rational experiences
Veteran Member
A false prophet is a mathematical probability that was based on an Earth One God seal breaking reactive cause. Science caused it, so it was not natural.Is that what Baha'u'llah thinks of people in the other religions? Assemblage of false ones? Their beliefs he sees as "superstitions"? I think it is. I think he doesn't believe one religion, except his, has true beliefs and true religious practices. I think that he believes all religions, except his, is wrong. And I've asked Baha'is many times... when did Christianity ever teach a "true" message about God? Once their beliefs got written down they were already wrong. They believed God spoke from heaven. That Jesus rose from the dead. That Jesus spoke with Satan etc. How do you think later Christians could come up with true doctrines and beliefs when they were based on the things written about God and Jesus in the NT?
Science bases its own identity upon false probability, for the Sun only attacked and converted Earth once.
Then science who quotes in his male thesis I tried to emulate the Earth history of a one of event...the Earth however as that natural body did not own that event, a one of any more. So it was natural law or natural advice about copying reactive conditions for a scientists lying mentality.
It was a cause and effect of the body One, Earth as God and stone being forced to un naturally, not naturally changed. Yet science quotes "the body is natural".
Hence argument was literally about word usage and words were misappropriated in the sciences.
Such as one obvious statement. The gift of life, is present, current and obviously right here and right now.
Although a medical biological genetic thesis was inferred by C given 100 life span observed past genetic defective reasons. As proof, 100 years was in the past, life is dead.
If you therefore from a modern day observation point quote Jesus died at the Age of 33, then Jesus did not live for the normal life span, future event from a human baby to an adult deceased 100 year life span.
So they did a Genetic/human appraisal as proof that occult science did it, as an evil minded, theist bad life choice. To apply a non natural condition as artificial reasoning. What was not occurring in natural actually.
As a human would quote in teaching, we live owning a 100 year life span from a newly born baby life. Yet if all life is destroyed today, the present is where you live.
So a science theist would quote, life is instant, an instantly placed life, as a sperm, as an ovary, as a baby, as a child, as a teenager, as a young adult, as an old adult to your human death, instant for everyone. Yet then you would reason why everyone of varying ages were living variations. To quote self is instantly made manifest, without manifesting.
As old science quotes are read as if science said instant manifestation like some false theism does today, old science was not making that quote. It was a teaching to say tomorrow is not promised to anyone if science takes the present/the gift of life away today.
The teaching said, Immaculate heavens cold clear balances out day light burning gas mass that radiating life can only survive within, ages and dies. So said the reason why we die is due to the Immaculate gases having been light sacrificed, by their burning. That comment is not a scientific thesis of relativity.
It was human HOLY SEE observations by self quoting, life is instantly just here...even though an adult is making that teaching quote...they knew that were born from sex, and had been the baby growing self, but was making a human adult observation quote.
Why I wonder today when a scientist tries to convince anyone that we are a hologram that built up by the reasoning of G O D and then G O O D, as a quote that GOD built us.
When historically they built a falsified God machine and pretended it was God the Earth, reacted it and lost their natural mind/psyche to subliminal interference by the alienation or AI effect, being an occult realisation and teaching.
That science then possessed all of their thoughts and made them illogical thinkers.
In human reality, the explanation why modern science stopped quoting male and female God/Goddesses terms, for it was scientific relativity for conversion. They quoted One planet O one God as a theme....and only one self x 2 equals.
How it was rationally taught, the theme never said and 1 = 2 as if One equalled the presence of 2. Irrational thinking not using nor quoting the psyche conscious explanation of word usage correctly.
As an irradiated mind brain I have had a lot of forum users quote, have you got a problem speaking English correctly. Yes I told them I was irradiated in a form of stigmata attack. The same individuals are the writers of the bible actually same unnatural expressions to their best explanation, but not correct word usage or natural conscious explanation.
That needed a reader to add into correct conscious reasoning. What I have been trying to get you to realise. Of course the bible is not the book of life....we are living the life naturally without any book writer.