chinu
chinu
Ok. may be some other time with fresh mind.OK. Let's leave it then.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ok. may be some other time with fresh mind.OK. Let's leave it then.
It can be a compelling possibility for atheists. But, NOT for theists. Theist doesn’t require any compelling possibility after being a theist.
Neither theists compel atheists to become theist, nor they have any purpose behind being theist.
Just assessment. Not honest-assessment.They just are theists because that's their honest assessment with no agenda. Got it.
Does atheist have just assessment, or honest assessment ?Atheists have an honest assessment as well. No agenda.
Belief though is not knowledge as certain as one can be about it. It's not the same as knowing the objects in your house.
I understand belief to be not knowing.
I suppose a lot of certainty passes for knowledge. I'm convinced that happens as well.
Where in the agenda in there?But, you said NO agenda. Then what is this you are talking about ?
Just assessment. Not honest-assessment.
No agenda, No room for word “honest”
Does atheist have just assessment, or honest assessment ?
Anyways, you can copy the same for atheists if you like to.
But, you said NO agenda. Then what is this you are talking about ?
And, moreover there's NO purpose behind believing in something that cannot be proven true. People unnecessarily dishonor theists.
To criticize religion is not necessarily to dishonor it.People unnecessarily dishonor theists.
Trouble for many believers is judging erroneously that non believers are no good.
No this is NOT a trouble. In fact, its a natural process. A theist him/herself too went through this natural process before turning into a theist.Trouble for some atheists is denying things like free will and self accountability and things like science as truth without question.
For a true theist there's NEVER theism vs atheism. Rather its just a journey from atheism -to- theism. Its a natural process. And, a true theist respect this natural process, and as well as the time taken to complete this journey.. as a will of God.Getting caught up in theism vs. atheism could distract us all from greater problems.
Friend, this thread is about criticizing WITHOUT an invitation.To criticize religion is not necessarily to dishonor it.
Friend, no assumptions pleaseFor example, if parts of it don't make sense, what's wrong with saying so?
Was stopped before becoming.Where in the agenda in there?
I don't know what that sentence means.Was stopped before becoming.
Means, agenda was stopped before happened.I don't know what that sentence means.
Ah me, I do my best not to assume, and only to put forward reasoned critiques based on facts, but you're right ─ that would never work with theology.riend, no assumptions please
Ah me, I do my best not to assume, and only to put forward reasoned critiques based on facts, but you're right ─ that would never work with theology.
Not even if it's true? They say love is blind, so maybe something like that is relevant, though the idea's not necessarily flattering.from that very moment onward "Theist" itself is the evidence of the existence of "God". Further, no room for any fact for the non-existence of "God" can be welcomed by that person.
Not even if it's true? They say love is blind, so maybe something like that is relevant, though the idea's not necessarily flattering.
That alone invalidates it.... after that study complete, No doubts left behind. No more study required further. Study ends.
No need to prove.That alone invalidates it.
Theists obviously disagree with you.No need to prove.
I don't need to. Theists clearly have their own reasons for attempting to prove their beliefs. Go ask them.Can you give any good purpose to a theist so that he/she may prove ?