since hades was a myth long before the NT used it, does that mean hell is a myth???
Hades is death, grave, pit. . .which is not a myth.
also a physical place before the NT used it.
Yes, it was a physical place of continual burning, and a most fitting name to give hell.
Just as Coon is a most fitting name to give my dog because of the markings on his face which make his eyes look masked like my neighbor's pet coon, named Coon.
But because I
named him after Coon does not mean my
dog does not actually exist because he is not a
coon.
Likewise, just because Jesus
named hell after Gehenna, the perpetually burning city dump, does not mean
hell does not actually exist because it is not the perpetually burning
city dump.
might as well ad the jewish term sheol to the mix, now this was the original term of grave, or dirt pit.
We are dealing with
two languages here.
In
Greek,
hades is death, grave, pit.
In
Hebrew,
sheol is death, grave, pit.
Two different languages,
two different words, both meaning the
same thing. . .which is not a myth.
Now move forward to the NT, which was written in
Greek.
When Jesus gave a name to the place of
eternal fire, he used
Gehenna, naming it after the perpetually burning city dump.
It was not the city dump, it was simply
named after the city dump. . .like my dog is not a coon, he is simply
named after a coon.
like the pagens who incorporated previous myths into there religion it seems christianity did the same exact thing.
Hades and s
heol are not myths. They are death, grave, pit.
Nor is
Gehenna a myth. . .it is the city dump after which hell was
named in the
Greek.
Sheol, H
ades and
Gehenna are not myths. . .and never were.