YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
It only became theirs after they had stolen it.I thought they took back what was theirs.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It only became theirs after they had stolen it.I thought they took back what was theirs.
With Muhammad, it was always all about the booty.The merch wasn't that of the Muslims.
Religion is a particular system of faith. Faith is a complete trust in something. Europeans have a complete trust in democracy.
It only became theirs after they had stolen it.
Is there a reason why Muslims are hellbent on bringing 9/11 conspiracy theories into everything? You know what? Even if Islamic terrorists didn't do it and it was entirely the fault of the US Government / The Jews / The CIA / A plastic spoon, who cares? That doesn't mean Muhammad didn't raid caravans and start countless wars and that other Muslims haven't committed religious based acts of violence.
If your neighbour robbed your house, is it a valid response to rob your neighbour's house? Will a court rule in your favour?How did they stole it? Mecca pagans harassed Muslims, drove them out of their houses, beat them and took their belongings. And, so Muhammad took it back.
How did they stole it? Mecca pagans harassed Muslims, drove them out of their houses, beat them and took their belongings. And, so Muhammad took it back.
If your neighbour robbed your house, is it a valid response to rob your neighbour's house? Will a court rule in your favour?
Have you never found it a bit odd that the Meccans would attack the Muslims, drive them out of the city, seize their property, then put it on a trade caravan and send that caravan past the city where the Muslim leader had established himself and his forces? That doesn't seem in the least bit odd to you?
It makes you just as immoral a person and it's not peaceful. The correct response is to tell someone in authority, in a modern society, and not retaliate with a kangaroo court.If a bully takes your lunch at school and the next day you take it back from him. What's wrong with that?
It makes you just as immoral a person and it's not peaceful. The correct response is to tell someone in authority, in a modern society, and not retaliate with a kangaroo court.
There were leaders in Muhammad's day who I'm sure people could have gone to. Or he could have gone back to the Meccans and asked for their stuff returned? There was no need for violence.Was there a court system back then? Was Arabia united back then? I thought Muhammad united Arabia.
There were leaders in Muhammad's day who I'm sure people could have gone to. Or he could have gone back to the Meccans and asked for their stuff returned? There was no need for violence.
Wasn't Arabia made of tribes? Didn't Muhammad united those tribes as one nation?
Yes, and? There were Elders in the tribe and Chiefs who could have been called on for help. The Muslims could have levelled a fine on the Meccans in recompense for their belongings, as was also common back then.Wasn't Arabia made of tribes? Didn't Muhammad united those tribes as one nation?
There is no such thing as a religion of peace; none of them. Not even Buddhism.
Yes, and? There were Elders in the tribe and Chiefs who could have been called on for help. The Muslims could have levelled a fine on the Meccans in recompense for their belongings, as was also common back then.
Doesn't make it right. And definitely not peaceful.You prob. don't understand how we boys do things. If someones punches us, we will punch back.