Colt
Well-Known Member
Alls we have from the times of Jesus are the Gospels and the spirit of truth.The only way to discredit them is to point out there's no recorded history of them.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Alls we have from the times of Jesus are the Gospels and the spirit of truth.The only way to discredit them is to point out there's no recorded history of them.
Even his contemporaries rejected him. The gospels began with collections of his sayings and interviews with eye witnesses. The Apostle John dictated his gospel. Luke interviewed eye witnesses. Mark was a first hand account.Role of eyewitnesses[edit]
The majority of New Testament scholars agree that the Gospels do not contain eyewitness accounts;[53] instead, the four were written in and for various Christian communities for the purpose of proclamation, and as a result they present the theologies of their communities rather than the testimony of eyewitnesses.[54]
Historical reliability of the Gospels - Wikipedia
Regards
Role of eyewitnesses[edit]
The majority of New Testament scholars agree that the Gospels do not contain eyewitness accounts
I believe that all of the Bible prophecies that refer to (a) the Coming of the Messiah and (b) the return of Christ have been fulfilled by the Coming of Baha'u'llah and what He did on His Mission.Maybe, but the Bible's track record is pretty poor at this point with not a single prophecy fulfilled yet.
Or to find the bones of Jesus proving that He never rose from the dead. NOTHING could make me happier.The only way to discredit them is to point out there's no recorded history of them.
Who do you believe was the spirit of truth?Alls we have from the times of Jesus are the Gospels and the spirit of truth.
Supported unconditionally yet live by conditions.Who do you believe was the spirit of truth?
The spirit of truth is Jesus and among us now.Who do you believe was the spirit of truth?
In my opinion the Quran and writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad also present their theologies and not eyewitness accounts to Jesus life, but I bet you can't even see the problem.Role of eyewitnesses[edit]
The majority of New Testament scholars agree that the Gospels do not contain eyewitness accounts;[53] instead, the four were written in and for various Christian communities for the purpose of proclamation, and as a result they present the theologies of their communities rather than the testimony of eyewitnesses.[54]
Historical reliability of the Gospels - Wikipedia
Regards
Life sacrificed attacked human teaching is the topic Jesus. A human spiritual advice. Suffering itself to give conscious advice that Phi used for mass God conversions caused life to be attacked by man using technology.The spirit of truth is Jesus and among us now.
The translation from Chinese to English isn’t working.Life sacrificed attacked human teaching is the topic Jesus. A human spiritual advice. Suffering itself to give conscious advice that Phi used for mass God conversions caused life to be attacked by man using technology.
The exact same advice as before in Jesus and before that advice in Moses.
Science thesis by Phi then applied change due to Phi thinking first then using. Science.
Teaching man invented his own sin. Science state
I do not believe that Jesus is the Spirit of Truth, since Jesus promised the Spirit of Truth would come later and guide us into all truth. Jesus did not do what the Spirit of Truth was slated to do because as Jesus said, we could not bear the many things back in His day.The spirit of truth is Jesus and among us now.
I'm not Chinese. Never spoke Chinese have no understanding Chinese.The translation from Chinese to English isn’t working.
All 4 Gospels were anonymous documents later named after the disciples to add some credulity to them for the credulous (sinful) Pauline-Christians, I understand, please. Right?Even his contemporaries rejected him. The gospels began with collections of his sayings and interviews with eye witnesses. The Apostle John dictated his gospel. Luke interviewed eye witnesses. Mark was a first hand account.
When Jesus returned to the spirit world he could then pour out the spirit of truth upon all flesh as he said he would. That spirit came on Pentecost.I do not believe that Jesus is the Spirit of Truth, since Jesus promised the Spirit of Truth would come later and guide us into all truth. Jesus did not do what the Spirit of Truth was slated to do because as Jesus said, we could not bear the many things back in His day.
John 16:12-13 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
Moreover, Jesus cannot be the Spirit of Truth because Jesus referred to the Spirit of Truth as a separate individual..
John 16:14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
What is the source from the first century that says the 4 gospels originally had no names?All 4 Gospels were anonymous documents later named after the disciples to add some credulity to them for the credulous (sinful) Pauline-Christians, I understand, please. Right?
"The four canonical gospels were probably written between AD 66 and 110.[9][10][11] All four were anonymous (the modern names were added in the 2nd century), almost certainly none were by eyewitnesses, and all are the end-products of long oral and written transmission.[12] Mark was the first to be written, using a variety of sources;[13][14] the authors of Matthew and Luke, acting independently, used Mark for their narrative of Jesus's career, "
Gospel - Wikipedia
Right?
Regards
Regards
What “theme” are you needing to discredit?
The Church teaching is that the Comforter and Spirit of truth are the Holy Spirit that was sent to the disciples at Pentecost, but that makes no sense, because the disciples did not do all of the following things that it says the Comforter and Spirit of truth will do in these verses: John 14:26; John 15:26; John 16:8,13,14When Jesus returned to the spirit world he could then pour out the spirit of truth upon all flesh as he said he would. That spirit came on Pentecost.
You are simply cutting and pasting from wiki without providing the source of who was present in the first century to collaborate your claim."Gospel[note 1] originally meant the Christian message, but in the 2nd century it came to be used also for the books in which the message was set out;[2] in this sense a gospel can be defined as a loose-knit, episodic narrative of the words and deeds of Jesus of Nazareth, culminating in his trial and death"
Gospel - Wikipedia
"Jesus cursed death on the Cross" (that never happened) is (an important aspect of ) the theme of the 4 Gospels, I understand. It is a misstatement of the 4 Gospels, I figure, as they were not eye-witnesses of the event, never. Right?
Regards