There are other possibilities.
Such as?
He also knows the distant future and that this evil in the world is going to be non existent then.
You're making excuses. As per your own acknowledgement, he created a world knowing before hand that he was going to have to push the "reset button", engage in genocide, command people to go on genocidal and infanticidal killing sprees, etc.
Having said that, reading these myths, it is absolutely clear to me that he in fact did NOT know before hand that he was going to "have to" do such things. He was disappointed and felt the need to punish. This does not at all fit a story where he supposedly knew before hand what would and wouldn't happen.
If I set up a path where I KNOW with absolute certainty that this path would lead to my son committing murder and being a drug addict then I can not hold my son responsible for that. It is entirely my responsability. I KNEW what was going to happen and decided to go ahead with it anyway. And then I even punish him for it... He never stood a chance. He never had a choice. It was a set-up. A trap. A trap set by yours truely.
It's absolutely insane, psychopathic, masochistic, irresponsible, immoral,...
Why do you give your god a free pass for such disugsting behaviour?
Why would your god NOT be responsible for every nasty thing that happens if it is him who created everything knowing full well what that set-up would lead to?
Suppose I have perfect foresight and KNOW that if I get my wife pregnant tonight, it would lead to the birth of Adolf Hitler who later on in life would be responsible for the massacre of 6 million jews.... Do you think I would make my wife pregnant tonight? Don't you think that I would wait till tomorrow so that such horror does not occur?
If you do something while KNOWING what horrible thing it would lead to.... why would you do it? Why would you not hold that agent accountable for those horrible things happening?
As I said, there is more to it than that.
Yes, you keep claiming that.
Can you support it / demonstrate it?
No. Let me guess: "you just gotta have faith"?
You must mean that He did not let us humans off the hook for all the evil we have done, but He accepted the death of one perfect human to pay the wages of sin that we have all earned for ourselves because of the evil deeds we have done.
Which is letting us humans off the hook ....................................................
How in the world is punishing an innocent scapegoat and letting the guilty off the hook NOT letting the guilty of the hook?????
How in the world is that remotely "justice"?
And let's not forget that the previous point still remains.... humans aren't "guilty". HE is responsible for the "wrong doings" of humans, since he set them up in a system where they had no other choice. He KNEW what would happen (according to you at least) by setting creation up the way he did. That future (according to you) was set in stone. No way to avoid it. So how are we in any way responsible for it?
If it could have turned out in another way, then your god couldn't have known beforehand what would happen.
You have dug this hole and you can't get out of it. Your statements are self-contradictory.
But of course you don't believe in the Bible God or any Gods anyway so it has nothing to do with holding anyone accountable.
I don't have to believe the characters in a story are actual real characters in order to evaluate the moral implications of said characters actions in said story.
We can perfectly have this exact same discussion about the morality of the character of Darth Vader from Star Wars or Thanos from the Marvel Universe.
This is yet another attempt of you to try and dodge the points made. As if my evaluations of the moral implication of the story aren't relevant because I don't think the story is non-fiction. It matters not.
If there is a creator who judges us then you can present your ramblings to Him and say how evil He is
If that "creator" is the bible god and the bible descriptions of him are actually accurate, then yes that is exactly what I'll do.
There also would be no point in trying to lie or whatever because if this god is how the biblical view of him is, then he'll know I'ld be lying anyway.
and that you yourself are pure and holy in comparison
I never said that.
I'm only contesting the claim the he is the definition of moral behavior and goodness. He clearly isn't.
In morals, the ends don't necessarily justify the means. If that were the case, then it would be moral to develop AI nano-technology that attacks every single chinese person identified by their DNA in order to rid the world of more then a billion chinese people which would at least partially solve over population and at the same time get rid of the nation with the most carbon emissions. This would be a positive outcome for all future generations of human kind.
But morality doesn't work that way. It would be immoral to do that. Regardless of the "long term benefits" for the future of humanity.
and that He is responsible for all evil and you for nothing.
Never said that either.
Clearly you are incapable of following a simple thought process. It's telling however that you need to resort to these types of strawman in order to try and defend yourself against the actual points made.
It tells me that you don't actually have a valid argument and that deep down, you know I'm right.
But if there is no God then you remain responsible for all the evil you have done.
I'm always responsible for my own actions
regardless of gods existing. Regardless of immoral supernatural agents killing scapegoats to absolve me of my supposed "guilt".
I'm responsible for my wrongdoings.
So is your god. So is every moral agent.
The point. You keep missing it.
I'm not the one who's trying to escape responsibility of my own actions. That would be christians who believe they were "saved" from their own guilt because some supposed "perfect" jew was killed 2 millenia ago.
But you can always tell yourself that there is really no such thing as evil except in our own imagination. We have made the idea up.
More strawman.
Try to actually address the points raised instead of this drivel.