor.
I can go on. I don’t have a label to define myself.
A bachelors degree which is barely the entry level to becoming an economist and at that he has demonstrated his education by declaring bankruptcy 6 times not counting the businesses that were closed for fraud. As to his latest venture, it has lost 75% of its value since he brought into existence and has revenues of about 3.5 million per year versus expenditures of about 40 million.Trump has an economics degree and your clairvoyance into what people are thinking is quite impressive, and maybe you should go on George Noory and demonstrate your obviously spectacular gift of clairvoyance to the world.
Which is why we have a constitution and a government of laws, but yes that is democracy and it is also possible in a republic, it has absolutely nothing to do with Marxism, We only don't have slavery because there was a popular vote against it seconded by the Republican consent of the government. IE the states agreed by popular vote and the Congress agreed by 2/3 majority to amend the constitution.That’s sounds anti-Constitution - Popular vote means that if enough people want slavery, you got it!
That being said, I love critical thinking position and higher science
You're the one who actually needs Civic classes. Why don't you go take a look, educate yourself, and find the fact that slavery still exists in this country......
You really need to go back and get a basic civics, US government, education. This was all taught in junior and senior high school to public school kids.
Oh, I just realized this all happened while Marx was alive, maybe he is the reason we don't have slavery?
Should we bring it back because he was against it?
Well the Republicans do act a little bit more like blue dogs and the Democrats obviously are going toward the Marxist communist end of the spectrum at full steam. I suppose you could call the Democrats the new Reds with the addition of the hammer and sickle.This says a lot about Waltz.
And this says a lot about the direction of the Party in general:
Ex-Democratic 2020 Candidate Tulsi Gabbard Endorses Trump
Former Democratic lawmaker Tulsi Gabbard backed Donald Trump.www.forbes.com
I believe that The Republican party will be the new Democratic Party.
Oh, please! @Pogo meant -- as any rational person could see -- that there is no longer LEGAL slavery. And that is an immense contrast to the country's past, when you did have exactly that.You're the one who actually needs Civic classes. Why don't you go take a look, educate yourself, and find the fact that slavery still exists in this country.
I doubt being from Canada, you're not even aware that slavery is still legal in this country.Oh, please! @Pogo meant -- as any rational person could see -- that there is no longer LEGAL slavery. And that is an immense contrast to the country's past, when you did have exactly that.
The slavery that exists now is illegal, wrong, against the law -- do you get that? So are lots of other things -- hell, school shootings exist in your country (sorry, not "exist" but "abound"), but I'm sure you are aware that they are against the law.
It's a little quirk of human social existence that being "against the law" does not mean "doesn't exist." Sometimes, the best that can be done is to punish them, when they are found out.
Oh, thank you, great Sage!I doubt being from Canada, you're not even aware that slavery is still legal in this country.
I would suggest correcting that clear ignorance of yours and I'll even help you.
It's called the exception clause in the 13th Amendment. I would suggest reading it and educating yourself on the matter.
Your welcome.
And it's the right that's a "so what".Trump's family member goes against him. To the left that's a big deal.
And to the right that's a big deal.Walz's family member goes against him. To the left that's a so what.
And to the right that's a "so what".Some republicans support Harris. To the left that's a big deal.
And to the right that's a big deal.Some democrats support Trump. To the left that's a so what.
"Your" is possessive, whereas "you're" is a contraction of "you are".Your welcome.
Get back to me when you have something worth addressing.Which is why we have a constitution and a government of laws, but yes that is democracy and it is also possible in a republic, it has absolutely nothing to do with Marxism, We only don't have slavery because there was a popular vote against it seconded by the Republican consent of the government. IE the states agreed by popular vote and the Congress agreed by 2/3 majority to amend the constitution.
You really need to go back and get a basic civics, US government, education. This was all taught in junior and senior high school to public school kids.
Oh, I just realized this all happened while Marx was alive, maybe he is the reason we don't have slavery?
Should we bring it back because he was against it?
Democrats obviously are going toward the Marxist communist end of the spectrum at full steam.
The constitution can be changed. Didn't you take a civics class?That’s sounds anti-Constitution -
Sorry, no. There are civil rights. You Christian conservatives might want slavery back, but ALL humans have rights, including migrants. Interesting you bring up wanting slavery as it is condoned by your God. DDo you oppose slavery even though your God condones it? Or do you think slavery is OK?Popular vote means that if enough people want slavery, you got it!
When? Do you accept evolution? Climate change being contributed by human behavior?That being said, I love critical thinking position and higher science
That photo of people wearing 'Nebraska Walz's for Trump' shirts? They're distant cousins
A sister of Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz says she doesn’t recognize the people wearing “Nebraska Walz’s for Trump” T-shirts in a photo that is making the rounds on social media.apnews.com
Shows not all of them are drinking the Kool aid. They know the country is in dire straits.
And it's the right that's a "so what".
And to the right that's a big deal.
And to the right that's a "so what".
And to the right that's a big deal.
A bipartisan congressional commission is called for with hearings on each addition for veracity.I think someone should assemble a chart--could be any kind: pie, bar, matrix, whatever--and four names at the top: Trump, Vance, Harris, Walz. Then collect data on which have relatives who oppose or plan to vote against them weighted by how distantly related they are. We could start building the chart with the material in the OP, but we certainly have some Trump family members--e.g. his niece, Mary L Trump, and nephew, Fred Trump III. I don't know about Vance's or Harris's family, but I can see that this kind of thing is all very important to people. So it would help to have some way to keep score.