Curious George
Veteran Member
I happen to be board and restless, why else would I be discussing that which as already been discussed in this very thread-not to mention umpteen other threads on this forum.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What happened to Job's friends again?
You seem to be pretty hung up on AIDS. Is your argument, then, increased AIDS risk makes homosexuality wrong?
I never heard anything like that.
If it's true, it's coincidence.
.
Hmmm, I don't think your taking this very seriously answering that way. Aids kills people, it was first seen in homosexual men. Is this wrong? You don't seem to want to answer.
It's a false analogy right from the get-go.Let me ask you this as an analogy:
Let us say that a group of people start a game where you shoot at one another.
But if you insist with the analogy, using real guns would be the equivalent to engaging in unprotected sex, and paint-balling would be practicing safe sex.This is only between consenting adults, so its fine right? The fact that there will be millions spent on trying to put us together then, we shall ignore. Occasionally there will be a few innocent bystanders that will be hit, but what the heck, eh. This gets taken up world wide; people shooting people and millions spent on it. For some reason though, no one is allowed to say it is wrong in the press. I wonder why? Perhaps its because its not the people killing, just that little bit of lead which enters them. Would this be allowed? No. It would be seen as irresponsible. Why not go paint-balling instead, without the consequences which would normally follow.
Took a quick looksie. It is, indeed, correct that it was first observed in homosexual men.
However, homosexual behavior has existed pretty much since forever, and has been observed among other animals.
So, again, homosexuality has nothing to do with it, and the fact that it was first observed in homosexual men is mere coincidence. Despite what you hear in detective movies, coincidences (or at least the work of mischievous Elves) DO exist.
It's a false analogy right from the get-go.
But if you insist with the analogy, using real guns would be the equivalent to engaging in unprotected sex, and paint-balling would be practicing safe sex.
So far, the only fact used to support the idea that homosexuality and AIDS are causally linked is certainly just coincidence, and there's plenty of data to support the argument that they are not inherently linked.
You were the one who asked ME what Aids meant and you didn't know it was first seen in h-men?? Wow!
If I recall, it's still a bit unclear as to what the exact origin is, but the general consensus is that it first developed in chimpanzees, and transmitted to us when someone ate chimp brains to survive in the jungle before coming back and sleeping with lots of people (unsafely, of course.)It is thought to have come from primates though some say it is manmade.
Or it's just some Elves having fun at our expense.I do see your argument that h-men were around before Aids, but it is not a coincidence (as there is no such things). When we do not keep the law it is carried out through the Consciousness of the universe..everything is connected.
Support please.If I'm not mistaken the oldest sample of the AIDS virus was found in a woman. Just saying. Woman cause AIDS. Obviously.
Robert Evans said:It is not natural.......
Robert Evans said:.......it is not normal.......
Robert Evans said:.......it does not bring about life.......
Robert Evans said:.......it brings about death.......
Robert Evans said:.......it has helped spread a worldwide epidemic.......
If I'm not mistaken the oldest sample of the AIDS virus was found in a woman. Just saying. Woman cause AIDS. Obviously.
Sounds like being a woman is immoral!
And unnatural!
We should probably cage them and try some re-education.
At the very least, womanhood should be illegal.
why does this site not have a quote recognition so you know when someone has commented on something. It is ridiculous to look through many pages to perhaps find a quote.Message to Robert Evans: What do you recommend that homosexuals do about their homosexuality?
In a physical body yes, though not always; but from the super-consciousness that we come from, no; you are what you are and you answer for what you are.Do you agree with most experts that sexual identity is not a choice?
irrelevant; murder is committed by humans and we do not say that is acceptable, but who knows, perhaps one day our morals will be so bad we might.Yes it is [natural] since it is found in nature. Over 1500 species of animals and birds practice homosexuality. All bonobo monkeys are bisexual, and they are a close relative of humans.
see the above.......it is not normal.......
Yes it is since it is normal for a small percentage of over 1500 species of animals and birds to practice homosexuality.
don't understand thatWhat is normal is not always desirable. For example, a normal IQ is 100, but most people would prefer to have a higher IQ than that.
nonsense; copoutQuote:
Originally Posted by Robert Evans
.......it does not bring about life.......
It can bring life if lesbians want to use in vitro fertilization. In addition, if homosexuals want to raise children, they can adopt them.
as a general comment, it brings death as Aids was seen, on-mass, in h-men and now is an epidemic involving innocents.Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Evans
.......it brings about death.......
Does that mean that you approve of homosexuals who do not have any STDs?
soIn the year 2010, about 40 times more, or about 4,000% more Americans died from heart disease alone than died from AIDS. Heart disease is often preventable. Some experts predict that by the year 2030, which is 16 years from now, about 50% of Americans will be obese, and that that will add about 500 billion dollars to health costs. Obesity is often preventable.
that would depend on what sources you read; it is not now in vogue to say things against H so it is not always likely that we shall see such figures. Either way it was firstly seen in them, through practices which are plainly not right; even a child could see that; but boy can we philosophise things if we wish.Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Evans
.......it has helped spread a worldwide epidemic.......
It has, but that is a composition fallacy, which is to judge the whole based upon parts of the whole. The vast majority of homosexuals in the U.S. do not have HIV.
everything is an evolving consciousness- we will see the good and evil as p*ndora's box is now open.Even if all humans acted like you want them to act, sickness, and death would still be widespread, and so would natural disasters, and global warming would still be the most important physical challenge that humans have ever had by far since some experts have said that it might one day cause an ice age, and that before that, rising sea levels will cause physical, and economic catastrophes in many parts of the world.
In other words, if a God exists, he has not given humans the means to live without disease, global warming, and many other problems, and in fact, God created many of the problems that humans have, such as viruses, and hurricanes.
the basic idea of evolution I have no problem with as everything is evolving-consciousness; but to say that it comes about through blind chance is madness, and the copout that something called "natural-selection" will somehow pop up and save the day, all by blind chance again, is equally ridiculous. Consciousness evolves, which is why the universe evolved from seemingly nothing.Do you accept common descent?