We must believe the CIA because the CIA is God whereas Russia is manure.Meanwhile leaders in Washington said the attack was "unprovoked." Yeah, no crap.
So whatever GOD says, is holy and true. Amen.
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We must believe the CIA because the CIA is God whereas Russia is manure.Meanwhile leaders in Washington said the attack was "unprovoked." Yeah, no crap.
Yup, and since all the facts support that, that makes sense. I mean, at this point, you're just muddying the waters so that no truth or facts can be believed.Meanwhile leaders in Washington said the attack was "unprovoked." Yeah, no crap.
Which have all been tried. Putin wants this war. He's getting exactly what he wants.Actually there are peaceful instruments to promote peace: sanctions, diplomacy, agreements.
Because Russia won't stop its invasion.Sending weapons to Ukraine will bring more war. More dead people.
No one is seeking peace through weaponry. Russia invaded Ukraine. Ukraine is fighting back so they don't get destroyed or taken over. Peace would be Russia stopping their invasion. Failing that, Ukraine will continue to fight, and other countries will continue to support them.Seeking peace through weaponry is like trying to sweeten a cake by adding salt.
The Berlin Wall fell in 1989.
I don't understand why American people who have never been to Europe claim to know what's going on in Europe.
The most important thing is to send theThe difference is that one bear has nukes. The other only has the non-nuclear weapons our tax dollars are buying for them (and we are only giving them enough to have a stalemate). I hope everyone understands that Ukraine will NEVER get all of their land back. Not saying that is right or just, just that Russia has lost too much to back down. IMHO.
Says Putin's pawn.Ukraine is just a pawn.
No doubt it was catastrophic. The transition was rough on the population because there was no plan in place, the situation was chaotic. The ruling classes took possession of the factories, workers weren't getting paid. One can only imagine how catastrophic it was. I'm glad I didn't have to go through that, there is enough problems in my own country on a regular basis without there being a total upheaval. To read into that and to say Putin wants to go back to the old system, I don't know if that is what he meant, because I have read that he does not want that.Putin said the worst catastrophe of the 20th century was the demise of the Soviet Union, so that plus his actions should tell you what he's trying to do and why.
Right.
But lately I have seen that Russia would be a much more loyal partner than other NATO members.
Who stabs other member states in the back.
Didn't you read Hillary's emails?
Gaddafi was killed because he was creating a new currency meant to liberate Western Africa from CFA Franc.
I still have long term memory.
Destroying Libya has signified to stab Italy in the back.
Why?
Are you trying to pretend as if whatever a member of NATO does is automagically done in the name of NATO?One question: is the United States a privileged member of the NATO?
Or the law is equal for all, in the NATO?
NATO was in Libya by UN MandateThis thread is not about Putin.
What the NATO did in Libya is unforgivable. And this because of gold-hunger. Gold owned by Gaddafi.
You are in a whole new crazy conspiracy territory here.The ones who paid him are not the American Government, of course.
It deals with shady banking élites who have nothing to do with FDR or the Congress. They are so sneaky, that they have the gift of invisibility.
So he declared war on the US Government. Not on those élites.
Not so much a "push" as it was a "pull".Seeing what nato did to Libya, now Ukraine is paying that price. It has been well understood for decades by those paying attention that nato's push eastern would result in Ukraine being where the bloodbath takes place. Nato has now formed a Pacific alliance and wants to go to war with China, Taiwan will pay that price.
This is a nonsensical statement.Let's not forget that MOST European countries have done nothing to favor peace between Ukraine and Russia.
Are you under the impression that anything there is calling for aggression against China?Defense, right.
Sweden Calls on NATO to Focus on China to Placate Trump
Sweden Calls on NATO to Focus on China to Placate Trump | The Libertarian Institute
Sweden is calling on the alliance to shift some of its attention to China. Stockholm argues this will align the bloc more with former US President Donald Trump’s policies.
On Tuesday, Swedish Foreign Minister Tobias Billstrom explained that the alliance should reorient some of its military assets towards Asia to confront Beijing. “If you want your partner to think about the things you think are a problem, you have to show commitment to their problems, and the American people are more concerned with the threat that China poses than Russia, for obvious reasons,” he explained. Billstrom added the bloc will keep fighting Russia in Ukraine but China “should also be recognized as part of NATO’s concerns, [and] headache.”
NATO is a war treaty forever looking for a war.
Why don't you like my solution?
I think it is logical that being an European, I have much more in common with Russia, than with America.
Because you are into facism?So I think it's normal that I trust the Russian propaganda, because it's something that makes sense to me, culturally and anthropologically.
My Russian speaking Ukrainian cleaning lady from Donbas that fled the country when the Russian aggressor invaded, along with literally everybody she knew there, heavily disagrees.So Donbas is a Russian-speaking region that wants to stay in the Russian Federation.
No.The Donbas people were being bombed and massacred.
A better question imo, which seems to be completely ignored by all pro-russian muppets here, is why those countries in the east were / are so desperate to join in the first place.Why wouldn't NATO allow countries in Eastern Europe in anyway, if they wanted to join?
Yeah, just like sending allied armies to Normandy in 1944 brought more war and dead people.Actually there are peaceful instruments to promote peace: sanctions, diplomacy, agreements.
Sending weapons to Ukraine will bring more war. More dead people.
Seeking peace through weaponry is like trying to sweeten a cake by adding salt.