If this all-knowing, all-powerful God had foreseen that humans would fall into moral degradation, then it appears sinister and sadistic of such a God to create them, knowing they would fail to meet his divine expectations. Why would such a God then destroy them out of regret in a global flood or punish those born afterward and require a blood sacrifice of his son to redeem them for behaving precisely as he foresaw they would before he created them?
Yes, that God, the one in the Bible and NT created everything and almost takes responsibility for everything. He sends plagues and other things to punish people for not doing as he wants. And then promises to reward those that believe in him and do as he says. But atheists don't believe in that God and then there are Baha'is, mostly one Baha'i, that doesn't believe it either.
I've asked before and no doubt I'll ask again, how do you know what your god wants?
Some religious people act as if they "know" because they believe their Scriptures are the Word of God. So, no matter what, their Scriptures are true. But one religion's Scriptures aren't necessarily true for another religion.
Yes i know disease evolved, no god involved. What i am questioning is "god created everything.. oh, except the stuff i don't like" usually by people who do not believe in evolution so they cannot claim disease evolved.
So, here comes the Baha'is. For some or most Bible-believing Christian God created everything. There is no such thing as evolution. But for Baha'is, the Bible creation story isn't literally true, and they do believe in evolution. And this one Baha'is likes to use that as a way to blame the mistakes humans have made as the cause of lots of the bad things in the world... like some diseases. But where did the first harmful bacteria and viruses come from? Maybe God? And then they evolved and got worse? Or, originally, God created only good bacteria and viruses, then, because they had free-will, some turned evil?
Don't be silly, the manufacturer is responsible for the car, hence the warranty, not the driver.
Humans aren't cars. This one Baha'i tries to find ways to make people, not God responsible. The analogy would be more like a manufacturer of self-driving cars. The person gets in one and the car runs over people, side-swipes several cars, then goes over a cliff. That might be a glitch in the workings of the car.
So, as believed by some religious people, God created humans and wired them in such a way that they had the ability to make bad choices. And it's not his fault when they do make bad choices?
Of course God isn't responsible for anything. Because things that don't exist cannot be the cause of things that do.
And this is the most important point, does such a God exist? We know the world is screwed up, and if a person wants to believe in a God, how do they explain it? For many, it's people, Satan or anything but their all-knowing and, for some, an all-loving God. Christians have an explanation. God-believing Hindus have another one. Baha'i have a different one. Of course, to the Baha'i, theirs is the correct one.
Such a god would be the cause of everything.
If such a god exists, then things are exactly like it expected they'd be. And for some reason, they are exactly how it wanted them to be.
For those that believe in a God, and don't want him responsible? Fine, explain away on how you explain your God's responsibility away. And then tell everybody how logical and rational your explanation is. But how rational is it to believe in something you can't see and can't prove? And are only going by what one man and his religion said about that God?