But she wouldn't meet your definition.A women who had a hysterectomy is still a women. Its not complex.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But she wouldn't meet your definition.A women who had a hysterectomy is still a women. Its not complex.
Only thick headed quibblers would think that. Plenty of women have hysterectomy's without dressing up and pretending to be men.But she wouldn't meet your definition.
Amazing how people can spend so much time on the difference between sex and gender but can't explain the difference between male and female. I have NO PROBLEM with a person in a female body saying she "identifies as male" or "feels like a male" or some other words. My problem is with someone in a female body saying she IS male. The person in the photo above is NOT a male. She is a female with small breasts and a beard. And I have a problem with someone competing in female sports when he has male organs tucked in his tutu. Yes he IS his gonads regardless of what his brain tells him. This should not be treated as a medical problem with the physical body but as a mental problem in the brain.A trans man didn’t become a man after being born a woman. The brain had male drivers installed in female hardware. The person was always male, because we are not our gonads.
What about someone in a body with a uterus saying that he is a man? Or do we need to keep explaining the difference between sex and gender to you?My problem is with someone in a female body saying she IS male.
Destroying simplistic definitions can touch a nerve.Only thick headed quibblers would think that.
If you see a person on the street who lives in a two room shack but tells people he lives in a million dollar mansion, would you think there is a problem with his house or his thinking process? If a person with a uterus says she is a male would you think there is a problem with her body or her thinking process? Why is there a difference?What about someone in a body with a uterus saying that he is a man? Or do we need to keep explaining the difference between sex and gender to you?
Maybe you idea of realityNemo’s dad would have become Nemo’s mom in reality.
Intersex conditions are as common as red hair, and trans and non-binary people exist, so it's harder than you're assuming.XX chromosomes. Ova. Etc.
This is not really a hard question.
The sad reflection on the US is that her understanding of what "woman" means could very well have implications for Supreme Court rulings and Americans' legal rights.It seems fairly clear that it was a trick question intended to solicit controversy and appeal to a specific audience.
I would ask a SCOTUS nominee about things relating to, say, her interpretation of the First or Second Amendment, not about her personal definition of a woman.
If we don't know how to define what a "woman" or "female" is.... is Kamala Harris really the first woman/female VP?
What criteria gives her that title?
Imagine if tomorrow morning Trump declared that he is the woman Donalda, and has always been a woman, and was thus the first woman President.
Then "suddenly" the nonconformist would be struck by a common sense stick!Imagine if tomorrow morning Trump declared that he is the woman Donalda, and has always been a woman, and was thus the first woman President.
Of course it would be a mental problem. But why can someone else live years as a man and then one day say he is really a woman and no one says it is a mental problem. They rush to change his body instead of changing his brain.If he did it would be dismissed as he has mental problems.
I am happy to answer your questions, but I won't bother if I don't think you are actually engaging in a fair conversation. You replied without answering me. The ball is in your court.If you see a person on the street who lives in a two room shack but tells people he lives in a million dollar mansion, would you think there is a problem with his house or his thinking process? If a person with a uterus says she is a male would you think there is a problem with her body or her thinking process? Why is there a difference?
There is no "suddenly say". I agree that it's a "mental problem",Of course it would be a mental problem. But why can someone else live years as a man and then one day say he is really a woman and no one says it is a mental problem. They rush to change his body instead of changing his brain.
But "she" is disqualified in your definition.You said she? Sounds right.
I can't help but notice that Caitlyn Jenner, who, when she ran as Bruce in the 1970s was also knows as the "world's greatest Athlete," said this:There is no "suddenly say". I agree that it's a "mental problem",
but to call it that isn't PC. Nonetheless, it is a real condition,
ie, a brain with one sexual orientation in the body of the opposite
orientation. Changing the brain has yet to be shown a solution.
Let's avoid treating trans-genderism as a fancy or whim.
Where is it really an issue needing formal regulation?
Sports competition is the big one. If a trans-woman is
physically still a male, but merely on hormone treatment
for a year or so, that is unfair to cis-women. So while
she might be living as a woman, & planning on full
transition, her sport status should differ from social status.
How do you determine that it is a mental problem, and not a body problem?There is no "suddenly say". I agree that it's a "mental problem",
but to call it that isn't PC. Nonetheless, it is a real condition,
ie, a brain with one sexual orientation in the body of the opposite
orientation. Changing the brain has yet to be shown a solution.
It could perhaps be viewed either way.How do you determine that it is a mental problem, and not a body problem?
Only thick headed quibblers would think that. Plenty of women have hysterectomy's without dressing up and pretending to be men.