Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
So, Muslims, what do you call the religion practiced in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran and Iraq? The rest of us call it "Islam."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So, Muslims, what do you call the religion practiced in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran and Iraq? The rest of us call it "Islam."
What do you call the religion Jim Jones practiced in The People's Church? Most people would call it Christianity.
Your point is????
Regards,
Scott
My point is to try to clarify and define what we're talking about. I don't know what the Muslims in this thread mean by the word "Islam." It seems to refer to something that doesn't actually exist, according to them. Since it doesn't exist, I don't have a problem with it. However, the rest of the world uses this word to the religion practiced in Saudi Arabia. Do you disagree?
And why are we talking about Christianity?
You'd be referring to the People's Temple NOT the People's Church (different kettles of fish there) and by the comparison are we to assume that the religion practiced by the aforementioned countries is a cult, headed by a charismatic but paranoid and drug addled nutbag?What do you call the religion Jim Jones practiced in The People's Church? Most people would call it Christianity.
Your point is????
Regards,
Scott
You'd be referring to the People's Temple NOT the People's Church (different kettles of fish there) and by the comparison are we to assume that the religion practiced by the aforementioned countries is a cult, headed by a charismatic but paranoid and drug addled nutbag?
It's unfortunate for religions that the nutbags find themselves in such elevated positions.Well, in the case of the extremist mullaheen and imams, yes they are paranoid and hate-addled nutbags. That does not reflect upon Islam, though, just the power tactics of those aforementioned hate-addled nutbags.
Regards,
Scott
It's unfortunate for religions that the nutbags find themselves in such elevated positions.
nutbagsYou'd be referring to the People's Temple NOT the People's Church (different kettles of fish there) and by the comparison are we to assume that the religion practiced by the aforementioned countries is a cult, headed by a charismatic but paranoid and drug addled nutbag?
Not just in Iran, either.popeyeses i am not sure whether to admire your defense of islam a religion that considers you a heritic and persecutes your members in iran.
Don't tell Charlton Heston; he'll start thinking he's Zoroaster.Muhammed is a Manifestation of God to Baha`i's co-equal to Moses, Zoroaster, Jesus, Baha`u'llah.
Well, in the case of the extremist mullaheen and imams, yes they are paranoid and hate-addled nutbags. That does not reflect upon Islam, though, just the power tactics of those aforementioned hate-addled nutbags.
Regards,
Scott
But it does reflect on islam,the ayatollahs the extremist organisations etc all reflect on islam especially when muslims when pressed to condemn their actions say they cannot make a judgement or there is insufficient evidence.
For some reason, this concept seems unclear to people..They do not reflect upon Muhammed OR the Qur'an. THAT is Islam. The Pharisees when they manuevered the Romans to execute Christ did NOT refelect upon Moses and the Torah.
One cannot hold the Prophet and the Book responsible for the actions of deluded followers. It is not the fault of the religion that some followers are deluded.
We do not need to make religion a monster. We humans create more than enough self-made monsters to fill all requisitions.
Your attitude makes you a modern Ned Ludd. After all, ignorance is as ignorance does.
Not a lot of regards left,
Scott
They do not reflect upon Muhammed OR the Qur'an. THAT is Islam. The Pharisees when they manuevered the Romans to execute Christ did NOT refelect upon Moses and the Torah. then how come jews have been persecuted by christians ever since
One cannot hold the Prophet and the Book responsible for the actions of deluded followers. It is not the fault of the religion that some followers are deluded. even when they are religiously deluded ?
We do not need to make religion a monster. We humans create more than enough self-made monsters to fill all requisitions. yes we have created religious maniacs
Your attitude makes you a modern Ned Ludd. After all, ignorance is as ignorance does. Ned Ludd was an 18th century hero, with no historical evidence for his existance
Not a lot of regards left,
Scott
the answer is in some countries yes exactly the same and this concept does seem unclear to some people particularly MuslimsFor some reason, this concept seems unclear to people..
England my lionheart, do muslims now look like muslims 700 years ago?!
I'm sorry, but a "yes they do" answer would reflect you lack of historical knowledge ...A "no they dont" answer would just answer your question!