I have reported your post.Your absolute BS is duly noted.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have reported your post.Your absolute BS is duly noted.
I think most people who feel this way do so because they find spiritual truth and wisdom within their interpretation of the text.Why do people believe that the New Testament is authoritative? For example, what does "inspired by God" mean? Why do you believe that it is inspired by God.
This is not from an atheist perspective. I believe in God.
I believe that the New Testament has some objective truths. I also believe that it contains many artificial stories intended to serve a purpose.
Fine. You started the BS by making a personal attack.I have reported your post.
Jesus was sure Scripture is the Word of God - John 17:17 - and taught that, and explained that, and lived that
...................................The Bible is a collection of writings about God -- the Trinity -- .....
Yes, writings about God, but No Triune-Trinity god, Trinity is a man-made concept outside of Scripture just taught as ScriptureThe only way to understand and accept the Bible is through faith.
What do you mean by " truths"?Why do people believe that the New Testament is authoritative? For example, what does "inspired by God" mean? Why do you believe that it is inspired by God.
This is not from an atheist perspective. I believe in God.
I believe that the New Testament has some objective truths. I also believe that it contains many artificial stories intended to serve a purpose.
Only by those who didn't note utility ofYour absolute BS is duly noted.
Paul of the phony snake storyWhat Jesus lacked in recognized authority with the Jews was compensated for by the person of Paul; the Christian Bible is Paul's theology. I suspect that even the Gospels were written by Paul's assistants.
Your statement about the trinity is nothing more than your opinion. I and others clearly see the Trinity in Scripture. If you disagree, then explain this verse: “When the Advocate [The Holy Spirit] comes, whom I [Jesus] will send to you from the Father [God]—the [Holy] Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father [The Holy Spirit]—he [The Holy Spirit] will testify about me [Jesus].Yes, writings about God, but No Triune-Trinity god, Trinity is a man-made concept outside of Scripture just taught as Scripture
Please notice that Earth can't contain God - 1st Kings 8:27,49
God had No beginning according to Psalm 90:2
Whereas pre-human Jesus was "IN" the beginning but Never "before" the beginning as his God is
Even the resurrected ascended-to-heaven Jesus still thinks he has a God over him as per Revelation 3:12
Jesus understood and accepted Scripture, Not through 'blind faith' (credulity) but Jesus used logical reasoning on the OT explaining and expounding Scripture for us
You are going on the assumption that the words attributed to Jesus are actually his.Jesus was sure Scripture is the Word of God - John 17:17 - and taught that, and explained that, and lived that
Mankind's l-o-n-g history has proven that man has dominated man to man's injury, man's hurt - Ecclesiastes 8:9
Thus, people who think man can bring Peace on Earth they are in for a BIG surprise - 1st Thess. 5:2-3
Man is Not headed to Peace but to the coming great tribulation of Rev. 7:14
Jesus forewarned us so that we can be forearmed, but the world will Not listen
If you think that they're not, then whose words are they?You are going on the assumption that the words attributed to Jesus are actually his.
Any early Christian's. Are the words of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas really his? Most orthodox Christians would say 'no.'If you think that they're not, then whose words are they?
Religious institutions create and then declare their various scriptures to be the foundation of their authority.Why do people believe that the New Testament is authoritative? For example, what does "inspired by God" mean? Why do you believe that it is inspired by God.
This is not from an atheist perspective. I believe in God.
I believe that the New Testament has some objective truths. I also believe that it contains many artificial stories intended to serve a purpose.
Thank you for your replyYour statement about the trinity is nothing more than your opinion. I and others clearly see the Trinity in Scripture. If you disagree, then explain this verse: “When the Advocate [The Holy Spirit] comes, whom I [Jesus] will send to you from the Father [God]—the [Holy] Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father [The Holy Spirit]—he [The Holy Spirit] will testify about me [Jesus].
The Holy Spirit is mentioned four times. Jesus sends Him from God (the Father) to His disciples to testify about Him.
Of course, the Gospel of Thomas is not in the Protestant New Testament, as it is not considered conanical. So you are correct by saying that "most orthodox Christians would say no".Any early Christian's. Are the words of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas really his? Most orthodox Christians would say 'no.'
Because Christians early on had different collections of the sayings of Jesus. Only some of those became part of the Catholic and Protestant canons. Who gets to decide which sayings are authentic?Of course, the Gospel of Thomas is not in the Protestant New Testament, as it is not considered conanical. So you are correct by saying that "most orthodox Christians would say no".
C'mon. Seriously.Thank you for your reply
I notice you called God's spirit (Psalm 104:30) as ' The ' Holy Spirit
We speak of God's spirit as a 'The' but we do Not speak of The God or The Jesus
At Numbers 11:17,25 God's spirit is a genderless "it"
Greek grammar rules allow for a neuter to be in a gender
Even in English we speak of a car or a ship as a 'she' but we know then remain a neuter "it"
At Luke 11:13 and Luke 11:20 God's spirit is spoken of as being holy and also as being the finger of God - Exodus 31:18; Matt. 12:28
So, yes, God's spirit (it) can be sent out to help us, comfort us and so forth
In general it's because of tradition relating to the selection of the Christian canon. The rational argument is that texts which are consistent with the prophetic context are likely to be meaningful.Why do people believe that the New Testament is authoritative?
While that's true for institutions which follow the doctrine of sola scripture, there's a difference between the written word which relates to a testament and the spoken word which is meaningful for the living.Religious institutions create and then declare their various scriptures to be the foundation of their authority.
Which is why the Gospel of Thomas is not in the bible.Any early Christian's. Are the words of Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas really his? Most orthodox Christians would say 'no.'
I think you meant 'not in'. Testaments are the written will of the deceased, not the living.Which is why the Gospel of Thomas is in the bible.