Villager
Active Member
Then why did he bother?To me Jesus is referring to the inner I AM that resides in everyone.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Then why did he bother?To me Jesus is referring to the inner I AM that resides in everyone.
Then why did he bother?
To me Jesus is referring to the inner I AM that resides in everyone. It does not mean to literally worship him to reach the Father.
Why did he use such cryptic language? Like the parables, to guide the subconscious mind toward awakening.
Also a lot of Christ message has been corrupted over the years by evangelicals that want to worship a man and not God. The beauty of Christs message steel bleeds through to those that want it.
There's another way to take the quote, too: rather than looking at it as "none of those non-Christian paths can lead to Heaven because they don't have Christ in them", you can look at it as "any path that leads to Heaven has Christ in it, even if it's not officially 'Christian'."I understand the general concept associated with this quote is that only people who believe in Christ can reach Heaven. But what I don't understand is why the literal interpretation? Does one need to believe Christ is literally the son of God in order to reach Heaven, or does one simply need to believe in His teachings?
Why did he bother at all? If it is true that "I am" means "You are," the whole subject becomes absurd, and one might as well discuss Buddhism or football.Why did he use such cryptic language?
To be saved, a person surrenders control of his or her life, in every aspect, to Christ, and to no-one else, because no-one else is nearly good enough. This is in gratitude for the substitutionary death of Christ that saves from guilt and eternal punishment. So the old person must 'die' to allow the 'new creature' to live. There is no way round that, though there are thousands of attempts at escape routes to get round it.There's another way to take the quote, too: rather than looking at it as "none of those non-Christian paths can lead to Heaven because they don't have Christ in them", you can look at it as "any path that leads to Heaven has Christ in it, even if it's not officially 'Christian'."
"Nobody gets to the Father except through Me" implies "If you have come to the Father, you have come through Me."
And here I was thinking "I am" was a correlation to the OT when God said to Moses, 'I AM WHO I AM"
Jesus said I am several times.
I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me shall not hunger. John 6:35
I am the gate; if anyone enters through Me, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture. John 10:9
I am the good shepherd; the good shepherd lays down His life for His sheep. John 10:11
I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in Me shall live even if he dies. John 11:25
I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but through Me. John 14:6
I am the true vine, and My Father is the vinedresser. John 15:1 [/I]
Truly, Truly, I say to you, before Abraham was born, I am, John 8:58
Interesting how many of them tend to be saying the same thing - that it is through Christ's sinless life, death and resurrection which we are saved and allowed into heaven. Therefore, we are only able to come to the Father through Christ, meaning the relationship God originally wanted to have with us, that was broken by sin can only be restored through believing in Jesus and his work on the cross.
Why did he bother at all? If it is true that "I am" means "You are," the whole subject becomes absurd, and one might as well discuss Buddhism or football.
That's preposterous to any who have read a gospel.To share the message.
The rule of God in the personal life of each one grateful for salvation.
So called by pagans. This prayer is outdated. It was for people living before the crucifixion, not after it.
Someone read my post!
With wailing and gnashing of teeth, anyway.
They make no sense to those who see no reason to find their lives unsatisfactory. But Jesus did not come for those people. The love of Jesus is only for those who find their lives unsatisfactory, and wish to gain a clear conscience.Your comments about my post makes no sense.
They make no sense to those who see no reason to find their lives unsatisfactory. But Jesus did not come for those people. The love of Jesus is only for those who find their lives unsatisfactory, and wish to gain a clear conscience.
So what is to be done with those who see fit to differ?Jesus isnt for anyone.
So what is to be done with those who see fit to differ?
Or is factually incorrect, and find that it gets corrected.Well you can write a post that doesnt make sense.
Or is factually incorrect, and find that it gets corrected.
Or whatever you want. Makes no diff to me. You havent made sense yet.
That's preposterous to any who have read a gospel.