Bad Science was very very obvious.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What if it was created by God to evolve?
- Thread starter AnthonyGiarrusso
- Start date
dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
What do you think about this ^^??? "Fractal is formed from chaos"
"Far from equilibrium processes" still fits within the model I described.
And I am still not clear on the implications on my assertion if the wording is changed from chaos to fractal.
The cancer is still an irregular malignant cellular anomoly, correct? The cells are propogating themself in an imperfect manner?
dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
@shunyadragon ,
The other aspect of the post I was replying to was genetic-disorders and diseases. These appear to be caused by random errors, mutations. Random. But I'm not an expert. Do you have anything disputing these mutations as a being described as random or chaotic?
The other aspect of the post I was replying to was genetic-disorders and diseases. These appear to be caused by random errors, mutations. Random. But I'm not an expert. Do you have anything disputing these mutations as a being described as random or chaotic?
Colt
Well-Known Member
It’s a revelatory source.
Colt
Well-Known Member
That’s my answer, it doesn’t require evidence.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It does if you want to claim to have a valid reason for your beliefs. But if you just want to be irrational that is your right too.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, I demonstrated that it was not.
Colt
Well-Known Member
That’s your opinion without proof.
Colt
Well-Known Member
You imagined that.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, I can demonstrate that is what is needed. You do not seem to understand the burden of proof.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, I showed that it came from a book of fiction. You might not be familiar with it.
Colt
Well-Known Member
As usual you are just looking to pick fights with religious people. You asked my opinion not defend a dissertation. It’s always been obvious to me that life has a creator. I don’t need to prove that to you!
Colt
Well-Known Member
Again, just the opinion of an atheist.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, I am only correcting "religious people" that make claims that they cannot support. Nor did I ask your opinion. Opinions are not worth much. You made a claim as if it were a fact. That means that you either can support it or you were in effect telling a falsehood.
Colt
Well-Known Member
We don’t need to support our statements of faith.
“It’s always been obvious to me that life isn’t an accident. The so called evidence that materialists provide could just as well be an observation of the processes that created and propels life.”
You haven't corrected anything, you have only stated your Atheist faith.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Incorrect. Atheism had nothing to do with it. It is too bad that you never applied rational reasoning to your beliefs
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You do if you want to be taken seriously. If you just want people to laugh at unsupported nonsense then feel free.
You made a statement as if it were a fact. That puts the burden of proof upon you.
And no, I corrected you, even if you are in denial. Why do you denigrate your own religion by calling rational posts by others "faith"? You are clearly using the word "faith" as an insult and even worse you have to know that it is false.
Colt
Well-Known Member
I don’t find the the theory that life invented itself to be rational. Materialists claims are as silly as Ken Hams teachings.
Colt
Well-Known Member
You take yourself too seriously!
I've always thought this was a solid middle ground