tumbleweed41
Resident Liberal Hippie
Any theocratic government tends to discourage proselytization of other theologies.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You want a country by country analysis, over 1400 years? Seriously?Which buildings have been destroyed,please sort actual events
Then how you explain the presence of the churches for christians hundreds of years ago under what you called the despotic islamic theocracies.
Though that is true, Islam does take this to a whole new level of intolerance.Any theocratic government tends to discourage proselytization of other theologies.
Is that supposed to make current atrocities more palatable? Like, honestly, Tumbleweed, you would have to go to undeveloped African countries, to find that today. Persecution of non-Muslims is almost a given in virtually all Islam dominated countries on the planet today. Sorry, but I'm not seeing the connection.Christian theocracies have not been known for their tolerance either.
You want a country by country analysis, over 1400 years? Seriously?
That said, it is very telling that you chose to ignore the point of making other religions beg to make repairs or to build new facilities. Very instructive.
Since you asked though, I should correct what I said. Destroying churches is not entirely accurate, though in a very real sense it IS VERY accurate. You see, as no doubt, you well know, Islam became quite famous for taking over the churches in areas it conquered, DESTROYING any signs of the former occupants and converting said building into mosques. In that sense, they MOST CERTAINLY "destroyed" the churches, though it is also true that they did not destroy the buildings themselves.
If destroying all signs of the former occupants and changing the very nature of a building from a church to a mosque is NOT "destroying churches", I'd be captivated to hear your explanation.
Is that supposed to make current atrocities more palatable? Like, honestly, Tumbleweed, you would have to go to undeveloped African countries, to find that today. Persecution of non-Muslims is almost a given in virtually all Islam dominated countries on the planet today. Sorry, but I'm not seeing the connection.
Would you offer two or three examples of countries that serve as positive role models?So you said undeveloped African countries,but that is not happening in other muslim countries.
This is such a drop dead easy point, that I will start with the somewhat "Islam friendly" website of Wikipedia.That is absolutalely not true,show us which churches that have been token over by
muslims through the history and that they were used as mosques,actually the mosque building is differ from the christian building,that is known to everyone.
Tell that to the Copts in EgyptSo you said undeveloped African countries,but that is not happening in other muslim countries.
The short answer is that to Muslims who believe that Islam is THE Supreme religion, not only on this planet, but that it is also the "religion of God", such efforts to "convert" Muslims or turn them away from the TRUE faith is an abomination. In some ways, it is seen as an act of mercy to stop such conversions, dead in their tracks, to minimize the insult to God and thus minimizing the sin incurred, by Christians, AGAINST God, to lessen the wrath of God against such misguided Christians.
This seems distastefully and conveniently entitled.That is tied to the above. Again, Islam is often seen as the Supreme religion, the religion OF GOD, it is therefore logical that there should be no impediment standing in the way of Muslims converting non-Muslims into the fold, as it were.
This is such a drop dead easy point, that I will start with the somewhat "Islam friendly" website of Wikipedia.
Conversion of non-Muslim places of worship into mosques - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Category:Mosques converted from churches in Istanbul - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Again, this is a well documented "feature" of Islamic conquests.
Tell that to the Copts in Egypt
Not at all. The current situation is reminiscent of past situations. Theocratic governments are notorious for persecuting others beliefs.Is that supposed to make current atrocities more palatable? Like, honestly, Tumbleweed, you would have to go to undeveloped African countries, to find that today. Persecution of non-Muslims is almost a given in virtually all Islam dominated countries on the planet today. Sorry, but I'm not seeing the connection.
Why CANT Christians openly try to convert Muslims in Muslim countries ?
but
Muslims CAN openly try to convert Christians in Christian countries ?
i mean the Quran does say there is no obligation in region right and claims to be the religion of peace
So? The Celtic Christians did the same in Ireland. What's your point?Under their rule, Muslims made Spain a center for learning and knowledge.
So you are as weak as your argument? It is noted however that you have chosen not to respond to the well documented practice of Muslim overlords requiring non-Muslims under their command to beg to fix their places of worship or beg to build new places of worship. Again, that, in and of itself, is telling.i always try to avoid such debates,but persons
such as yours forced me to engaged in such useless arguements.
Much like we see in all democratic republics on the planet... No, wait... that doesn't sound right... Hmmmm.... It's coming to me...ANYWHERE that religion (or political ideology, for that matter) gains a dominance, even unofficial, there will be attempts to silence other viewpoints.
So you are as weak as your argument? It is noted however that you have chosen not to respond to the well documented practice of Muslim overlords requiring non-Muslims under their command to beg to fix their places of worship or beg to build new places of worship. Again, that, in and of itself, is telling.