• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Was Muhammad a good man?

What is your opinion on Muhammad?

  • He was a great man and those who insult him must be punished!

    Votes: 60 27.9%
  • He was a great man, but people are free to insult him

    Votes: 47 21.9%
  • He was not a good man, but we should respect him because I believe in respecting other religions

    Votes: 23 10.7%
  • He was a terrible man and we should condemn his awful actions!

    Votes: 85 39.5%

  • Total voters
    215

Satnaam

Conquer your mind
Sikhi rejects circumcision, Hajj and Ramadan. What are you talking about? Prove your point.

Islam borrows from Judaism, Christianity and Paganism. Islam stole concepts from the other two religions and Pagans. Muhammad, in an attempt to please Pagans, uttered the Satanic verses. What kind of prophet wouldn't know the difference between an angel and Satan? How can you be sure other parts of the Quran were not delivered by the Satan too?

Muhammad was a lustful person, a pedophile and mass murderer. A person who has no control over his lust and anger can not claim to be a prophet.
 
Last edited:

1robin

Christian/Baptist
Sikhi rejects circumcision, Hajj and Ramadan. What are you talking about? Prove your point.

Islam borrows from Judaism, Christianity and Paganism. Islam stole concepts from the other two religions and Pagans. Muhammad, in an attempt to please Pagans, uttered the Satanic verses. What kind of prophet wouldn't know the difference between an angel and Satan? How can you be sure other parts of the Quran were not delivered by the Satan too?

Muhammad was a lustful person, a pedophile and mass murderer. A person who has no control over his lust and anger can not claim to be a prophet.
Oh they can claim it. They just can't demonstrate it. What is far more remarkable is that anyone would believe it. However with enforced compliance, being a Muslim at birth, and strict control of media I guess anything can be propagated including splitting the moon in two (even though not one record of that massive event is recorded by any astrologer of the time and there were many).
 

arthra

Baha'i
The Hour has come near, and the moon has split [in two]. And if they see a miracle, they turn away and say, "Passing magic."

- Quran 54:1-2

The Last Hour draws near and the moon is split asunder. (1) Yet, when they see a sign they [who deny the truth] turn their backs and say, "The same old sorcery!" (2) They deny the truth and follow their own whims, every matter has its appointed time, (3) there has come to them many a tiding wherein there are warnings,



I've seen "even if" they see the splitting of the moon they will not believe..

The splitting of the moon can have meanings that are symbolic:

"The heaven of religions is split and the moon cleft asunder and the peoples of the earth are brought together in a new resurrection."

(Baha'u'llah, Tablets of Baha'u'llah, p. 247)
 

Satnaam

Conquer your mind
Arthra, read the life of Muhammad and his actions. then come back and see if you still respect Islam or Muhammad.

Whats symbolic in marrying a 9 year old doll playing girl when he himself was 54? Disgusting act of Muhammad.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Arthra, read the life of Muhammad and his actions. then come back and see if you still respect Islam or Muhammad.
Respect for Islam and their prophet, Muhammad, is an ingrained part of Baha'i belief. If it was otherwise, we would never have heard of the Baha'i faith because followers of Islam would have eradicated all traces of the Baha'i's founders.
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
The Hour has come near, and the moon has split [in two]. And if they see a miracle, they turn away and say, "Passing magic."

- Quran 54:1-2

The Last Hour draws near and the moon is split asunder. (1) Yet, when they see a sign they [who deny the truth] turn their backs and say, "The same old sorcery!" (2) They deny the truth and follow their own whims, every matter has its appointed time, (3) there has come to them many a tiding wherein there are warnings,



I've seen "even if" they see the splitting of the moon they will not believe..

The splitting of the moon can have meanings that are symbolic:

"The heaven of religions is split and the moon cleft asunder and the peoples of the earth are brought together in a new resurrection."

(Baha'u'llah, Tablets of Baha'u'llah, p. 247)
This is a good one for the Baha'i. Of course the moon was not split in two even though photo shopped "evidence" has been made to prove it. However saying "seen" would seem to prove at least the literal intent of the story in Islam. It even claimed it appeared in two halves on two sides of a mountain. However I am sure Baha'i will deny that it was even intended as literal. It is only left to see how? Let it roll artha:
 

Galen.Iksnudnard

Active Member
Respect for Islam and their prophet, Muhammad, is an ingrained part of Baha'i belief. If it was otherwise, we would never have heard of the Baha'i faith because followers of Islam would have eradicated all traces of the Baha'i's founders.

You're absolutely right YmirGF. We know so little about the indigenous Arab religions because the Muslims exterminated them shortly after attaining power. I have been reading into the history of Islam and Islam is unique in the amount of savagery and hatred it displays towards "the other".

That said, I have been reading about the life of Muhammad and I have to say that at least from what I have read, Muhammad could rank of one of history's worst and most brutal tyrants, on par with Stalin or Hitler. I'm probably going to get flak for saying this, as a "religious forum" is probably going to want to be "Islam-friendly" but that's my honest opinion and I see no point in being politically correct when it comes to Islam.
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
You're absolutely right YmirGF. We know so little about the indigenous Arab religions because the Muslims exterminated them shortly after attaining power. I have been reading into the history of Islam and Islam is unique in the amount of savagery and hatred it displays towards "the other".

That said, I have been reading about the life of Muhammad and I have to say that at least from what I have read, Muhammad could rank of one of history's worst and most brutal tyrants, on par with Stalin or Hitler. I'm probably going to get flak for saying this, as a "religious forum" is probably going to want to be "Islam-friendly" but that's my honest opinion and I see no point in being politically correct when it comes to Islam.
Just say with all due respect every once is a while. If you say "with all due respect", "in my opinion", or "evolution shows explains": you can literally say anything after that. I have been an almost one man show in this thread for the non-Islam side for a while, glad to see some new posters.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Just say with all due respect every once is a while. If you say "with all due respect", "in my opinion", or "evolution shows explains": you can literally say anything after that. I have been an almost one man show in this thread for the non-Islam side for a while, glad to see some new posters.
Hey, I try to help when I think you need it. For the most part, you are doing very well, regardless of what your detractors would have readers believe. Just sayin'... :D

Some of us are following this thread - with interest. It does help to be well informed on the subject to begin with though and that is where the vast majority are at a disadvantage. To those who know little about Islam or the life of Muhammad, virtually all we know about him and the early days of Islam is written by ardent followers. It is because of this inherent fanaticism that there is also an inherent white-washing, giving Muhammad a much higher profile that unbiased scholars might have been inclined to pass down to us.

When you see the vast array of things the Muslim chroniclers thought to tell us about you can well imagine the nature of things they may well have deliberately decided to leave well enough alone.
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
Hey, I try to help when I think you need it. For the most part, you are doing very well, regardless of what your detractors would have readers believe. Just sayin'... :D
I am lost. I was not commenting on anything you said. I was responding to another person's comments about finding critiquing Islam something that is the focus of censorship many times. I was agreeing and telling them to throw in some IMOs and no one should complain (but they will anyway). I have been debating for years and have found Muslims to be the most indifferent to historically reliable information of any. I would rather debate Islam than anything and love Shabir Alli, but most simply deny inconvenient facts instead of debating them and eventually bail in the middle of a discussion.

Some of us are following this thread - with interest. It does help to be well informed on the subject to begin with though and that is where the vast majority are at a disadvantage. To those who know little about Islam or the life of Muhammad, virtually all we know about him and the early days of Islam is written by ardent followers. It is because of this inherent fanaticism that there is also an inherent white-washing, giving Muhammad a much higher profile that unbiased scholars might have been inclined to pass down to us.
The only credit history justifies for Muhammad is not flattering. Have you ever heard Shabir. He is a better Muslim debater than all the rest of the modern crop combined and very respectful? His skill, knowledge, and sincerity is worthy of a better cause.

When you see the vast array of things the Muslim chroniclers thought to tell us about you can well imagine the nature of things they may well have deliberately decided to leave well enough alone.
If just what the accepted Muslim sources have claimed is not the lowest depths of what Muhammad has done, he must have been a human plague IMO. We have Islamic historical records of torture, murder for selfish reasons more often than not, plagiarizing, the mangling of history and Biblical events, satanic verses, curses, and womanizing. Combined with modern denials of a nation's right to exist, Islamic units of the Wauffen SS fighting for Hitler, and the ever present terrorism. I have no idea what can be worse than calling all that not just good, but Holy. But sadly your are probably right in saying there is more and worse that isn't recorded.
 

Galen.Iksnudnard

Active Member
When you see the vast array of things the Muslim chroniclers thought to tell us about you can well imagine the nature of things they may well have deliberately decided to leave well enough alone.

I think this is important to remember. The so-called "historical sources" may not be very historical at all as they were written by biased observers. Given the Islamic tendency towards taqiyya the supposedly "good" things attributed to Muhmmad may be no more true than the things published in a North Korean biography of Kim Jong Il. Certainly in both cases, the content and what that was censored are written with an agenda - that of perpetuating a mythic persona.
 

Monotheist 101

Well-Known Member
This was no posted to me but I did not understand it at all. He claimed that Muhammad was a tyrannical warlord the same as I have. This statement has no effect on that and I do not even know what it means.

It wasn't directed at you, I meant the first Guru, who was heavily influenced by Islam and Hinduism.
 

Satnaam

Conquer your mind
Respect for Islam and their prophet, Muhammad, is an ingrained part of Baha'i belief. If it was otherwise, we would never have heard of the Baha'i faith because followers of Islam would have eradicated all traces of the Baha'i's founders.

The followers of Islam eradicate traces of all religions. Be it the destructions of churches in Macedonia, Buddhist statues in Afghanistan Pakistan in the 21st century or the massacre of non-Muslims everywhere, the continued persecution of minorities in Islamic nations (Pak, Afghan, Iran etc) for centuries.
 

Satnaam

Conquer your mind
It wasn't directed at you, I meant the first Guru, who was heavily influenced by Islam and Hinduism.

Muhammad was inspired and influenced by Pagan rituals, Judaism and Christianity.

Sikhi rejects both Hinduism and Islam, don't know where you are coming from.
 

1robin

Christian/Baptist
It wasn't directed at you, I meant the first Guru, who was heavily influenced by Islam and Hinduism.
I know it wasn't and said so I believe but I can't stand having anything around me I can't figure out. I am doomed to stay frustrated I guess. I thought Gurus go back long before even Christ.
 

Satnaam

Conquer your mind
In Hinduism its more about deities, demi gods, demons, sages altough Gurus do exist, thats why I specified Sikh Gurus. The ten Sikh Gurus are central in Sikhi but in Hinduism its more the three Gods and the 330 million other Gods Godesses so Gurus are, you may say, 'less important' there.

Guru means the one who brings you from darkness to light, the dispeller of ignorance (darkness) through wisdom (lightening) and this word does indeed predate Sikhi. Hindus can call any spiritual teacher a Guru but Sikhs only have had 10 'physical' Gurus and after that the Word (Guru Granth Sahib) became Guru.
 
Last edited:

1robin

Christian/Baptist
In Hinduism its more about deities, demi gods, demons, sages altough Gurus do exist, thats why I specified Sikh Gurus. The ten Sikh Gurus are central in Sikhi but in Hinduism its more the three Gods and the 330 million other Gods Godesses so Gurus are, you may say, 'less important' there.

Guru means the one who brings you from darkness to light, the dispeller of ignorance (darkness) through wisdom (lightening) and this word does indeed predate Sikhi. Hindus can call any spiritual teacher a Guru but Sikhs only have had 10 'physical' Gurus and after that the Word (Guru Granth Sahib) became Guru.
I have debated Hindus but the faith seems to exist in as many forms as there are Hindus and none of them are rational to me. I am familiar with their 1,2,3 ...... or 330 million Gods or claims to such. I debated one Hindu who declared that only a Guru could teach true Hinduism. I told him I do not have time to search tree tops, holes in the ground, or mystical mountains for these illusive men and could he put me in touch with one. He said he could not but insisted they have been a central part of at least his form of Hinduism for thousands of years.

I have gathered this so far.

1. Gurus existed in Hinduism for a very long time but are not necessarily as prominent an office as in Sikh.
2. You have a first Guru and ten other principle gurus that began in year 14?? AD.
 

Satnaam

Conquer your mind
Lets say this. Guru = spiritual teacher, master. The term has existed for thousand of years and some Hindu spiritual men were called Gurus (teachers). In Hinduism as a whole they are less important than the millions of gods, godesses demi gods BUT some sects exist where they do worship their Guru (the learned guy, teacher).

The difficulty here is that Hinduism is not really a religion but its many different religions and schools of thought. There are polytheistic schools but there are even monotheistic or atheistic schools of thought within what we classify today as Hinduism.

Coming back to Guru lets just say its the Indian equivalent of 'Lama'.


I'll try to explain it in 'abrahamic' terminology. We have had 10 prophets. The first prophet was Nanak Dev (born 1469 A.D.), born in a Hindu family but he rejected those practises. He preached 'Sikhi' to the masses. After him, there were 9 more Prophets. They had direct contact with the One (Lord) and had revelations which they wrote down. Their writings and some of their disciples were collected and put in the Granth Sahib by the prophets themselves. When the last prophet left this world physically in 1708 A.D. he declared that there will be no more human prophets but the prophet would be the Word of the Granth (we call it Shabad).
Since our equivalent of prophet, Lama or Hazrat (for Muslims) is Guru we use that as a prefix to our Gurus names. We have 10 Gurus and the 11th Guru is our scripture (Guru Granth Sahib, Guru prefix, Granth means book and Sahib as a token of respect).
 
Last edited:
Top