AmbiguousGuy
Well-Known Member
It seems you do.
Only a bit of minor time for shaming such posters.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It seems you do.
I'm not ashamed that you can't stay on topic or focus. I, on the other hand, can unabashedly spot a bunny trail to my topic when I see one.Only a bit of minor time for shaming such posters.
I'm not ashamed that you can't stay on topic or focus. I, on the other hand, can unabashedly spot a bunny trail to my topic when I see one.
Using flawed logic is not useful. My not addressing your question has nothing to do with anything other than me not taking your bait. I'll choose the bunny trails I'll follow.Here's my question again: Why do you believe that your God actually spoke in human words which we still have in our possession?
If you won't attempt an answer to that question, then your assertion that God opposes homosexuality is just empty personal opinion.
Actually, Jesus loved homosexuals, so that means that God loves homosexuality.
So you're just wrong. Sorry.
Yet the commandment has not been revoked.
Do you really need an explanation of the biology involved? Ask your parents.
Here's my question again: Why do you believe that your God actually spoke in human words which we still have in our possession?
If you won't attempt an answer to that question, then your assertion that God opposes homosexuality is just empty personal opinion.
Actually, Jesus loved homosexuals, so that means that God loves homosexuality.
So you're just wrong. Sorry.
Do you know otherwise?How do you know?
Ok.*edit*
Monogamy is also a Biblical precept.I know how sex works, thank you very much.
Considering that most people aren't interested in homosexual relationships, I still fail to see how forbidding homosexuality prevents the world from being replenished.
Especially since homosexuals are not biologically incapable of having heterosexual sex once or twice for the sake of producing offspring. But after that, they can just spend all their time with their same-sex partner. Nowadays, that's not even an issue, since gay men can be sperm donors, and lesbians can accept such donations.
Probably not for long.:run:LOL Sandy's back.
Which god are you speaking of?*edit*
Do you know otherwise?
Monogamy is also a Biblical precept.
Wow, why even go there.
God, it seems, instituted male and female in order to populate the species. In spite of what another pointed out about still having children it did not come from homosexual relations. Now, that man wishes to do as they please outside of God's commandments is fairly obvious. There are allowances for that.
He did not say you could not do it. He said you should not do so. I can kill but I shouldn't. If you are saying you see nothing wrong with it. That it produces no negative effects then why does the blood bank ask you if you are a homosexual as one of their prohibitive requirements? Are you suggesting that your desire to do something makes that thing right? I do not understand the contention here.I don't mean like doing orgies and wicked stuff like that. But why can't we make love to people of our gender. I don't get it. I am attracted to men.
That it produces no negative effects then why does the blood bank ask you if you are a homosexual as one of their prohibitive requirements?
Are you suggesting that your desire to do something makes that thing right? I do not understand the contention here.
Did you expect something more profound?Are you suggesting that a thing is wrong just because some ancient book claims it is wrong?