• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Was Muhammad a Messenger of God?

Was Muhammad a Messenger of God?


  • Total voters
    57

siti

Well-Known Member
Christ never taught anyone to conquer the world by the sword, to do that is to kill people and steal their possessions. He taught conquest by sharing the Gospel, so people would be saved from their sins.
Hmmm! Well first off - that's actually not true - (Matthew 10:34; Luke 12:49-51). Second, if you replace Christ with Muhammad and Gospel with Qur'an you have exactly the same argument that Muslims make for Islam as a religion of peace. But something that Jesus is credited with saying is "by their fruits ye shall know them" (Matthew 7:15-20). So if Jesus really taught his followers to live by such a lofty ethical standard, there can hardly have been more than a handful of genuine Christians around at any time in the entire 2000 years since he initiated it.
 

Danny1988

Member
This also includes unbelievers who may have been ignorantly convinced in Lucifer’s plot. This also includes Muslims, Jews, Christians, and Buddhists, and Taoists and primordial religionists
This includes everyone who heard the Gospel of Jesus Christ and rejected it. It doesn't include those who never heard, they are judged differently.
Everyone will be judged according to what they were given, those who were given much. Much will be expected of them, likewise those who were given little, little will be expected of them
 

siti

Well-Known Member
This includes everyone who heard the Gospel of Jesus Christ and rejected it. It doesn't include those who never heard, they are judged differently.
Everyone will be judged according to what they were given, those who were given much. Much will be expected of them, likewise those who were given little, little will be expected of them
So its not an IQ test then - I suppose that's just as well.
 

Danny1988

Member
Hi.....
And could you please name any Churches that are Christian?
Could you tell us how you numbered the executed Christian Saints at 50 million?


There can't be many Christians about, I guess.
There are many Christian Churches, All those who believe and preach that the Holy Bible is the final authority in all matters are Christian churches.

The Reformers exposed all the Anti Christian practices of the Roam Catholic's, so the Reformed Churches are the ones holding the banner of truth, in the world today.

It is a well documented historical fact that between 50 - 100 million Christian Saints were tortured and murdered by the order of the Pope's, from the 3rd to 19th century's. nobody knows the exact figure because the Roman Catholics burned any documents of that persons existence. They made them disappear, like they never existed.

Those who were tortured and executed were because they refused to denounce their faith in Christ and accept the Pope as God on earth. the Pope's teachings were always in stark contrast to what Christ taught, so they have always been 'Antichrist" to this day.

I left the Roman Church, when I discovered these truths. The rest of my family are still under it's deception, anyone who studies the Bible will quickly realize that the Roman Church is apostate.

Just google 'the inquisition" and how many has the Roman Catholic Church killed, I'm sure you will find lots of information.
 

Danny1988

Member
Hmmm! Well first off - that's actually not true - (Matthew 10:34; Luke 12:49-51). Second, if you replace Christ with Muhammad and Gospel with Qur'an you have exactly the same argument that Muslims make for Islam as a religion of peace. But something that Jesus is credited with saying is "by their fruits ye shall know them" (Matthew 7:15-20). So if Jesus really taught his followers to live by such a lofty ethical standard, there can hardly have been more than a handful of genuine Christians around at any time in the entire 2000 years since he initiated it.
you don't posses the truth so I have to dismiss your ranting as nonsense. You try to add evil to what Jesus said, when He said He didn't come to bring peace into he world.

You make that say that He bought violence into the world, when it doesn't mean any such thing. That's why I said, you're not qualified to interpret scripture. Only those who have the gift of the Holy Spirit are able to.

Christ will come as a man of war when he returns, then He will exact punishment on the unbelievers. The first time He came to save all those who believe in Him, the second time will be to cast all the non believers into the lake of fire to be tormented day and night forever and ever.

Christ there would be no peace in the world until he casts all the unbelievers into the lake of fire, that's why He said he didn't come to bring peace the first time around.
 

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher
This includes everyone who heard the Gospel of Jesus Christ and rejected it. It doesn't include those who never heard, they are judged differently.
Everyone will be judged according to what they were given, those who were given much. Much will be expected of them, likewise those who were given little, little will be expected of them

Like I said no matter how you brush it, Christianity is no different than those that believe only 144,000 people will go to heaven. the prince of peace will kill people in the end. Nothing peaceful and only one particular people of one religion will enter paradise. Still no different than other dogmatic faiths.
 

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher
you don't posses the truth so I have to dismiss your ranting as nonsense. You try to add evil to what Jesus said, when He said He didn't come to bring peace into he world.

You make that say that He bought violence into the world, when it doesn't mean any such thing. That's why I said, you're not qualified to interpret scripture. Only those who have the gift of the Holy Spirit are able to.

Christ will come as a man of war when he returns, then He will exact punishment on the unbelievers. The first time He came to save all those who believe in Him, the second time will be to cast all the non believers into the lake of fire to be tormented day and night forever and ever.

Christ there would be no peace in the world until he casts all the unbelievers into the lake of fire, that's why He said he didn't come to bring peace the first time around.

So you encourage the suffering of people who exercise the very freewill God gave them? BTW how do you discern truth from non-truth? Is the Westboro Baptist Church more truthful than St. Mark AME Church? Or is Divinity Christian Church in the city of Lynwood California more truthful than Grace Christian Church in the state of Michigan? How do we know who is following the correct path? Reading the Bible on your own is not enough, if such were true then you wouldn't need scholars to interpret the Biblical passages. Surely, you don't need scholars to interpret a Dr. Seuss book right?
 

wandering peacefully

Which way to the woods?
"Christ there would be no peace in the world until he casts all the unbelievers into the lake of fire, that's why He said he didn't come to bring peace the first time around."

Frankly, I'd rather spend eternity in a lake of fire than to be forever stuck in the same place as someone evil enough to spend 2,500+ years drooling over killing a bunch of his creations. He sounds like a sociopath with no life to me.
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
I have seen this explained many times by Baha'i. I agree it is a plausible explanation.

Muhammad was the seal of the prophets. The age of Prophecy from Adam to Muhammad had ended.

The Holy books then all talk of an age of fulfilment, the Bible prays for Thy Kingdom Come.

Thus the Bab and Baha'u'llah have ushered in the age of Fulfilment and if I remember correctly it will last for 500,000 years.

Peace be with you always.
What is the Baha'i definition of a manifestation of God? And how does Adam and Muhammad fit that definition?
 

TransmutingSoul

One Planet, One People, Please!
Premium Member
What is the Baha'i definition of a manifestation of God? And how does Adam and Muhammad fit that definition?

Hello thank you for the question. Google is a friend for me. :)

I do not see Adam listed, but the way I see it explained is that all Gods Messnegers are the same Holy Spirit.

Thus I see it that a Person is born of that Holy Spirit in each age God gives a Message. That Holy Spirit is the Christ in Jesus, thus Christ, the First and Last.

This is the same Holy Spirit in Muhammad.

Peace be upon you.
 

Danny1988

Member
Like I said no matter how you brush it, Christianity is no different than those that believe only 144,000 people will go to heaven. the prince of peace will kill people in the end. Nothing peaceful and only one particular people of one religion will enter paradise. Still no different than other dogmatic faiths.
Every religion in the world is the same except for Christianity, Christ is the only One who claimed to be God. He is the only One who proved that He was God. All of the other false prophets died and were buried, Christ went back to heaven.

Christianity is the only unique faith, it's the only one that was proven true. The rest are all false, and their followers are all deceived. You will bow down and worship Christ on judgement day, as everyone else will but it will be too late to repent and be saved then. If you face Him in your unrepentant unsaved state, He will cast you into hell where you will be tormented forever.
 

siti

Well-Known Member
you don't posses the truth so I have to dismiss your ranting as nonsense. You try to add evil to what Jesus said, when He said He didn't come to bring peace into he world.

You make that say that He bought violence into the world, when it doesn't mean any such thing. That's why I said, you're not qualified to interpret scripture. Only those who have the gift of the Holy Spirit are able to.

Christ will come as a man of war when he returns, then He will exact punishment on the unbelievers. The first time He came to save all those who believe in Him, the second time will be to cast all the non believers into the lake of fire to be tormented day and night forever and ever.

Christ there would be no peace in the world until he casts all the unbelievers into the lake of fire, that's why He said he didn't come to bring peace the first time around.
If Jesus really taught his followers non-violence - where are all the Christians? Apart from the Quakers and JWs, I don't see many of them refusing military service or positively supporting pacifism or disarmament - do you? Jesus did (reportedly) say that "they that take the sword shall perish with the sword" and one result of his teaching that was prophesied in the OT was that "they will beat their swords into plowshares" and "neither shall they learn war any more" (Matthew 26:52; Isaiah 2:4). Christians have not followed the teaching of Christ or fulfilled the prophecy have they? What hope is there that they ever will?
 

Danny1988

Member
So you encourage the suffering of people who exercise the very freewill God gave them? BTW how do you discern truth from non-truth? Is the Westboro Baptist Church more truthful than St. Mark AME Church? Or is Divinity Christian Church in the city of Lynwood California more truthful than Grace Christian Church in the state of Michigan? How do we know who is following the correct path? Reading the Bible on your own is not enough, if such were true then you wouldn't need scholars to interpret the Biblical passages. Surely, you don't need scholars to interpret a Dr. Seuss book right?
Forget hiding behind false Churches and using them as an excuse for ignorance. Jesus will ask you what you have done with the gift He gave you.

He didn't come and suffer untold pain for you to look to false prophets and judge Him by their actions. You need to deal with what Jesus taught and commanded, never mind what others say about Him. They will be judged for their deeds.

Christ has made it possible for you to have a relationship with Him, all you need to do is turn from your sin, repent and believe in Him. He will do the rest, all you do is follow Him and He will lead you into everlasting paradise and give you all the treasures of the universe.

your right, we are not all called to be Bible scholars. If you ask God in prayer to show you the truth He will reveal it to you and you will find other true believers and join them. So when you have the truth in you, you won't need to seek it in other men. You will instinctively know who gods people are and you will find a whole new world of brothers and sisters.
 

Danny1988

Member
If Jesus really taught his followers non-violence - where are all the Christians? Apart from the Quakers and JWs, I don't see many of them refusing military service or positively supporting pacifism or disarmament - do you? Jesus did (reportedly) say that "they that take the sword shall perish with the sword" and one result of his teaching that was prophesied in the OT was that "they will beat their swords into plowshares" and "neither shall they learn war any more" (Matthew 26:52; Isaiah 2:4). Christians have not followed the teaching of Christ or fulfilled the prophecy have they? What hope is there that they ever will?
You can't just pluck verses out of their intended context and abuse them to propagate you agenda.

It's painfully obvious that Jesus taught that it was OK to defend yourself from evil and wicked men. We don't lie down and wait to be slaughtered by the enemy, so of' course we must take up our weapons ad fight.
 

Prestor John

Well-Known Member
That is good to know.
Please remember it because I’m sure I’m going to say something that will set someone off.
I agree that truth is one but there are many perceptions of that One truth.
This is similar to what I said in post #415,

“Each of us can have our own preferences and perceptions of what is truth, but those preferences and perceptions do not make or change reality.”
Its a little like the parable of the elephant where each has a part of the elephant and makes his conclusions accordingly, The blind man holding the tail believes it to be a snake. The man with his arms around a leg belives it to be the trunk of a tree.
I am fond of this parable, but I think it ignores something crucial - The existence of prophets.

A true prophet is not “blind” like the other men in this parable. Through the lens of revelation, he can see what the others cannot.

A true prophet, when likened to this parable, would be able to see the part of the elephant before him and recognize that it is indeed an elephant’s tail or leg.

He would not be able to see the entire elephant. Just like no man can know everything about God. However, he will be able to see what the Lord decides to show him.

I believe the Lord has revealed many truths through His prophets, both ancient and modern, and these truths can be found today in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. It is the Kingdom of God upon the Earth.

Just as the parable teaches, “blind men” cannot lead anyone to truth. It will take a true prophet.
Jesus is the 'Son of God' but not in the manner that you and I would have a child.
I disagree and believe that the Lord Jesus Christ is God the Father’s literal son, both spiritually and physically.

Before His birth in mortality the Lord Jesus Christ was a spirit child of God known as Jehovah (Yahweh) and He, under the direction of Our Heavenly Father, was the God of Israel who created the physical universe.

When the time came for Jehovah to dwell with Man, according to the covenant He made with Abraham, Mary was chosen to be His mortal mother, and with some process involving the Holy Spirit, God the Father implanted His genetic material into Mary thus making the Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God, both spiritually and physically.

He was as much Man as He was God.
Muslims believe in the virgin birgin birth and see Mary the mother of Jesus as the greatest woman of her time. A whole chapter of the Quran is dedicated to her.
That’s right. I think they also claim that Mary was only a little girl at the time.

Even though I believe that Muhammad is not a true prophet and that the teachings of Islam are not completely true, I never meant to claim that everything that Islam believes and teaches is wrong or incorrect.

As the old adage goes, “A broken clock is still right twice a day.” :)
Some Muslim scholars argue that Jesus was not physically the 'son of God' but spiritually the 'Son of God'. Muslims are obliged to believe in the all the prophets that have gone before with special emphasis on Moses and Jesus.
That’s the problem with following after “blind men” that do not have the spirit of revelation.
I believe He is a true prophet for the same reason I believe Moses and Jesus to be true prophets. Each brought a Revelation from God that utterly transformed the lives of their followers for many generations. Each revelation is recorded in a book for us to study. That is the Torah, Gospel, and Quran. Each though born at very different times in remarkably different civilisations, were nonetheless outstanding in the manner they lived their lives. Because of all of this, they are more than mere prophets. They are Manifestations of God Himself, each with a designated title to highlight their uniqueness and specialness. Moses was the friend of God, Jesus the Son of God, and Muhammad the Messenger of God.
That is interesting, yet something I can never wholly agree with.

Moses and Muhammad were just men. I believe that Moses was a true prophet while Muhammad was not.

My opinion about Muhammad as a man is a mixed bag, and ultimately unimportant. I’ve heard good and bad about him.

I cannot accept him as a true prophet because he denies the divinity of Christ, His role as the Savior, Redeemer and Mediator for all Creation and Mankind’s reliance on Him for existence, salvation, exaltation or any good thing.
Agreed. That is what the parable of the elephant is about.
Ok good. I thought you missed that.
Some of us have a mixture of true and false beliefs. We are human are we not? I think you are being too black and white.
Of course! I did not say that “everything we believe in is either right or wrong” I said, “Either what we believe in is right or it is wrong”.

I know that there are some things I believe in that are not true. I know that to be fact because I am not yet perfect.

However, that does not change the fact that whatever is true is true and everything else is false.

Believing that an elephant’s leg is a tree is false. It will never be true. It does not matter how much you want it to be a tree. It is not and will never become a tree.
Both Christans and Muslims have had major disagreements and even schisms over differences of belief. It is our perception that differs, not the fundamental underlying truths.
True and completely irrelevant. Our perception does not affect what is truth.

Believing Muhammad is a prophet does not make him so, just as believing that Jesus Christ is the literal Son of God does not make Him so.

According to my perception (which I believe to be the truth) Jesus Christ is divine, therefore Muhammad cannot be a true prophet.
God in His love for the whole of humanity has guided different peoples at different times.
Correct. The Book of Mormon is a clear example of that and actually mentions how God gives to His children only what they can handle.

Some can handle more than others. Those who take and accept what has been revealed can eventually come to receive more.

That’s another reason I cannot believe that Muhammad was a true prophet because he claimed that he was the last.

God’s work is not finished as long as mortal Man is upon the Earth. Therefore, He would not stop calling prophets to guide His children.
We would agree on Moses and Jesus being examples of His guidance. We disagree on Muhammad. You believe Jesus visited America and the claims of Joseph Smith. Baha'is believe in Baha'u'llah. The Baha'i Faith and Mormonism are not the main point of disussion here. We are talking about Muhammad and Islam.
It is because of my LDS beliefs that I cannot believe that Muhammad is a true prophet.

So, if you're talking to me, they are going to come up.
Baha'is are good with Jesus the Jewish Messiah, Saviour, Son of God, Lordship of Christ, and purity of Christ.
I have only talked with a handful of those of the Baha’i faith and they seem to try to be “good” with everyone, which reminds me of the saying, “If you stand for everything, you stand for nothing.”
Let's focus on Muhammad and the Quran and why He is or isn't the Messenger of God whom He claimed to be.
I honestly do not think there is anything more to say.

I’m willing to discuss these things and learn, but there are some things he denies that I have come to believe are absolute truths.

And I cannot be swayed.
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
There are many Christian Churches, All those who believe and preach that the Holy Bible is the final authority in all matters are Christian churches.
Do you follow Yeshua's mission, or Paul's?

It is a well documented historical fact that between 50 - 100 million Christian Saints were tortured and murdered ...... the Roman Catholics burned any documents ........
That doesn't seem to be very well documented, then.
Where I live they burned Catholics and Protestants on the same day but in different cities, but that was 4-500 years ago. So the Protestants became Saints and the Catholics all went to Hell?
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
There is almost zero information about what either of them really said or did - apart from Muslim and Christian tradition - aka, the Qur'an, Hadith and Sira for Muhammad and the Gospels (and not much else) in the case of Jesus. If these sources are not accurate, then Muhammad did not exist "as the person attested to in Muslim tradition" - which is exactly what I said but of course you cherry-picked the "exist" part of my sentence and ignored the rest.

However, there is a great deal of information in those sources that presents a plausible and meaningful narrative regarding either Muhammad or Christ. It’s true there is as much variability in those narratives as there are theologies. You can complain about the gaps and accuracy ad nauseam but they have proved incredibly effective as a focal point for their followers.

Good to know you acknowledge their existence so the question becomes who were they? I’m not intending to be difficult.

Well that's not much of a recommendation quite frankly - and of course you know that very well - which is why you are making it a Qur'an vs Bible thing that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

It’s hugely important for many of us who are comfortable with our Christian backgrounds to know when we embark on our study of Muhammad that the sources of verifiable information are at least as good if not better than Christianity. It has everything to do with the topic at hand because for many of us, Christ, Moses and the OT prophets are our point of reference for considering who is a Messenger of God and who is not. If you don’t sincerely believe that any of the biblical figures were Messengers of God, then of course you won’t see Muhammad as one either.


What early sources? There are only two or three manuscripts from before the 8th century including one of which the text varies considerably with the later standardized texts. It was the 3rd Caliph - Uthman - I believe that began the standardization of the text - about 650AD - but presumably you don't claim that Uthman was a Messenger of God - and yet the actual text we depend on today was apparently determined by him - or more accurately - a committee he set up to standardize the text...

The authenticity of the Quran as opposed to a criticism of what it teaches looks solid to me.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Quran

...anyway, there are, I believe only a very small number (less than ten perhaps) of extant copies of parts of the Qur'an that date to earlier than 2 centuries into the Islamic period.

That’s a lot.

But the Qur'an tells us almost nothing about his life - only - if we can trust the text (but see above) - about messages he is believed to have received from God via the angel Gabriel.

That’s a matter of opinion:

Modern scholars differ in their assessment of the Quran as a historical source about Muhammad's life.

According to the Encyclopedia of Islam, the "Qur'an responds constantly and often candidly to Muhammad's changing historical circumstances and contains a wealth of hidden data that are relevant to the task of the quest for the historical Muhammad."In contrast, Solomon A. Nigosian writes that the Quran tells us very little about the life of Muhammad.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Muhammad

Oh please Adrian - we have been over and over this so many times...first, far more people have been entirely unaffected and uninfluenced by it, second, there is no question that violence and subjugation were at the root of the spread of Islam just as it was for the spread of Christianity - and you surely cannot be recommending the Qur'an as a positive influence in the 20th and 21st centuries...have you watched the news or a read a newspaper recently?

Your being negative and dismissive again.

Well I'm not "many westerners" - I'm just one and one that does not subscribe to a standard western view of the world. If God really told Muhammad to subjugate the Arabian peninsula at the point of a sword and chop the heads off people who chose non-compliance with the edicts of the book he himself dictated then fine - but I'm guessing that God didn't really tell him to do that...what do you think?

I suspect that a significant number of the men of the Banu Qurayza tribe were killed, but beyond that I would be wildly speculating as opposed to just speculating. The affect of this action was to send a clear and stern Message to other Arabian tribes to follow both the spirit and law of any pact made with the Muslims. It was a crucial reason why the tribes became united.
 
Last edited:

Epic Beard Man

Bearded Philosopher
Every religion in the world is the same except for Christianity, Christ is the only One who claimed to be God. He is the only One who proved that He was God. All of the other false prophets died and were buried, Christ went back to heaven.

Christianity is the only unique faith, it's the only one that was proven true. The rest are all false, and their followers are all deceived. You will bow down and worship Christ on judgement day, as everyone else will but it will be too late to repent and be saved then. If you face Him in your unrepentant unsaved state, He will cast you into hell where you will be tormented forever.

So in your view Judaism, a much older faith than Christianity is false?
 

Danny1988

Member
Do you follow Yeshua's mission, or Paul's?


That doesn't seem to be very well documented, then.
Where I live they burned Catholics and Protestants on the same day but in different cities, but that was 4-500 years ago. So the Protestants became Saints and the Catholics all went to Hell?
Christ and Paul and Paul preached the same message, so you need to go back and educate yourself.

I'm not sure where you get your information about the history of the RCC, but I would suggest you broaden your search to include independent sources and stop swallowing RCC propaganda.
 

Danny1988

Member
So in your view Judaism, a much older faith than Christianity is false?
Judaism, has been superseded by Christianity. So it's no longer relevant in it's original form. Man kind has a New covenant to submit himself to now. Christ fulfilled the whole of the old covenant law on our behalf, as it was impossible to keep.

Now all we need to do is believe in the finished work of Christ for our salvation, we don't need to fulfill any laws to be saved any more.
 
Top