Yes, but often that definitive objective is power itself. The idea being that with all the power, everything else (including great richness) becomes secondary.
History suggest that one who only seeks power, often turns to violence and tyranny, but that wasn't the case with Mohamed.
He just wanted to turn people into believers,
for example: it makes no sense that a man spends most of the night praying and worshiping God, only to grant power over his people.
It flows perfectly, but I will make it even clearer still. (Read carefully, ok.)
You state that you would expect "god" to write another HOLY BOOK that refutes the Qur'an if in fact the Qur'an was the mere words of Muhammed. Your supposition is that "god" would never stay silent and let Muhammed get away with the whole thing. That is categorically false. There is absolutely no reason why "god" would have to refute Muhammed other than by your say so.
Wrong, if u believe in God, then u must believe God is fair, his fairness requires that he refutes false declarations in his name, so that people don't go astray...you will probably mention other religions and why God didn't react...i would say that Abrahamic religions provide adequate refutability against other religions.
Are you saying I do not trust Muhammed? Or God? Be very careful with your reply on this one, my young friend.
I have read two complete English translations of the Qur'an with the supporting commentaries. You have to understand one thing, I did not have the slightest problem understanding what I was reading. You are correct, as it was all too clear. The text of the Qur'an itself was enough to convince me that in no way could this possibly come from "god". Reading about the life of Muhammed further convinced me that he was in no way a genuine prophet of god regardless of what his followers seemed to think.
are you saying u trust Mohamed:areyoucra ...How do you trust Mohamed and don't believe in his message..plz enlighten me on that..and oh, remember i need to 'read carefully'
I didn't answer because it was an absurd question. Why dignify absurdity with a response? Just because you expect "god" to do it, doesn't mean that I am foolish enough to take the bait.
Still no answer:no:
It might come as a shock to you notso Right_Path, but I do believe in "god". The thing is, the god I know is absolutely nothing like how Allah is endlessly described.
Please tell us about the 'god u know'.
Quite personally and without malice, I consider Islam's vision of god to be quite primitive. It is about what I would expect from a group of people who existed 1400 years ago.
Do you judge people's perception to God according to the age they lived in?
And there are 1.8 billion who follow the trend of ''this group from 1400 years ago'', and yet live very happily.
O' make up your mind. First you are rattling on about eyes and since that wasn't terribly effective, you switch to the argument that ran out of gas long before I ever met you. Try harder.
I did not 'switch', i gave an example to make it easier for u to understand my viewpoint...it didnt work for u?...fine...it works for billions of people who believe in the creator.
You try harder, try to convince that God did not create your eyes...when something is subject to controversy, i would go for the one who claimed to be its creator, rather than your 'just worked' principle.
*Falls off chair - laughing*
You really don't have to do that my 'mature' friend
anyways i hope u r fine after falling off the chair!
finally, i want u to know i am not trying to beat u in order to prove myself right, i am only trying to convinve u with something..if you are not at all ready to listen...lets knock it off.
