He rose from the dead and ascended into heaven. If not true, how could his followers have pulled that off?
Jesus' followers did not pull anything off. They were hapless victims of Christianity which teaches these things.
But now you will say that the Bible says that Jesus did these things. Anyone can write a story about Jesus but there is no evidence that Jesus ever rose from the dead, so it is a faith-based belief. As for ascending into heaven, the Bible does not say that the physical body of Jesus ascended into heaven, that is only a Christian interpretation of a few verses.
Yet, the supposed latest messenger, Baha'u'llah and his followers say it didn't happen. Dead people don't come back to life after three days. And they don't float up into the sky.
So, any Baha'i claiming all this stuff about messengers and evidence is not being honest. They don't even believe the "evidence" provided by the followers of Jesus. All they believe is what their guy said. And he said Jesus was a prophet... That's good enough for them. But then Baha'is deny the details of Jesus and I think probably every other person they claim were true messengers.
There is no evidence that indicates that the New Testament is an accurate depiction of history and that is why we don't believe what it says happened unless it was confirmed by Baha'u'llah or Abdu'l-Baha. Why should we believe in the Bible when we have our own scriptures? We are not Christians. I do not expect Christians to believe in the Baha'i Writings.
Baha'u'llah or Abdu'l-Baha said a lot about Jesus, not that He was only a prophet, but that He was the Spirit of God and a Manifestation of God.
Bahais do not need what was written in the New Testament in order to know who Jesus was or what He did on His mission. Some of what the NT says is accurate, but so much of it is just embellishments, and I have no need to wade through all that in order to know about Jesus.
By the time we're done, all that's left is... all that is true and all that we need to know and trust is what their guy said. To me, that's no different than any other religion that claims their prophet and their beliefs are the only way.
Baha'is do not claim that Baha'u'llah and the Baha'i Faith are 'the only way.' That is what Christians claim about Jesus and Christianity. Baha'is believe that all religions are true in their essence, meaning their spiritual teachings, but that the Baha'i Faith has the latest message from God that is pertinent to the age we live in.
Which means, you are automatically wrong. They don't need to investigate and listen. The things you say don't agree with them, therefore... you must be wrong. And what's weird, Baha'is are against being prejudice against others for their beliefs. And what was that about "actions speak louder than words"?
Prejudice: preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.
prejudice meaning - Google Search
Baha'is are not prejudiced against Christians or any other religious people simply because we have different beliefs.
Moreover, our opinion is based on reason and actual experience of what Christianity teaches.
Some things that Christianity teaches are wrong since Christianity wandered far from what was recorded in the New Testament, and created false doctrines. Why should Baha'is pretend we believe those doctrines? That would be dishonest.
“It has long been generally believed that Jesus Christ was a unique incarnation of God such as had never before appeared in religious history and would never appear again. This tenet made the acceptance of any later Prophet impossible to a Christian.
Yet there is nothing in Christ’s own statements, as recorded in the Gospel, to support this view, and it was not generally held during His lifetime.
Another opinion which Christians universally hold about Christ is that His teaching was absolute and final. They believe that if the Truth were partly withheld from them for a time because they could not bear it, it was divulged at Pentecost in its fullness and that now nothing remains to be revealed.
But there is nothing in the account of Pentecost to suggest such an interpretation and there is no one who will believe that Jesus would have named the false prophets as characteristic of His age if this warning was to be followed by an immediate release of all Truth to the Church. What the Bible shows is rather a succession of teachers—Abraham, Moses and Christ, each measuring His Revelation to the needs and maturity of His authors….
Many of these false interpretations involve repudiation of the Word of God in favor of the word of man. This impious act is so craftily performed, with such an air of humility, that it might escape the notice of the most sincere and devout of worshippers. Probably few churchgoers realize today that the Gospel of Christ as known to the few in the pulpit is wholly different from the Gospel which Christ preached in Galilee as recorded in the Bible.
In spite of Christ’s promise of further revelation of Truth, through the Comforter, through His own return, through the Spirit of Truth, the Christian Church regards His revelation as final, and itself as the sole trustee of true religion. There is no room for the Supreme Redeemer of the Bible to bring in great changes for the establishment of the Kingdom of God. In fact this Kingdom is often described as a world-wide Church.
Having thus closed God’s Covenant with the Bible, sacred history—God-directed—came to an end, and secular history, having no sense of divine destiny nor unity, began…..
Well might Christ warn His followers that false prophets would arise and misinterpret His teachings so as to delude even the most earnest and intelligent of His believers: from early times Christians have disputed about Christian truth in councils, in sects, in wars.
To sum up, if Christians say “our acts may be wrong,” they say truly. If they say “however our Gospel is right” they are quite wrong. The false prophets have corrupted the Gospel as successfully as they have the deeds and lives of Christian people.”
Christ and Baha'u'llah, The False Prophets, pp. 25-30