Archives look big.I must have posted it tens of times...
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive
wikileaks.org
Excerpt the relevant passage.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Archives look big.I must have posted it tens of times...
WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive
wikileaks.org
Archives look big.
Excerpt the relevant passage.
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05785522 Date: 01/07/2016
Sarkozy's decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozy's plans are driven by the following issues: a.A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production, b. Increase French influence in North Africa , c.Improve his internal political situation in France, d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world, e.Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi's long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in,Francophone Africa. )
Who has ever mentioned USA?The above post (which won't work using the quote
function) addresses France, not US agendas.
You mention it regularly.Who has ever mentioned USA?
Your excerpt doesn't your support your claim.France is in the NATO...and the other NATO members aided her.
I don't care about Hillary's opinionated emails.Did you read Hillary's email where it's written that Gaddafi had to go because he was creating a new gold-based currency that would have undone the CFA Franc seigniorage in Western Africa?
He would have demolished the usurocracy in those African countries.
This thread is about the NATO.You mention it regularly.
Your excerpt doesn't your support your claim.
This thread is about the NATO.
The NATO contributed to the Libya's destruction and that email explains why. Period.
It's no mystery that USA adores France... so ...
It doesn't matter who decided this.False.
Security Council resolution 1973.
NATO led the campaign on the ground. NATO didn't "decide" this. The UN security council did.
Bashing France is the #1 sport in USA.It's no mystery that USA adores France... so ...
It doesn't matter who decided this.
Hillary's email explain the reason why they decided this.
Can I have my question answered on Hillary's email?
Is there the fifth amendment in Belgium too...right?
Certainly not Putin.So Russia was in on it too as a member of the security council.
I am not speaking of commoners who have been victimized by the stateless élites for centuries.Bashing France is the #1 sport in USA.
Certainly not Putin.
But other Russians were in on it.
This thread is about the NATO. It's you guys who keep bringing up Russia. Not me.This is not about Putin. Please stop posting in this thread as you have violated the rules of the thread.
BTW evidence for your claim, please.
Your favorite invisible boogeyman.I am not speaking of commoners who have been victimized by the stateless élites for centuries.
I am speaking of the élites.
Good lord, yes, you asked a specific person specific questions about any countries that use a universal healthcare system. That's not something only one specific person can answer. It's a broad topic that, unless you were asking an expert on the subject, is open to anyone.
I responded to your questions, but yet again, they're very broad and don't have easy, simple answers. It's like asking "What do Americans believe in?". You'd need to get a lot more specific if you want specific answers.
This thread is about the NATO. It's you guys who keep bringing up Russia. Not me.
It's useless you guys do that. Russia is a saint compared to the NATO.
1) I can find a lot of things. Your questions weren't specific enough to "find graphs". There are graphs for more specific information, though.OMG. Interesting how I can find graphs but you apparently cannot.
Because I WAS asking one poster about their experiences. I did find the answers to my questions after a bit though. On various graphs.1) I can find a lot of things. Your questions weren't specific enough to "find graphs". There are graphs for more specific information, though.
2) I gave you some information about Italy.
3) If you could find the info you wanted, why didn't you just do that? Why post very general vague questions and then insist you were asking one poster about their personal experience?