Good grief.
I'm talking about you answering a question I asked you like 3 pages ago.
"So, to ask again, for a third time, what do you think this says about Tim Walz, exactly? You said it said something about him."
#84
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Good grief.
I'm talking about you answering a question I asked you like 3 pages ago.
"So, to ask again, for a third time, what do you think this says about Tim Walz, exactly? You said it said something about him."
This is probably going to come as a shock to you, but Trump has bellowed his own lunacy loud and clear for the whole world to see and hear ever since coming down his stupid golden escalator. Yes, he did say bleach, and yes he did say UV light and various other nonsensensical things about COVID-19. Right there in the WH Press Room. Yes, he did wander off into whether dying by sharks or electrocution is better, at his own rally.Wish Democrats actually had actual recordings and videos of Trump rather than hearing things like, "This person heard that through another person who heard that , and this guy says he saw Trump do this and say that ..and it must be true"..blah blah blah.
Good grief.
I'm talking about you answering a question I asked you like 3 pages ago.
"So, to ask again, for a third time, what do you think this says about Tim Walz, exactly? You said it said something about him."
Heck, look at the Kennedy's How many near relations got together and said sorry, please don't blame us. This is a Republican talking point? Wow.So TF what? Is Tim Walz obliged to run on a platform of "I'll do whatever my brother says?" Then let the bloody brother run!
And for the record, because his brother disagrees with him doesn't make his brother right and Tim wrong. This is usually not a hard thing for most people to understand.
They learned from Rosemary Woods.Tape recorders have a habit of accurately recording what they hear. Wish MAGAs could do that.
What that means is that you don’t use reputable media.You have yet to give the sources for your inflammatory and gaslighting statements.
I am an advocate for reproductive freedom for women . I want voting to be easier for all citizens. I want representative districts of every state to be drawn by AI that is instructed to be fair. I want the president to be decided by popular vote. I want the wealthy to pay more in taxes mainly by eliminating loopholes. I want there to be universal healthcare with prestige access for the rich. I want critical thinking skills taught in all schools as a requirement. I want higher science standards for public schools. I want a national sport and fitness program for all kids, mostly for the poor.So what are you?
Of course there's the other side, where one just likes to blow completely out of proportion all one he or she hears and sees.This is probably going to come as a shock to you, but Trump has bellowed his own lunacy loud and clear for the whole world to see and hear ever since coming down his stupid golden escalator. Yes, he did say bleach, and yes he did say UV light and various other nonsensensical things about COVID-19. Right there in the WH Press Room. Yes, he did wander off into whether dying by sharks or electrocution is better, at his own rally.
But why bother? There's so much -- way too much to even begin trying to catalogue it all here. But of course, either you would never hear such things, or you would repress memory of them if you did.
He was not convicted of sexual assault. He was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil court. He was found liable by the testimony of one person who couldn't remember when it happened and has accused many other people in the past. We don't believe she is credible.And we know that you guys ignore Trump's sexual assault and felony convictions every single time they're brought up.
It's more telling than you seem to know. And extremely off-putting and alarming.
He was not convicted of sexual assault. He was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil court. He was found liable by the testimony of one person who couldn't remember when it happened and has accused many other people in the past. We don't believe she is credible.
You mean the one(s) where the statute of limitations had expired for a misdemeanor so the charges were contorted to make them a felony so Trump could be charged?His felony conviction was for a business related matter that no one has ever been charged with in the way he was. So yeah, we don't care about that felony conviction.
Funny how you never provide an example -- just the accusations. Sorry, it's not actually funny -- it's tiresome.Of course there's the other side, where one just likes to blow completely out of proportion all one he or she hears and sees.
It can be quite entertaining to say at the least.
Oh okay!
Well, nevermind then!
What a great point!
\sarcasm
Pretty sure he's being sentenced next week sometime.
You go on supporting a dude who's been found civilly liable for sexual abuse. Good plan!
I don't care if it tires you or not.Funny how you never provide an example -- just the accusations. Sorry, it's not actually funny -- it's tiresome.
So, do you plan to overturn the legal system? Because, you see, it doesn't matter in the least who you consider "credible." It matters what 12 jurors who are presented with all the evidence court find credible.He was not convicted of sexual assault. He was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil court. He was found liable by the testimony of one person who couldn't remember when it happened and has accused many other people in the past. We don't believe she is credible.
And once again, what does it matter that no has ever been charged that way before? What matters is what the law says, and how the jury finds when presented with evidence that someone has broken the law.His felony conviction was for a business related matter that no one has ever been charged with in the way he was. So yeah, we don't care about that felony conviction.
And yet, when 16 eminent economists get together and agree that Trump's economic policies will hurt the nation, and when Goldman Sachs says that a Democratic sweep would give the country a boost --- you ignore it all because, of course, you are all-wise and all-knowing. No, you want Trump and you'll invent any fable to explain why.I don't give a rat's *** about Trump's personal life as I'm only interested in the man's policy making that can help this country and that's what actually counts.
Trump has an economics degree and your clairvoyance into what people are thinking is quite impressive, and maybe you should go on George Noory and demonstrate your obviously spectacular gift of clairvoyance to the world.And yet, when 16 eminent economists get together and agree that Trump's economic policies will hurt the nation, and when Goldman Sachs says that a Democratic sweep would give the country a boost --- you ignore it all because, of course, you are all-wise and all-knowing. No, you want Trump and you'll invent any fable to explain why.
Rational in the sense of the Enlightenment that started several hundred years ago and was the inspiration for the founding fathers sounds reasonable.What that means is that you don’t use reputable media.
I am an advocate for reproductive freedom for women . I want voting to be easier for all citizens. I want representative districts of every state to be drawn by AI that is instructed to be fair. I want the president to be decided by popular vote. I want the wealthy to pay more in taxes mainly by eliminating loopholes. I want there to be universal healthcare with prestige access for the rich. I want critical thinking skills taught in all schools as a requirement. I want higher science standards for public schools. I want a national sport and fitness program for all kids, mostly for the poor.
I can go on. I don’t have a label to define myself.
At a 100 to 1 or more irrational, this is your chance to post some of Trumps actual statements that are rational proposals, not just complaints or statements that HE will make it better.Of course there's the other side, where one just likes to blow completely out of proportion all one he or she hears and sees.
It can be quite entertaining to say at the least.
So in other words you don't know. I didn't think you did, so why are we tossing such terms around, then?must I do everything for you? Ever tried using the computer?
If he has an economics degree, he forgot what he was taught. Tarriffs are not taxes on other countries, they are taxes paid by Americans, just for example. Trump did say that tarriffs are "paid for mostly by China, by the way, not by us." And he forgets that other countries can as easily apply tarriffs to American goods in retaliation -- and have done so.Trump has an economics degree and your clairvoyance into what people are thinking is quite impressive, and maybe you should go on George Noory and demonstrate your obviously spectacular gift of clairvoyance to the world.
Like losing one's **** over plastic bags. That is entertaining.Of course there's the other side, where one just likes to blow completely out of proportion all one he or she hears and sees.
It can be quite entertaining to say at the least.