What about Uzair (a) in the Quran? His story is mentioned in Surah Baqara (2nd Chapter).Agreed.....
Tell that to the Christians.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What about Uzair (a) in the Quran? His story is mentioned in Surah Baqara (2nd Chapter).Agreed.....
Tell that to the Christians.
What about Uzair (a) in the Quran? His story is mentioned in Surah Baqara (2nd Chapter).
The God of yours is disgusting and make me want to vomit. But to each their own.L
God created both Light and Darkness. He created knowledge and ignorance. He created guidance and falsehood.
Then He gave us Mind, the power of thinking.
He gave us choice, which to choose. Light or darkness. Knowledge or Superstitious. Guidance or falsehood.
He did this, by including to types of verses. Ine type, are Muhkamaat, there are light. They are the true guidance. Another type, are Mutishabihat. These are misleading. Whoever goes after them, thinking them as literally true, taking their Apparent as true, will be Mislead.
Who is to blame? Then one who does not use his mind to distinguish light from darkness? That is how God tests.
Like I told you before, I do not know the Qur'an.What about Uzair (a) in the Quran? His story is mentioned in Surah Baqara (2nd Chapter).
The God of yours is disgusting and make me want to vomit. But to each their own.
أَوْ كَالَّذِي مَرَّ عَلَىٰ قَرْيَةٍ وَهِيَ خَاوِيَةٌ عَلَىٰ عُرُوشِهَا قَالَ أَنَّىٰ يُحْيِي هَٰذِهِ اللَّهُ بَعْدَ مَوْتِهَا ۖ فَأَمَاتَهُ اللَّهُ مِائَةَ عَامٍ ثُمَّ بَعَثَهُ ۖ قَالَ كَمْ لَبِثْتَ ۖ قَالَ لَبِثْتُ يَوْمًا أَوْ بَعْضَ يَوْمٍ ۖ قَالَ بَلْ لَبِثْتَ مِائَةَ عَامٍ فَانْظُرْ إِلَىٰ طَعَامِكَ وَشَرَابِكَ لَمْ يَتَسَنَّهْ ۖ وَانْظُرْ إِلَىٰ حِمَارِكَ وَلِنَجْعَلَكَ آيَةً لِلنَّاسِ ۖ وَانْظُرْ إِلَى الْعِظَامِ كَيْفَ نُنْشِزُهَا ثُمَّ نَكْسُوهَا لَحْمًا ۚ فَلَمَّا تَبَيَّنَ لَهُ قَالَ أَعْلَمُ أَنَّ اللَّهَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ | Or him who came upon a township as it lay fallen on its trellises. He said, ‘How will Allah revive this after its death?!’ So Allah made him die for a hundred years, then He resurrected him. He said, ‘How long did you remain?’ Said he, ‘I have remained a day or part of a day.’ He said, ‘No, you have remained a hundred years. Now look at your food and drink which have not rotted! Then look at your ***! [This was done] that We may make you a sign for mankind. And now look at its bones, how We raise them up and clothe them with flesh!’ When it became evident to him, he said, ‘I know that Allah has power over all things.’ | Al-Baqara : 259Like I told you before, I do not know the Qur'an.
However, I do not believe any stories about people being raised from the dead are actually true stories.
Nobody comes back to life after being dead for a certain length of time.
If this is the case, it's better to look for a God who didn't reveal the Quran then the disgusting deceiving one you worship.If Quran meant that people literally will be resurrected after death, or that ever such a thing happend, then it is falsehood book. It couldn't be from God.
Then it is sure a good thing that the Qur'an doesn't mean that.If Quran meant that people literally will be resurrected after death, or that ever such a thing happend, then it is falsehood book. It couldn't be from God.
So a God that doesn't bring dead bodies back to life is disgusting?If this is the case, it's better to look for a God who didn't reveal the Quran then the disgusting deceiving one you worship.
If he talks about it as if he does but is deceiving by speech that he doesn't, and in reality only a very small religion is right about it, and none of them would of thought of it that way if they didn't follow the Prophet they follow, then that is disgusting and deceiving type Lord.So a God that doesn't bring dead bodies back to life is disgusting?
No, it is Jesus that says that Jesus is not coming back, not the Baha'i Writings.They say that is not Jesus coming back as the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, that is their guy, Baha'u'llah.
That is absolutely false. Much of what Christians believe is considered true by the Baha'is, all the teachings of Jesus.It doesn't matter to a Baha'i what a Christian believes. No matter what... it is wrong.
Disagreeing with certain beliefs of other religions is not picking them apart. To agree with what we do not believe would be dishonest.But ironically, Baha'is say that all the major religion are true and from God. And then they pick apart all the beliefs and practices of the other religions and point out how they are wrong. But how does that make the Baha'i Faith true?
Work well how? Maybe they work well for the individual but that does not take into consideration society as a whole.I think their claims about God and truth are just as flawed as the beliefs of any religion. So, where does that leave us? Religions are different. They all have different beliefs and practices. And they work very well for those that believe in them.
But the old one always has to find something wrong with the new religion to justify why there is no need for a new religion.But the new one always has to find something wrong with the older religions to justify why there is a need for their religion.
It is too soon to tell what effect the Baha'i Faith will have on peace and unity.Peace and unity is what the Baha'i Faith says it can bring to the world. Can it? Is it bringing peace and unity? Actually, I'd have to say "yes".... to those who believe in it.
“And yet they bear witness to this well-known tradition: “Verily Our Word is abstruse, bewilderingly abstruse.” In another instance, it is said: “Our Cause is sorely trying, highly perplexing; none can bear it except a favorite of heaven, or an inspired Prophet, or he whose faith God hath tested.””If he talks about it as if he does but is deceiving by speech that he doesn't, and in reality only a very small religion is right about it, and none of them would of thought of it that way if they didn't follow the Prophet they follow, then that is disgusting and deceiving type Lord.
It's a not a Lord interested in guiding humanity.
It complicated, the human person of Jesus of Nazareth died on the cross. He was a Son of God in the flesh, a miraculous individua. I believe that his body was dematerialized by his unseen celestial associates. The spiritual, celestial being was still alive, he waited 3 days and began returning in a different form.Did he really die though from this perspective? From one perspective, it was a death, from another, it was a feign death. It appeared like he did die and a normal human would die, but he didn't because he remained in the world and returned. A proof of that is Jesus (a) said he was the light of the world so long as he was in this world. It doesn't make sense, that the light of God ceased at this point nor that Elijah (a) came back for this period then Jesus (a) came back to life, and then after he rose to heaven, took the role of the light/holy spirit.
What makes more sense, is that what Jesus (a) means, he will be killed in the sense a normal human would die, but he was not dead in actuality, because this foreshadowed, that Jesus (a) says he only dies if he wills it. So his spirit remained in his body, and he didn't move on, and it appeared like he was dead, but God and Jesus (a) had other plans, as shown when he comes back in three days.
And Jesus (a) can go all out in miracles, the problem with that that is God would no longer be hidden if too extensive and the day of judgment would lose it's meaning or people if subdued like people were during Solomon (a) time and Jinn were subdued, they rebel more and people hated Solomon (a) for his dominance and envied him more and saw him a sorcerer even more so when "miracles" were more common during his rule.
Solomon (a) wore a ring so that doubters would think of it giving him power. It has little to do with the ring but rather the ring helps the wielder and wielder is a greater sign then the ring.
Solomon (a) body in contrast was still and appeared alive, but he was dead. Jesus (a) body appeared dead but he was alive. This all signs for a people who believe. Ibrahim (a) was put in a fire, but his body was untouched by the fire.
Imam Hussain (a) in Karbala was given an option to be helped and victorious, but told the Angels to ascend and help Imam Mahdi (a). God never takes any of his chosen leaders life unless they will it. Solomon (a) willed it in a way that it appeared like he was alive for a long time while he was dead. He wanted to show how ignorant of the unseen the Jinn really were. Jesus (a) wanted to show that leaders of God starting from Adam (a) till now, they don't die except they will it. This means John the Baptist willed to die a martyr like Imam Hussain (a) and both of these the sky rained blood for per our hadiths.
There is a whole section in Al-Kafi that Imams (a) don't die unless they will it and God never forces it on them either. They do so out of love of God but God doesn't say "die now" either.
If this is the case, it's better to look for a God who didn't reveal the Quran then the disgusting deceiving one you worship.
The Baha'i Faith began with the Declaration of the Bab, May 23, 1844, when the Bab announced that he was a messenger of God and foretold the coming of another messenger of God in the near future.Yeah, I don't think I have ever even heard your religion until I came here some time ago. By the sound of it I would have imagined it to be some Eastern religion. Glancing at Wikipedia, I see that it was founded by Ḥusayn-ʻAlí (Baháʼu'lláh) from Persia in 1844? Or 1863? It seems confusing because of the influence of the Báb. It seems, again, at a glance, that the Bab foretold a prophet who turned out to be Baháʼu'lláh, who founded the religion.
The world might not want unity but that is what Baha'u'llah taught is necessary for humanity to survive and thrive.Unity seems a key tenant. Of religion, God and humanity. I think the world disagrees. Especially the world from which the religion comes.
I do not necessarily believe in the Adam an God according to the Bible. Since I am a Baha'i I believe what the Baha'i Writings say about Adam and Baha'u'llah. There are some similarities but also differences.Why talk about Adam and God if what you talking about isn't really Adam and God according to the Bible?
I agree that sin means to miss the mark. When we break God's laws we miss the mark. Baha'u'llah wrote His own Book of Laws which Baha'is believe are the new Laws for this age although they only binding on Baha'is.Sin means to miss the mark. Archers, stone or spear throwers, or someone using a slingshot would miss the target, it was called sin. If you are late for work you sin against your employer. If you break the speed limit you sin against your government and its law. God's law applies to specific people in specific times and places. The laws to the angels, to Adam, Noah, Moses, and Christians differ. People tend to make up their own laws in God's name. The Pharisees, for example, criticizing Jesus and his disciples for not washing their hands before eating when they actually did according to God's law. The Pharisees, self-righteously insisted you had to wash up to the elbow.
It does not matter to me if the Baha'i beliefs line up with the Bible since I do not consider the Bible inerrant. There are many errors and contradictions in the Bible. I consider the Writings of Baha'u'llah inerrant so that is what I go by. As such I believe what is in the Bible if it aligns with Baha'i beliefs but otherwise I call it into question.Have you looked into the syncretism of religion in Baha'i beliefs? Where it gets its parts that don't line up with the Bible?
Where did you ever get such an idea? We were created to know and worship God, not to enjoy ourselves.You mention Adam descendants. His children and his children's children, et cetera. The Bible says God created us for one reason. To enjoy ourselves.
I do not believe Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden represents real history so I do not believe that there was a tree with fruit which when eaten separated us from God. I believe the story was an allegoryWhat was Adam's law? Don't touch the tree or its fruit, fill and subdue the earth. We were already separated from God. God created us to fulfill his purpose. Out of love, to enjoy ourselves. He gave us a period of time in which we could become complete. The seventh day, the Sabbath, was symbolic for the seventh day of creation because in that day we would be complete and unseparated from God. The seventh day continues to this day. That's what God's Rest or God's day of rest means. (Genesis 2:2; Psalm 92:4; John 5:17; Hebrews 4:3-6)
I don't know why you are calling it guru jargon. What do you think the Bible sounds like to someone who never read it before? It is the most confusing and contradictory book of all time. The meanings of verses are not even agreed upon by Christians.Though I'm always cautious with words like soul, spirit, sin, God, world et cetera, since the meanings or applications of words like that can be misleading. This guru jargon isn't exclusive to religion. You can see it in philosophy, psychology, economics, politics, science. It's unfortunate in two distinct ways. 1. It deceives the believer and 2. repels the practical thinker. Ultimately casting a shadow on truth, making it repulsive and obscuring it. Jesus and Jehovah didn't teach mysterious. He explained practical things he could easily explain.
He meant our life in this material world, specifically the things we find pleasurable that lead to sin and separate us from God.But what did Jesus mean by the world was, exactly?
I believe that Eden is allegorical representing paradise but it was not a real place that existed.What puzzles me is why wouldn't Eden be real and why would everything else be real but the story allegorical?
I did not say I believe that spirit beings were created. I believe that humans become spirit beings and some of them are angels.There are two problems with spirit beings having been created, Genesis 2:1; Psalm 148:2, 5 says he did create them and why would the angels that forsook their original position become humans? (Genesis 6:1-4; Jude 1:6; 2 Peter 2:4; 1 Peter 3:19-20; Ephesians 6:12)
Because God sent Adam from the spiritual world of freedom to the earth, which is world of bondage.Why would Adam have been taken from freedom to be put into bondage?
Sorry, I am not familiar with the details in the Bible, but I do not believe there was ever a woman called Eve, as that is part of the allegorical story.The word prophet means to tell. Adam was a prophet in that he told Eve about God's instructions, but that is only inferred. Since God isn't stated as having told her directly. Enoch was the first prophet for simply saying Jehovah had come to execute judgment and Ezekiel prophesied to the wind by just expressing to it God's command. Jesus was asked to prophecy who had struck him. (Jude 1:14-15; Ezekiel 37:9-10; Matthew 26:67; Luke 22:63-64)
Where does the Bible actually say that only a very few go to heaven to judge with Christ? Nowhere.The we there, in the mansions, were those people he was talking to. So, you have to figure out why. What is the practical reason? Jesus and Jehovah don't know sin. They aren't experienced with it. So, it wouldn't be fair for them to judge sinners. The people he was talking to do know sin, and they are our peers. A jury of our peers. They, a very few, go to heaven to judge with Christ.
John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven.What do you make of Jesus saying that no one has ascended to heaven except for himself, who had descended from heaven. That would include Adam.
No, I do not believe in the bodily resurrection of Jesus and I also don't believe there was ever any fruit in a garden.Resurrected? I can't remember, had you already said you didn't believe in the resurrection?
It says not to touch the fruit at Genesis 3:3.
You believe that Jesus plans to resurrect dead bodies from their graves? Then what do you believe will happen?Jesus' demonstration of resurrection was beneficial in that people would know that he could do that, because that is what he plans to do. (Hosea 13:14; 1 Corinthians 15:21)
But that was the whole point... It proves how great the Christian God is. .Jesus was supposedly stone, cold dead and came back to life. If it ain't true. If it didn't really happen, then Christianity is the biggest con job ever pulled on the people of the world.Like someone who is actually and truly dead in every sense of the word cannot be brought back to life.
I don't know that it is a con job.But that was the whole point... It proves how great the Christian God is. .Jesus was supposedly stone, cold dead and came back to life. If it ain't true. If it didn't really happen, then Christianity is the biggest con job ever pulled on the people of the world.