• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

When was "the Messiah" first mentioned in scripture?

Colt

Well-Known Member
There is another way to look at it. Because the historical jesus didn't write anything he set events in motion for whatever his real intent was to be misunderstood and to not meet the standards that Yeshayahu wrote about when he stated:

View attachment 70718

Thus, it pays for Torath Mosheh Jews to stick to what Yeshayahu stated.
Moses predates the finalization of the Torah in Babylon by 1000+ years. It's unlikely that Moses even spoke Hebrew. And those tablets that God supposedly wrote on with his own finger (not the first set that Moses smashed after he got back to camp) rather the second set, those are nowhere to be found! You accept what your religion gives you, hook, line and sinker! ;) I'm acknowledging that scripture books get edited and redacted, that they aren't perfect. Sometimes things are speculation and conjecture, sometimes holy men misremember stuff. Its simply part of the religious world.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
Really. Which type of Aramaic and where did you get your information that the Greek gospels are translations of from an Aramaic text? Also, what is the name of the persons/people who did the translating?



Actually, it is bit more nuanced than what you wrote. The claim is that the historical jesus was not what is found in the NT writings. I.e. there was a historical person who inspired the jesus mythos and there is the jesus mythos run wild.

In terms of getting rid of jesus. Christians have him so his legend has not been gotten rid of. Besiders, according to what you wrote earlier the whole thing was not for Torath Mosheh Jews anyway, it was for non-Jewish pagans. Further, the NT it makes it clear that the early Christians wanted out of the Torah based Jewish community.

In terms of live and let live, because I am not trying to convince or convert and simply answering your question from the OP it is 100% live and let live. Is it possible that you were never asking a question at all but making a statement or a manifesto? ;)
I didn't say that there was an "Aramaic text", I said that Aramaic was the common language in Israel at the times of Jesus. So, anything he said would have to have been translated into Greek upon the writing of the Greek Gospels.

There is enough of Jesus in the Gospels to change the Western world. His spiritual presence is alive and well.

My questions are sincere, Christians and Jews differ on what constitutes references to the Messiah. I actually reject some of what Christians have twisted and contorted into proof texts.
 

101G

Well-Known Member
I believe the "sons of God" who mated with the "daughters of men" were distinct individuals from heaven that had taken on human form as servants of the "Prince of this world" loooong before Adam arrived.
First thanks for the reply, but ERROR on your part. angels do not preocrate, for there is no blood in or from heaven. so that shut the door on any heavenly decent, here on earth. the term "son of God is earthly exclusive, meaning to men, (males or females), example Job was a son of God, see Job 1:2
In my theology life was created through the process of evolution.
Good that's your belief, 101G's is adaptation through MICRO-Changes, and not Macro-changes, which God clearly states in Genesis chapter 1.
Humans are roughly 1,000,000 years old.
no one really knows but God. not even the Earth itself via the rocks knows.
The "crafty beast" was the original representative of God on earth.
we disagree with that assessment. Man was here from creation day 3 before any plant life, or animal life, respectively.
He was a Son of God who eventually joined the Lucifer rebellion which caused terrible havoc on earth
again, we disagree. man was disfellowshipped with God..... (dead to God) , but not in relationship. did you understood what 101G just said? Adam had fallen from GRACE with God but his relationship with God was enacted. that was the deception on the serpent part, and is the same today.
The disloyal staff members mated with the daughters of men in order to perpetuate their cause after loosing immortality
Again, ERROR on your part. there is no disloyal staff members ..... in or from heaven.

please understand, not one holy angel of God fell or left heaven.

101G
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
First thanks for the reply, but ERROR on your part. angels do not preocrate, for there is no blood in or from heaven. so that shut the door on any heavenly decent, here on earth. the term "son of God is earthly exclusive, meaning to men, (males or females), example Job was a son of God, see Job 1:2

Good that's your belief, 101G's is adaptation through MICRO-Changes, and not Macro-changes, which God clearly states in Genesis chapter 1.

no one really knows but God. not even the Earth itself via the rocks knows.

we disagree with that assessment. Man was here from creation day 3 before any plant life, or animal life, respectively.

again, we disagree. man was disfellowshipped with God..... (dead to God) , but not in relationship. did you understood what 101G just said? Adam had fallen from GRACE with God but his relationship with God was enacted. that was the deception on the serpent part, and is the same today.

Again, ERROR on your part. there is no disloyal staff members ..... in or from heaven.

please understand, not one holy angel of God fell or left heaven.

101G
IMOP Celestial beings that take on the human form such as Jesus can and have procreated.

The ideological war or rebellion began in heaven in the celestial world and spilled over onto earth and the administration of humans.


Revelation 12:7-17
King James Version

7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
 

101G

Well-Known Member
@dybmh,
Greeting my brother. I would for you to confirm or not something for me the term "Shiloh"
is it, "Shiloh", actually two Hebrew words together meaning, Lamb that Joined?

get back with me on this ok.

101G.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
let's take this one at a time.

#1. do angels have blood? yes or no.

your reponse.

101G
No, but I believe that there are different types of angels as well as celestial beings/sons of God. Jesus for instance was a spiritual being who took on the form of a human. He most certainly bleed! The "sons of God" who mated with the daughters of men were celestial beings in human bodies.
 

101G

Well-Known Member
while we Waite on #1.

#2. "Revelation 12:7-17"
Just because a vision is shown in heaven. (the third Heaven), do not mean it took place in the 3rd heaven.

start at verse 4 to set the context.
Revelation 12:4 "And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born”.
The main key here is the word, “tail”, and “of “, as in “of” heaven, and not in heaven, about the stars. stars here is symbolic of men who hold God's written word. stars do not necessary , or automatically means angels. in this verse it means men. those on earth that had heavenly information, or a message from God, that’s the symbolization used here of, heavenly stars. revelation chapter 12 correspond to the birth of Christ to a tee. Matthews chapter 2 tells how Herod the king tried to kill the baby, the Christ. it say that the dragon drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and cast them to earth, this is not a persuasion to follow the dragon, but an attempt by the dragon, (king herod), to use someone to gain heavenly knowledge. it said that his tail “DREW” the THIRD part of the stars of heaven. drew here, means, "to gather together". so who did king Herod drew, or gathered together? it's the stars or messengers that is (of heaven), that’s on earth, with the heavenly knowledge of where the babe is to be born at. (I'll show this by scripture, later). Herod the king called/drew, or gathered together unto him his aids, to find out about the new born King, that the wise men came to worship. he wanted to know where the child was born at, so that he may kill the babe, (he stood ready to kill/devour, the child). as said, the word drew, past tense, mean to gather, or draw together. king Herod inquired of the men of God, (Heavenly messengers, or Godly men, the stars), as to where the babe was born at. lets pick up the account, and see what the "THIRD PART" that he drew with his tail. Matt 2:4 "And when he had gathered all the chief priests,(1 part), and scribes, (2 part), of the people together, (there it is, of the people, not angels in heaven). he demanded of them where Christ should be born". these men was of God, who should know the things of God, and they did. scripture, Matt 2:5 "And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet, 6 And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel". Now lets get the third part, the wise men. Matthews 2:7 “ Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, (3rd Part), enquired of them diligently what time the star appeared”. There is the third part, or the third of stars, the wise men. the scriptures said that the dragon, drew a third part, “of”, the stars, “of”, heaven. There you have it, a third part of the STARS. lets recap, Matthews 2:4, 1/3 the chief priests, 2/3 the scribes, and the 3/3 the wise men.
see how the wisdom of God work to bring out the correct information. only Lucifer fell, (not physically), but as Adam did in the Garden, no more presenting himself before the Lord, orther words as the scriptures states, his place was found no more in heaven, (as Adam present was not no more in the Garden). and this exile of satan was not at chapter 12 here in Revelation, but we will see in chapter 11 of the two witness. Satan fall, scripture, Isaiah 14:12 " How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! verse 13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, (STOP IF HE WAS TO ASEND INTO HEAVEN THEN HE WAS NOT FROM HEAVEN). I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: verse 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. verse 15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit”.
so, not one holy angels in heaven fell, but Lucifer only, which was before. as the Lord Jesus said in Luke 10:18 "And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven." lighting here is symbolic for ... "quick", because physical lighting is only for a few seconds.
let God word prove without a doubt that these stars here in chapter 12 are men. Jude1:12 "These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, (there they are), to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever". these stars .... wondering, are false prophets and teachers, ect...... Human men. a reading of the whole chapter will revealed who they are. But lets see them in a few verses. Jude verse 4 "For there are certain “men” crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ”. now verse 11, these same men are describe again, "Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core". so these "stars" are men, on earth, and not angels in heaven.
“and the dragon stood before the woman ready to devoue”. Matthews 2:8 “ And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also”. The word devour here is to kill. scripture: Matt 2:16 "Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men". So we see the real dragon being represented/ or is symbolic in the person of king Herod. And the woman, symbolic of the church in the wilderness, (Judah). And the child born is the male child the Christ, the HEAD of the church, the chief cornerstone. and the 3rd of stars was 1 the chief priest, 2 scribes, and 3 the wise men, the THREE PARTS.
So no holy angels fell from heaven, not here, nor satan, because he's not from heaven.


Revelation 12:7 "And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels”.
Not a war in the third heaven, the habitation of God, or the seat of the angels and glorified saints, NO, there is no discord and contentions there, nothing but peace, love, and joy. but in the church, and outside, below, here on EARTH, which contain some militant, and has in it as it were a company of two armies, the Good the bad, and and along with the ugly on the sidelines. heaven here is on the earth, where the sky/heaven is. that which was the heaven of Satan, the god of this world, or the prince of the “AIR”/ heaven. our sky, and this war refers not to the dispute between Michael the archangel and the devil about the body of Moses, or any such. no, but with principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world. the name "Michael" is symbolically here for the Lord Jesus, for the Name Michael means "LIKE GOD". and this "WAR" is spiritual. Ephesians 6:10 "Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Verse 11 "Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. Verse 12 "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Verse 13 "Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Verse 14 "Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; verse 15 "And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; verse 16 "Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. Verse 17 "And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: verse 18 "Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints”.
Lets see it clearly. “Michael and his angels fought against the dragon”. the name Michael, as said, here, is NOT meaning a created angel, with whom his name does not agree, it signifying "who is as or like God". the name Michael means “Like God” and Jesus is our God. our Lord goes to battle for his people. Supportive scripture, Isaiah 42:13 "The LORD shall go forth as a mighty man, he shall stir up jealousy like a man of war: he shall cry, yea, roar; he shall prevail against his enemies”. now see Rev 19:11-16, he the TRUE Gospel, who is TRUTH. the warfare is spiritual in Nature, for the sin sick souls.
and his battle, it is not yours, nor mine, but the Lord's, and it is his to win, scripture, 2 Chronicles 20:15 "And he said, Hearken ye, all Judah, and ye inhabitants of Jerusalem, and thou king Jehoshaphat, Thus saith the LORD unto you, Be not afraid nor dismayed by reason of this great multitude; for the battle is not yours, but God's. verse 16 "To morrow go ye down against them: behold, they come up by the cliff of Ziz; and ye shall find them at the end of the brook, before the wilderness of Jeruel. 17 "Ye shall not need to fight in this battle: set yourselves, stand ye still, and see the salvation of the LORD with you, O Judah and Jerusalem: fear not, nor be dismayed; to morrow go out against them: for the LORD will be with you".
We are to STAND in the Lord, and watch the Lord fight for us, he is able to deliever.
so the war is not in Heaven, but here on the battleground ... EARTH.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
while we Waite on #1.

#2. "Revelation 12:7-17"
Just because a vision is shown in heaven. (the third Heaven), do not mean it took place in the 3rd heaven.

start at verse 4 to set the context.
Revelation 12:4 "And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born”.
The main key here is the word, “tail”, and “of “, as in “of” heaven, and not in heaven, about the stars. stars here is symbolic of men who hold God's written word. stars do not necessary , or automatically means angels. in this verse it means men. those on earth that had heavenly information, or a message from God, that’s the symbolization used here of, heavenly stars. revelation chapter 12 correspond to the birth of Christ to a tee. Matthews chapter 2 tells how Herod the king tried to kill the baby, the Christ. it say that the dragon drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and cast them to earth, this is not a persuasion to follow the dragon, but an attempt by the dragon, (king herod), to use someone to gain heavenly knowledge. it said that his tail “DREW” the THIRD part of the stars of heaven. drew here, means, "to gather together". so who did king Herod drew, or gathered together? it's the stars or messengers that is (of heaven), that’s on earth, with the heavenly knowledge of where the babe is to be born at. (I'll show this by scripture, later). Herod the king called/drew, or gathered together unto him his aids, to find out about the new born King, that the wise men came to worship. he wanted to know where the child was born at, so that he may kill the babe, (he stood ready to kill/devour, the child). as said, the word drew, past tense, mean to gather, or draw together. king Herod inquired of the men of God, (Heavenly messengers, or Godly men, the stars), as to where the babe was born at. lets pick up the account, and see what the "THIRD PART" that he drew with his tail. Matt 2:4 "And when he had gathered all the chief priests,(1 part), and scribes, (2 part), of the people together, (there it is, of the people, not angels in heaven). he demanded of them where Christ should be born". these men was of God, who should know the things of God, and they did. scripture, Matt 2:5 "And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet, 6 And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel". Now lets get the third part, the wise men. Matthews 2:7 “ Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, (3rd Part), enquired of them diligently what time the star appeared”. There is the third part, or the third of stars, the wise men. the scriptures said that the dragon, drew a third part, “of”, the stars, “of”, heaven. There you have it, a third part of the STARS. lets recap, Matthews 2:4, 1/3 the chief priests, 2/3 the scribes, and the 3/3 the wise men.
see how the wisdom of God work to bring out the correct information. only Lucifer fell, (not physically), but as Adam did in the Garden, no more presenting himself before the Lord, orther words as the scriptures states, his place was found no more in heaven, (as Adam present was not no more in the Garden). and this exile of satan was not at chapter 12 here in Revelation, but we will see in chapter 11 of the two witness. Satan fall, scripture, Isaiah 14:12 " How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! verse 13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, (STOP IF HE WAS TO ASEND INTO HEAVEN THEN HE WAS NOT FROM HEAVEN). I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: verse 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. verse 15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit”.
so, not one holy angels in heaven fell, but Lucifer only, which was before. as the Lord Jesus said in Luke 10:18 "And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven." lighting here is symbolic for ... "quick", because physical lighting is only for a few seconds.
let God word prove without a doubt that these stars here in chapter 12 are men. Jude1:12 "These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots; Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, (there they are), to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever". these stars .... wondering, are false prophets and teachers, ect...... Human men. a reading of the whole chapter will revealed who they are. But lets see them in a few verses. Jude verse 4 "For there are certain “men” crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ”. now verse 11, these same men are describe again, "Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core". so these "stars" are men, on earth, and not angels in heaven.
“and the dragon stood before the woman ready to devoue”. Matthews 2:8 “ And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also”. The word devour here is to kill. scripture: Matt 2:16 "Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men". So we see the real dragon being represented/ or is symbolic in the person of king Herod. And the woman, symbolic of the church in the wilderness, (Judah). And the child born is the male child the Christ, the HEAD of the church, the chief cornerstone. and the 3rd of stars was 1 the chief priest, 2 scribes, and 3 the wise men, the THREE PARTS.
So no holy angels fell from heaven, not here, nor satan, because he's not from heaven.


Revelation 12:7 "And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels”.
Not a war in the third heaven, the habitation of God, or the seat of the angels and glorified saints, NO, there is no discord and contentions there, nothing but peace, love, and joy. but in the church, and outside, below, here on EARTH, which contain some militant, and has in it as it were a company of two armies, the Good the bad, and and along with the ugly on the sidelines. heaven here is on the earth, where the sky/heaven is. that which was the heaven of Satan, the god of this world, or the prince of the “AIR”/ heaven. our sky, and this war refers not to the dispute between Michael the archangel and the devil about the body of Moses, or any such. no, but with principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world. the name "Michael" is symbolically here for the Lord Jesus, for the Name Michael means "LIKE GOD". and this "WAR" is spiritual. Ephesians 6:10 "Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Verse 11 "Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. Verse 12 "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Verse 13 "Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Verse 14 "Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; verse 15 "And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; verse 16 "Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. Verse 17 "And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: verse 18 "Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints”.
Lets see it clearly. “Michael and his angels fought against the dragon”. the name Michael, as said, here, is NOT meaning a created angel, with whom his name does not agree, it signifying "who is as or like God". the name Michael means “Like God” and Jesus is our God. our Lord goes to battle for his people. Supportive scripture, Isaiah 42:13 "The LORD shall go forth as a mighty man, he shall stir up jealousy like a man of war: he shall cry, yea, roar; he shall prevail against his enemies”. now see Rev 19:11-16, he the TRUE Gospel, who is TRUTH. the warfare is spiritual in Nature, for the sin sick souls.
and his battle, it is not yours, nor mine, but the Lord's, and it is his to win, scripture, 2 Chronicles 20:15 "And he said, Hearken ye, all Judah, and ye inhabitants of Jerusalem, and thou king Jehoshaphat, Thus saith the LORD unto you, Be not afraid nor dismayed by reason of this great multitude; for the battle is not yours, but God's. verse 16 "To morrow go ye down against them: behold, they come up by the cliff of Ziz; and ye shall find them at the end of the brook, before the wilderness of Jeruel. 17 "Ye shall not need to fight in this battle: set yourselves, stand ye still, and see the salvation of the LORD with you, O Judah and Jerusalem: fear not, nor be dismayed; to morrow go out against them: for the LORD will be with you".
We are to STAND in the Lord, and watch the Lord fight for us, he is able to deliever.
so the war is not in Heaven, but here on the battleground ... EARTH.
In the heaven or realm where Michael lives, that's where Satan was also, that's where he sinned, that's where the rebellion began. I don't know what you mean by 3rd heaven.

This thread is about the scriptural references to the Messiah. You could start a thread about your beliefs about angels and such.
 

101G

Well-Known Member
No, but I believe that there are different types of angels as well as celestial beings/sons of God. Jesus for instance was a spiritual being who took on the form of a human. He most certainly bleed! The "sons of God" who mated with the daughters of men were celestial beings in human bodies.
No, is correct, angels have no blood, and in turn cannot produce human sperm.

God on the Other hand can just speak, and a child is conceived.
Jesus for instance was a spiritual being who took on the form of a human.
Yes, because he is God. and man is his, his, his, ... IMAGE ..... hello?

He most certainly bleed!
yes, because that was the purpose of ..... "REDEMPTION", and "SALVATION". and God himself is the MAKER of BLOOD.... Hello?
The "sons of God" who mated with the daughters of men were celestial beings in human bodies.
ERROR, the sons of God are HUMAN that mated with women, the daughter, of men. they were the offspring that was produce. in, in, in, the garden.

101G
 

101G

Well-Known Member
In the heaven or realm where Michael lives, that's where Satan was also,
ERROR, satan was on earth, with access to the third heaven, remember he said "I will ascend" well if he was already in heaven where Michael lives why asend?

101G.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
ERROR, satan was on earth, with access to the third heaven, remember he said "I will ascend" well if he was already in heaven where Michael lives why asend?

101G.
Satan was in heaven and on earth, he could go where he wanted.

The "sons of God" who mated with the "daughters of men" were distinct becuse they had come down from heaven and taken on the human form. This gave rise to the ancient legend of the Gods coming down to earth. They were far from God but much taller in stature.



Job 1:6-12
King James Version

6 Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them.

7 And the Lord said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the Lord, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.
 

Colt

Well-Known Member
No, is correct, angels have no blood, and in turn cannot produce human sperm.

God on the Other hand can just speak, and a child is conceived.

Yes, because he is God. and man is his, his, his, ... IMAGE ..... hello?


yes, because that was the purpose of ..... "REDEMPTION", and "SALVATION". and God himself is the MAKER of BLOOD.... Hello?

ERROR, the sons of God are HUMAN that mated with women, the daughter, of men. they were the offspring that was produce. in, in, in, the garden.

101G
Jesus is a Son of God who became the person of Mary's baby at conception. When old enough he could have had children but chose not to.

The point is that celestials can become human and have flesh and blood. Like Melchizedek.
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
@dybmh,
Greeting my brother. I would for you to confirm or not something for me the term "Shiloh"
is it, "Shiloh", actually two Hebrew words together meaning, Lamb that Joined?

get back with me on this ok.

101G.
If I understand, and you know my Hebrew is weak at times, that would be "seh-loh", not "Shiloh". The spelling would be way different, and the vowels would need to be ignored or changed. Basically, the only thing in shiloh which would be indicating a lamb is the first letter "ש". A person can have a lot of fun with this as I'm sure you can imagine.

"ש" could be a water-drawer. Could be a snail, Could be a a vow. Could be peace. Could be virtually anything.
 
Last edited:

101G

Well-Known Member
If I understand, and you know my Hebrew is weak at times, that would be "seh-loh", not "Shiloh". The spelling would be way different, and the vowels would need to be ignored or changed. Basically, the only thing in shiloh which would be indicating a lamb is the first letter "ש". A person can have a lot of fun with this as I'm sure you can imagine.
Thanks my brother, that's interesting, Lamb. if Jesus is the Lamb, that is Joined to God, then Abraham was correct in what he said. Genesis 22:8 "And Abraham said, My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together."
now, I will play a little bit. if the scripture would have said, "And Abraham said, My son, God will provide "FOR" himself a lamb for a burnt offering" them 101G would not have said anything, but in the way Abraham spoke caught my EAR. "God will provide himself a lamb"

this is exactly what God did, his ...... "OWN"/himself, ARM in flesh brought SALVATION into himself, read Isaiah 53:5 via Isaiah 63:5.

and the Lord Jesus is the Lamb of, of, of, of, God...... himself in flesh.

101G.
 

101G

Well-Known Member
Jesus is a Son of God who became the person of Mary's baby at conception.
ERROR, JESUS the person always existed. the Son of God, the flesh that was born was conceived in Mary, not Jesus the Son of Man ..... Know the difference.

101G
 

Ehav4Ever

Well-Known Member
For one there is NO mention in the Gospels themselves of Jesus writing anything except in the sand. No such statement exists in the Gospels. Everything in the so-called red letters were people writing about Jesus. Neither is there any account of the apostles or real-time followers taking dictation. Those early manuscripts vanished from history.

We can definately agree on these points.

I'm a student of the Urantia Book revelation of 1955. We have the entire story of Jesus as observed by celestial beings who were then present on earth.

Okay. Got it.
 

Ehav4Ever

Well-Known Member
I'm acknowledging that scripture books get edited and redacted, that they aren't perfect. Sometimes things are speculation and conjecture, sometimes holy men misremember stuff. Its simply part of the religious world.

So then we can agree that Torath Mosheh Jews should stay out of the NT editing and redacting of Christian scriptures and religion and leave that to the professionals - Christians.
 

Ehav4Ever

Well-Known Member
I didn't say that there was an "Aramaic text", I said that Aramaic was the common language in Israel at the times of Jesus. So, anything he said would have to have been translated into Greek upon the writing of the Greek Gospels.

Okay, so who did the translating? Also, was there a reason they preserved all of their Greek translations while writing nothing in Aramaic or at leas not preserving the Aramaic at the level they did with the Greek?

Also, according to your insight, which type of Aramaic were they translating from?

One voclaized like this:

smmj_68_pastedown.png


or that is vocalized like this?

hqdefault.jpg



I actually reject some of what Christians have twisted and contorted into proof texts.

Thumbs-up-Memes9.jpeg
 

Ehav4Ever

Well-Known Member
You accept what your religion gives you, hook, line and sinker!

Since I don't have a concept of religion I follow nothing with hooks, lines, or sinkers attached. The same way that you don't accept a religion hook, line, and sink. Similar to you I don't accept anyting. Similar to you I take a topic or issue and investigate it the using the scientific method. Then I revisit and retest it over and over again non-stop for years. If need be I go and learn a new language or travel to a new place to verify the facts.

I think we can both agree no one should accept anything that calls itself or styles itself as a religion. ;)
 
Top