• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Are You Not an Atheist?

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
Ok, but people do consider themselves as theist or atheist. I presume that individually they have their reasoning.

Of course. Although, when someone calls themselves an "atheist" or a "theist," behind the scenes they have a more specific construct thereof within their minds. They have ideas about what the word (or cultural equivalent of) "god" means when they call themselves that. I mean, I do. When I say I'm a theist, I certainly don't mean classical monotheism that comes to mind for most in my culture. I mean polytheism, which is pretty darned foreign to the contemporary way of thinking about theism. I typically have more in common ideologically with "atheists" than I do other "theists" in my culture.
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
I'm not trying to imply that there are no reason for being a theist.
And I think we've discussed often enough atheist's reason for being an atheist. However I'd be happy to explain for myself why.

I'm just curious what folks feel justifies their theism. What knowledge a person personally has to justify a belief in God.

I was brought up Catholic with a strong science education. I started out religious but as time went on the impact of my science education made me an Agnostic. After college, I became more of an atheist, since it was an easier path to follow. When morality is relative, you can get away with more things, and not feel your conscience. The low road was fun for many years.

Eventually being unnatural via relative morally, caused a backlash inside of me, where guilt started to appear. This guilt led me back to my roots as a science agnostic. This is someone who uses science to bridge the gap to spirituality.

What I learned is the human brain is evolving. Much of religion deals in symbolism, which has an impact on the brain's firmware and software. Mystical experiences begin in the brain, but are often easier to see and remember, if they are projected outward. Projection allows internal content to overlay sensory realty, to induce a stronger feedback potential.

As an example of projection, say someone had a social anxiety disorder. They get nervous in crowds of people. Even if everyone in a particular crowd was warm, friendly, and welcoming, their social anxiety will create a projection overlay, using the emotions of fear. This fear overlay can distort how they see these nice people in the real world. The feedback to their brain, is the sensory visuals of the people, but with a fear overlay, that is not in reality, but starts in the brain. The brain will process this distorted composite data. Mystical projection is similar, but it uses other types of projection overlays to get the brain to react a certain way. These are like command lines for the brain's computer language.

Atheism misses the boat in that it remains unconscious of these natural projection factors. The low road makes one less receptive. In my case I needed to go back and use my brain to get rid of the virus that had been culturally inserted, by being made unconscious on the low road.

A good example of a this on a larger scale is Revelations. This symbolism is analogous to the command lines for a major update in the operating system of a human brain. The final people who are left will be totally different.

If a new Windows operating system comes out, the installation process is destructive in terms of the un-install of the old system. The computer's hard drive needs to be purged and all traces removed. Revelation is a series of events where people come under a spell; projection. The projection is needed to push button for uninstall and install.

However, since it is a projection process that has roots in the brain, the update can theoretically be done, internally, without projection outward. Each person is a microcosm. However, it takes much longer due to loss of the sensory input overlay. However, like trying to install a new operating system that is buggy, the upgrade could end up with many bugs. The bible tells us not to add or change anything, or you will mess up your operating system. This can be fatal.
 
Last edited:

Audie

Veteran Member
It an obvious fact (and has been proven) that we are born with the predisposition to believe in some kind of God. I would add that atheist can’t provide an explanation for it.

People have had experiences that they “felt” them as real religious experiences

And there are at least some arguments for the existence of God, that have convinced some people (sure there are also arguments for atheism)

Well, if by "proven" you are referring to anything done
in the name of science, uh, no.
Still, I am pretty sure you are referring to something
that is an innate basis for the beliefs people have.

Just what that is all about, jury still out, probably.

points 2 and 3, well taken.
 

atanu

Member
Premium Member
I'm not trying to imply that there are no reason for being a theist.
And I think we've discussed often enough atheist's reason for being an atheist. However I'd be happy to explain for myself why.

I'm just curious what folks feel justifies their theism. What knowledge a person personally has to justify a belief in God.

I am neither a classical theist nor an atheist. But I was an atheist for about 42-43 years, believing body to be same as the "I" awareness. In 2001, my father died of cancer on my arms. I saw his restlessness and his ability to say "I" vanish. I realised that although the body lied on bed intact, glucose would not revive life and the body would not say "I". I asked my brother, who is a nuclear physicist, as to what physics says about the "I" awareness. My brother said "Physics does not pretend to know it since it is not within the scope of study of physics".

I felt that the "I" that was animating body of my father was also animating me, my wife, my children and all beings. Then teachings of Ramana Maharshi appeared in horizon. Shri Ramana Maharshi taught that enquiry into "Who Am I?" leads intellect to its source, which is infinite awareness. Further intellectual analysis of states of manifest consciousness in three states of waking, dreaming, and sleeping led me to an understanding that the Self is that which remains unchanged distinct from the three states, while illuminating the three states. Upanishads teach that the fourth is the Self that is Brahman, which appears to intellect as Lord-God. Meditation validates this intellectual understanding.

So, in my understanding, Brahman is the very Self (in all selves) that sees-knows-experiences. It is self -evident and self illumining. What light can you use to illumine sun, which is light itself?
 
Last edited:

osgart

Nothing my eye, Something for sure
I want to be a theist but i just aint.

Try as i may, existence is just too brutal.

I totally see the beauty of a god that has nothing to do with any of the religions out there.

I totally see the beauty of a god that has nothing to do with making this universe.

I am all for theism if it means to study the unknown god.

Dying is a rotten thing.

I cant figure out for the life of me why i have a soul, but i do. And for that reason i remain open to the idea of eternal living.
 

74x12

Well-Known Member
I'm not trying to imply that there are no reason for being a theist.
And I think we've discussed often enough atheist's reason for being an atheist. However I'd be happy to explain for myself why.

I'm just curious what folks feel justifies their theism. What knowledge a person personally has to justify a belief in God.
Feeling God's presence. His joy + love/kindness. Having prayers answered. Seeing God working and knowing the Word of God is alive for today. Not just yesterday. Not just the old scriptures but new for today and tomorrow and for all time. Knowing the truth deep inside, undeniable. The Anointing teaching. (1 John 2:27) But all of this is personal and inside me. And anyone can know God just the same as I do. So no, I'm not being "arrogant" as I've been accused of on this forum more than once. Just stating the truth as I know it. It's up to people whether they believe one person like me or not. :)

Also, knowing the truth. After years of learning and research I've come to know that not only is God very, extremely real. But so is Satan and his dark kingdom. That the world is ruled by evil forces and that God reigns in heaven. That He will soon return and end the dominion of darkness. All of this undeniable and I would be an utter fool to change my mind; having known what I know already. :p

In summary, I cannot be an atheist even if I wanted to. Which I don't. No offense to atheists. I mean no disrespect and am not implying arrogance or pretending I'm better, smarter, wiser than anyone else. :)
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
Of course. Although, when someone calls themselves an "atheist" or a "theist," behind the scenes they have a more specific construct thereof within their minds. They have ideas about what the word (or cultural equivalent of) "god" means when they call themselves that. I mean, I do. When I say I'm a theist, I certainly don't mean classical monotheism that comes to mind for most in my culture. I mean polytheism, which is pretty darned foreign to the contemporary way of thinking about theism. I typically have more in common ideologically with "atheists" than I do other "theists" in my culture.

Sure, a theist may have many differing concepts about the God or Gods they believe in. However when one calls themselves an atheist I'd assume they wouldn't themselves would have a set of concepts about any God they thought was real.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
I want to be a theist but i just aint.

Try as i may, existence is just too brutal.

I totally see the beauty of a god that has nothing to do with any of the religions out there.

I totally see the beauty of a god that has nothing to do with making this universe.

I am all for theism if it means to study the unknown god.

Dying is a rotten thing.

I cant figure out for the life of me why i have a soul, but i do. And for that reason i remain open to the idea of eternal living.

That's fine. Belief in a soul or eternal living doesn't require a belief in theism.
 

ajay0

Well-Known Member
And what is a "belief system"?

If you had a belief that there was some force, like
gravity, say, that is always there, and could kill you
or gravely injure you at more or less any moment.

How is this a belief system!!

I know that there is gravity, not believe in it. Similarly I know that the sun will rise in the east not just believe in it.
You believe when you don't know, and put theories and opinions to compensate for the ignorance.


And that whether you are conscious of it or not,
affects everything you do, at all times.

Elabourate rituals and philosophical constructs
deal with this force; you even post about it. :D

I post about the Self which is there within each human being , and which is translated as awareness or the 'I am' state. This is something which can be discerned by anyone within themselves.

Here is a sample.
 

leroy

Well-Known Member
Well, if by "proven" you are referring to anything done
in the name of science, uh, no.
Still, I am pretty sure you are referring to something
that is an innate basis for the beliefs people have.

Just what that is all about, jury still out, probably.

points 2 and 3, well taken.

Yes that is my point we have an innate basis for the belief in some kind of God or power. ¿do we disagree on something?
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
What is the sense of the divine?
A kind of unified super-life of some sort. Imagine a cell in your intestines. It doesn't know you and will never know you. However, because it is "made in your image", so to speak, it has this sense it is part of a greater life form. That's the only way I know how to describe it.

BTW, I'm not directly criticising your position, just stating where I am at.
I fully understand and accept it doesn't translate well to others. Maybe it's my medical training, but I accept that everyone has different perceptions and I shouldn't blame others for not feeling as I feel because there could be some anatomical reason for that. Many Christians blame the atheist for not feeling God, but when you ask, a lot of Christians don't believe God talks either, which is why they are forced to commit idolatry by fixating on the bible. The bible exists and God doesn't seem to, but the bible says He does, so they are freaking out in their minds. At least atheists have an understandable conclusion: they don't sense any type of deity, so they don't believe in one. It's simple and clear cut. I'm open to many conclusions about God's existence because "God" wanted me to learn about others and there are lots of different types of gods out there, from universe creators to inventor of some random human process or device. I no longer feel that "BibleGod" exists as stated, but I'm open to other ideas, like they did exist as human tribal leaders long since dead and we act in their memory or something, or that the universe is the body of a really REALLY big god or something, or whatever.

If we somehow discover it, test and verify it, would we even call it God?
It would depend on if we want to define it as such. There are lots of different types of gods, as seen above. Let's say there is no such thing as a universe creator, but gods can be guardians of some local thing, like a tree or a building or whatever. If you are testing such a god for creating a universe, you will conclude there is no god.

However what if it turns out to be other than what we expected?
We can have a nice laugh and a glass of wine and sigh about it for awhile before going to bed. :)

Also, I think life would be a cruel worthless joke if we were really brought into this world just to be given the final reward of achievement -Death!
But life could be the reward and death is simply the end credits.

But I hate death. So I must hate life because it leads to death.

...I don't want to die.
Ask God to turn you into a jellyfish?

They are kinda immortal. :)

What was it all for?
How does an afterlife give meaning to this life? How is reality affected by your afterlife options?

What kind of life is so cruel, that it advances so far that it comprehends It's own inevitable death. I don't think other animals have to deal with that. The dung beetle surely doesn't.
I would argue that any life form that tries to avoid death understands death.

If they didn't understand, why bother trying to avoid it?

But how does it feel to know that in about two generations after your death, you will be completely forgotten. All you've done, for absolutely nothing.
Ancient Egyptians believed in a fairly rich afterlife. Do you know who they are? Worse, like that movie Coco, they also believed if their memories were not kept up, they ceased to be or something. We don't know who most of them were, so ....

I was unfortunate enough to be with my mother the day before she died last month. She was in excruciating pain, suffering from pancreatic cancer. The day before she died, she told me she wasn't ready for the grave.
I'm sorry to hear that. I was with my grandfather the day he died. He insisted he accepted it and welcomed it. He was in severe pain from a torn aorta that the surgery apparently didn't fix. It was his time to go. As a nurse, it's sad and somewhat infuriating when acceptance hasn't been reached yet. I've seen too many people suffer horribly because either they or their families wanted an extension.

Regardless of popular beliefs, nobody wants to die. Even When They're suffering.
This is inaccurate. Some people welcome it.

It's going to suck really bad, and It's going to hurt.
Not after the nerves die.

I guess what I was getting at was that partially the reason for my belief in the supernatural is based on my contempt and frustrations with reality - the reality that I might die at a time when I won't want to.
Doesn't having Someone in charge of that make it worse? If I die because of old age or incurable sickness or whatever, my time was up. With a God in charge of my time, then it becomes His whim, which seems even MORE offensive.

.The cruelness of the natural world. I reject it. Like lions who attack weaker cubs. I reject it.
You don't eat?

If sane people are willing to die to testify the existence of God, then we should believe.
Jesus and the apostles were less than willing, or they wouldn't have run so many times. What now?

The Christianity God has a strong reason to hide behind because humans need to be saved by faith.
But it's abundantly clear that God is the "Decider", and can decide what to do with you regardless of what you say or do.

I was brought up Catholic with a strong science education. I started out religious but as time went on the impact of my science education made me an Agnostic. After college, I became more of an atheist, since it was an easier path to follow. When morality is relative, you can get away with more things, and not feel your conscience. The low road was fun for many years.
Please explain the drama in the Catholic (and admittedly, all the other ones too) church if atheism is the moral low road.

A good example of a this on a larger scale is Revelations. This symbolism is analogous to the command lines for a major update in the operating system of a human brain. The final people who are left will be totally different.
I had to crash my computer after an update totally made it unusable.

The bible tells us not to add or change anything, or you will mess up your operating system. This can be fatal.
You realize that's akin to the FBI copyright warning, right? The DVD player isn't going to kill you if you post a scene on youtube.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Yes that is my point we have an innate basis for the belief in some kind of God or power. ¿do we disagree on something?

Not really.
Not to make an invidious comparison but we also
have an innate basis for drug addiction.

What is the basis for the basis, that is what
is interesting, and I think, unknown.

As long as it is not presented as (the way some do)
a "see, proof of God, he made us with a ..."
then, no disagreement. You made good points.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
How is this a belief system!!

I know that there is gravity, not believe in it. Similarly I know that the sun will rise in the east not just believe in it.
You believe when you don't know, and put theories and opinions to compensate for the ignorance.

I post about the Self which is there within each human being , and which is translated as awareness or the 'I am' state. This is something which can be discerned by anyone within themselves.

Here is a sample.

How would I know what a "belief system" is? It is your
term. You tell me what a "system" is.

I said some force "like gravity". I did not mean gravity,
which I am sure you are in fact aware of gravity. But if
you dont want to see my idea, fine.


You believe when you don't know, and put theories and opinions to compensate for the ignorance.

The relevance of this comment, I dont know.
Esp as it is entirely made up nonsense, applies
in no way to me.

Your last five lines are unrelated, and I can make no
sense of them anyway.

So what is a "belief system"?
 

Audie

Veteran Member
In summary, I cannot be an atheist even if I wanted to. Which I don't. No offense to atheists. I mean no disrespect and am not implying arrogance or pretending I'm better, smarter, wiser than anyone else. :)

Well, there you go. Not being into self-deception, there
is not way I could believe in "God", esp of the Christian variety.
 

leroy

Well-Known Member
Not really.
Not to make an invidious comparison but we also
have an innate basis for drug addiction.

What is the basis for the basis, that is what
is interesting, and I think, unknown.

As long as it is not presented as (the way some do)
a "see, proof of God, he made us with a ..."
then, no disagreement. You made good points.
Well if God exists and he wills to create creatures that love him, why wouldn’t he create humans with the innate predisposition to believe in him?

If atheism is true, why would we have such an innate predisposition?
 
Last edited:

ajay0

Well-Known Member
You believe when you don't know, and put theories and opinions to compensate for the ignorance.

The relevance of this comment, I dont know.
Esp as it is entirely made up nonsense, applies
in no way to me.

This is what I meant. You had no idea what I stated, so you conveyed your opinion or belief that it is nonsense to cover up your ignorance of what it meant.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Well if God exists and he wills to create creatures that love him, why wouldn’t he create humans with the innate predisposition to believe in him.

If atheism is true, why would we have such an innate predisposition?

Why indeed, to the first, but we being so far less than
ants to such a god, the Love that he programmed into us
to have for him.... you know? An odd, weird really,
thing to want. Make tiny things in such a way that they
will "love" him?

On innate predisposition, did you see what I wrote?
Try again, svp. While you are at it, why the inante
predisposition to drug abuse? Violence?
 
Top