Nimos
Well-Known Member
So natural disasters, starvation, animals hunting and killing each other etc, you consider that an expression of God's love as well? Meaning this was the only way he could have made nature?Nature points to a loving God, as I see it.
No, that is dodging my question, remember God gave us the ability to see the difference between good and evil, otherwise Adam and Eve really got screwed.I'm not the judge, God is. God shared anything in nature, I think. The information is there. The Norse might have believed in different gods, too. But God looks into their hearts, lets see how he judges them (that's when Jesus returns, as I see it).
My question was not aimed at God, but at what you think?
And to give you an example and to let you be the judge:
I don't know you as a person, so my assumption is that you are a good and decent person.
Let's say I have some vital information and I have two options. I can either share them with you, which would save your life or I could not share them which you, which would kill you.
Do you consider me choosing not to tell you these information, an act of good or an act of evil?
Yes, but you explained earlier, in case of this event happening, which, let's be honest is extremely likely to occur. They (The murderer, victims, next of kin) would have to come to an agreement in heaven.no, if you repent ...your sins against God are forgiven. But that does not necessarily mean that all your victims forgive you, too. This is how I see it.
I also pointed out, that there is no suffering in heaven, if we are to believe Revelation. Furthermore I raised the issue, that in certain cases, the victim is not in a position to even come to an agreement with the murderer as they are in hell. Another issue, is that the next of kin to the victims might not agree how to solve it.
There is a lot of conflicts here, which you don't seem to even acknowledge, but rather that these will be solved in some magical way. As I told you, in regards to there being no suffering, there is basically two options as I see them, 1) People will be emotionally dead. 2)There will be a brain wipe, so people can't remember anything. In which case our current life is completely meaningless.
Neither of these options seems good to me, and a cowardly way of dealing with the issue of justice and good and evil.
What im interested in, is whether you see any other solution to these conflicts? Where everyone, including the murderer and the next of kins, assuming that the victims are burning in hell. Walk away satisfied with a solution, so there are no hard feeling and suffering?
But you agree that he doesn't punish murderers right? It's potentially the victim that is ending up in hell, the murderer might, if they don't repent, but at least they have a long time to figure out if they want to or not.no that's not true. He does not want that the humans he created resort to murder. It's his creation. He's the owner.
No, but it can buy them time, again it's a matter of whether you repent and accept Jesus as your savior, before your life end....that don't count for salvation....
So time is what really matters here, so you can reach the state where you accept Jesus. The murderer, just as the victim can both end up in hell as we have already established. What seperate them, is that murderer might have a better chance of coming to terms with their sins and repent. Whereas the victim was robbed of that.
Because, even if you repent today, you might risk making a sin the next day. Again it's extremely easy to sin, the moment you even think that maybe Jesus is not the savior, you are in problem. The moment you even think of another man's women with desire, you have sinned. Again if you by accident pick up some trash that is not yours, you are basically a thief, etc.why not convert on the spot instead. If his faith is strong enough to hire personnal to protect him just for the sake of having more time to convert... why not convert right where is at that very point of time? It's three minutes.
Or does it work so you can repent one time and afterwards just go nuts?
But a person that is starving, might not have the means to return anything, so they should burn in hell? or just repent afterwards?no. I say if you steal and don't return as you can, you have the wrong attitude, I think. No cherry picking here.
Last edited: