You've done this?
We all have. But no normal human has perfectly. The amount of unchanging bliss and love experienced is determined by the level of our spiritual progress.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You've done this?
It's been said, the brain is an electromagnetic "computer" sitting in a bath of chemicals. If so, all mental states are dependent on "drugs" like adrenaline or oxytocin.
Are we talking in this discussion about naturally occurring chemicals or those ingested for effect?
I'm talking about naturally occurring chemicals.
We all have. But no normal human has perfectly. The amount of unchanging bliss and love experienced is determined by the level of our spiritual progress.
I guess I have a poor memory then, because I can't remember having done it. But I'm happy for you.
No, no I think you're misunderstanding me or I'm wording things poorly. Even our limited fleeting moments of genuine happiness and feelings of brotherly love are what I meant. Perfect unchanging happiness and bliss are a long way down the road for most of us.
What spiritual goal, if any, is served by modest dress? Or is there some other purpose to modest dress than to serve a spiritual goal?
Oxytocin isn't a drug or intoxicant; it's a naturally occurring hormone. It's associated with bliss, love, calmness, and romantic pair-bonding. The emotions you describe sound very much in line with the effects of oxytocin.No it doesn't come from any drugs or intoxicants.
It comes from stilling the mind and allowing the real Self (which is beyond the mind) to be experienced. The real Self is unchanging bliss and love experienced irregardless of material circumstances.
Incorrect. I'm talking about being in a relaxed yet heightened state of deep thoughts and complex emotions. Contemplation, empathetic connection, etc.Sounds like your talking more about adrenaline highs than spiritual highs.
exercising the sences leads to attatchment to the bodily platform , the hightened conciousness atained through pleasurable sensations is merely self gratification and has little to do with spiritual conciousness .
sex and music lead to emotional highs , pleasurable sesations , and attatchment to the body , the sensations of hightened conciousness is not a conciousness relating to the spirit , .....these highs pertain to the physical body .
where music is of a spiritual nature it lifts the spirit above the bodily platform , it is a form of meditation which trancends , rises above , that is not a high .
So music can be spiritual, but not sex? Sex can be far more than mere gratification.
The experiencing sensations (taste; food, hearing; music, sight; art, touch; sex, etc.) heightens the mind, depriving the mind dulls it. Experiencing life is far more spiritual than abstaining from it.
Incorrect. I'm talking about being in a relaxed yet heightened state of deep thoughts and complex emotions. Contemplation, empathetic connection, etc.
What you describe is still a physical high with peaks and valleys and not what is considered a deep constant spiritual state in eastern thought
My position is in line with Ratikala's previous posts.
As you're coming from an agnostic worldview you probably aren't concerned with higher undisturbable states beyond the mental and emotional level that we can taste before full enlightenment (Nirvana/Brahman/Oneness/etc.).
Former Buddhist here. *raises hand*
I once did deep meditation and experienced quite a few things myself. Actually, not just once. Nearly 18 years of it.
FH isn't too far off, though, when we take the descriptors away from what seems magical and mystical.
dear mystic sangha ,
what happened , or didnt happen , that made you give it up for '' the trampolines of love'' ?
but still you prefer the ups and downs of the material world ?
sorry I dont understand .... '' the descriptors'' ? ...... magical and mystical ?
There was a series of realizations that I simply could not reconcile with key Buddhist concepts. My journey from Buddhism was different from leaving Christianity because I never had (and still don't have) any animosity toward my former practice and belief system.
Where I part ways the most is how I stil find much of Buddhism to be patriarchal and homophobic. Western Buddhism may be forming its own culture, but there were still many teachings that continued to either act as apologetics for misogyny or for homophobia.
I acknowledge the world.
To not arouse passions in others. The passions are the root to much evil.
Originally Posted by Sunstone
What spiritual goal, if any, is served by modest dress? Or is there some other purpose to modest dress than to serve a spiritual goal?
but still you prefer the ups and downs of the material world ?
Patriarchal and homophobic? That includes all of human society (religious and secular) until very modern times.
So did Buddha step 1.