• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What if it was created by God to evolve?

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Fractal, on the other hand, typically occurs when the geometry is formed from chaos (or far-from equilibrium processes, which are quite similar to chaos as well).

What do you think about this ^^??? "Fractal is formed from chaos"

"Far from equilibrium processes" still fits within the model I described.

And I am still not clear on the implications on my assertion if the wording is changed from chaos to fractal.

The cancer is still an irregular malignant cellular anomoly, correct? The cells are propogating themself in an imperfect manner?
 

dybmh

ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
@shunyadragon ,

The other aspect of the post I was replying to was genetic-disorders and diseases. These appear to be caused by random errors, mutations. Random. But I'm not an expert. Do you have anything disputing these mutations as a being described as random or chaotic?

Screenshot_20230911_150610.jpg

Screenshot_20230911_150702.jpg
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
No, I can demonstrate that is what is needed. You do not seem to understand the burden of proof.
As usual you are just looking to pick fights with religious people. You asked my opinion not defend a dissertation. It’s always been obvious to me that life has a creator. I don’t need to prove that to you!
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
As usual you are just looking to pick fights with religious people. You asked my opinion not defend a dissertation. It’s always been obvious to me that life has a creator. I don’t need to prove that to you!
No, I am only correcting "religious people" that make claims that they cannot support. Nor did I ask your opinion. Opinions are not worth much. You made a claim as if it were a fact. That means that you either can support it or you were in effect telling a falsehood.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
No, I am only correcting "religious people" that make claims that they cannot support. Nor did I ask your opinion. Opinions are not worth much. You made a claim as if it were a fact. That means that you either can support it or you were in effect telling a falsehood.
We don’t need to support our statements of faith.

“It’s always been obvious to me that life isn’t an accident. The so called evidence that materialists provide could just as well be an observation of the processes that created and propels life.”

You haven't corrected anything, you have only stated your Atheist faith.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
We don’t need to support our statements of faith.

“It’s always been obvious to me that life isn’t an accident. The so called evidence that materialists provide could just as well be an observation of the processes that created and propels life.”

You haven't corrected anything, you have only stated your Atheist faith.
You do if you want to be taken seriously. If you just want people to laugh at unsupported nonsense then feel free.

You made a statement as if it were a fact. That puts the burden of proof upon you.

And no, I corrected you, even if you are in denial. Why do you denigrate your own religion by calling rational posts by others "faith"? You are clearly using the word "faith" as an insult and even worse you have to know that it is false.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
Incorrect. Atheism had nothing to do with it. It is too bad that you never applied rational reasoning to your beliefs
I don’t find the the theory that life invented itself to be rational. Materialists claims are as silly as Ken Hams teachings.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
You do if you want to be taken seriously. If you just want people to laugh at unsupported nonsense then feel free.

You made a statement as if it were a fact. That puts the burden of proof upon you.

And no, I corrected you, even if you are in denial. Why do you denigrate your own religion by calling rational posts by others "faith"? You are clearly using the word "faith" as an insult and even worse you have to know that it is false.
You take yourself too seriously!
 
Top