Nope, as trying to establish the truth is why so many people are deluded in this world; it is far easier to establish what is false.Do you imagine Adyashanti's comment to be true?
So I've found that those statements add up in many places.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nope, as trying to establish the truth is why so many people are deluded in this world; it is far easier to establish what is false.Do you imagine Adyashanti's comment to be true?
In Buddhism when you are born you are born with "random" karma. You are not born with karma that you specifically racked up in a previous life but from a random accumulation of karma from the universe itself.
“Make no mistake about it – enlightenment is a destructive process. It has nothing to do with becoming better or being happier. Enlightenment is the crumbing away of untruth. It’s seeing through the façade of pretense. It’s the complete eradication of everything we imagine to be true”. - Adyashanti
True enough. So what?
Buddhism has a wide variety of different schools of thought. Some are mixed with others. This particular view comes from Theravadan Buddhism.See the first paragraph here: The Thirty-one Planes of Existence
There are many references in the Buddhist suttas to beings re-appearing in different realms according to their actions, ie kamma.
Buddhism has a wide variety of different schools of thought. Some are mixed with others. This particular view comes from Theravadan Buddhism.
So, if you're engaging in spiritual practices in order to achieve spiritual enlightenment, then you're engaging in mysticism.
Don't really feel like tracking it down since I learned this from Buddhists first hand rather than from sources. If they are wrong then perhaps by view of Buddhism is wrong but from a quick internet search it seems to support my claim that there is no unified way to look at the reincarnation process.I don't know of any Buddhist schools which teach your "random karma" interpretation.
Some English-speaking Buddhists prefer the term "rebirth" or "re-becoming" (Sanskrit: punarbhava; Pali: punabbhava) to "reincarnation" as they take the latter to imply a fixed entity that is reborn.[10] It is said to be the "evolving consciousness" (Pali: samvattanika viññana,M.1.256)[11][12] or "stream of consciousness" (Pali: viññana sotam, D.3.105) [13] that reincarnates. The early Buddhist texts make it clear that there is no permanent consciousness that moves from life to life.[14] The lack of a fixed self does not mean lack of continuity. In the same way that a flame is transferred from one candle to another, there is a conditioned relationship between one life and the next: they are neither identical nor completely distinct.
I'm only relaying how it was explained to me.@Midnight Rain : I may be mistaken, but it looks like you are trying to make rebirth fit into the reincarnation mold, thereby creating this perception of random karma.
there is no unified way to look at the reincarnation process.
I'm only relaying how it was explained to me.
I'm only relaying how it was explained to me.
In any case "random karma" is an oxymoron.
Consider 'yoga'. Some take it only as an exercise to clear the mind of clutter, so that they can concentrate on some problem. That is not mysticism.So, if you're engaging in spiritual practices in order to achieve spiritual enlightenment, then you're engaging in mysticism.
I sought answers to my questions by meditation to clear the mind and then thinking. Found them. Do not need meditation or any other process now. Would you term it as spiritual enlightenment. I think just 'enlightenment' (knowing, understanding) is enough to describe it, since I do not believe in spirits.Are you seeking spiritual enlightenment?
Consider 'yoga'. Some take it only as an exercise to clear the mind of clutter, so that they can concentrate on some problem. That is not mysticism.
I sought answers to my questions by meditation to clear the mind and then thinking. Found them. Do not need meditation or any other process now. Would you term it as spiritual enlightenment. I think just 'enlightenment' (knowing, understanding) is enough to describe it, since I do not believe in spirits.
If you deny the reality of spirit
So how do you understand "spirit" here?
I would define spiritually enlightened as a higher state of consciousness.
OK, higher states of consciousness can be accessed in meditation for example, but how is that dependent on "spirit".
Earlier you said: "If you deny the reality of spirit, then you cannot be spiritually enlightened." That's why I asked for clarification.